You guys looking for reasons to say everyone is a cheater should be more worried about the alliances that create 2 alliances and rotate between them to keep getting easy wars. (One alliance winning and the other dropping then swapping once the winning alliance rating gets past a certain point).
Although the alliances doing this are not top 20 so you can't go on a witch hunt and try and bring the top down so no one gives a **** about that.
@Reptilekeeper How salty are you? Did you get owned by a top alliance? Lost out on 400 shards Buhu. Everyone feels so bad for you. Cry me a river. If it were so "against" the rules, you would think kascam would say something about it. Account sharing wont be fixed. You gotta come to a realization here.
You guys looking for reasons to say everyone is a cheater should be more worried about the alliances that create 2 alliances and rotate between them to keep getting easy wars. (One alliance winning and the other dropping then swapping once the winning alliance rating gets past a certain point).
Although the alliances doing this are not top 20 so you can't go on a witch hunt and try and bring the top down so no one gives a **** about that.
The reason this has all come about is the leaked screen showing what they do to fix matching in there favour.
The point is more that their is never an answer from kabam, this would have been stopped yesterday if they had made a comment to show where they stand.
This DIRECTLY effects all the alliances that are in tier 1 and get an unfair amount of matches against the top alliances.
Yes you can start a war matching whenever you like but to organise this so it's done to a system to avoid a match against the top teams is breaking the rules, plain and simple.
I'm glad I'm not in tier 1 as if I had a few matches in a row against the said group I would be mad now knowing it's staged.
You guys looking for reasons to say everyone is a cheater should be more worried about the alliances that create 2 alliances and rotate between them to keep getting easy wars. (One alliance winning and the other dropping then swapping once the winning alliance rating gets past a certain point).
Although the alliances doing this are not top 20 so you can't go on a witch hunt and try and bring the top down so no one gives a **** about that.
The reason this has all come about is the leaked screen showing what they do to fix matching in there favour.
The point is more that their is never an answer from kabam, this would have been stopped yesterday if they had made a comment to show where they stand.
This DIRECTLY effects all the alliances that are in tier 1 and get an unfair amount of matches against the top alliances.
Yes you can start a war matching whenever you like but to organise this so it's done to a system to avoid a match against the top teams is breaking the rules, plain and simple.
I'm glad I'm not in tier 1 as if I had a few matches in a row against the said group I would be mad now knowing it's staged.
What tier are you in? You are making such a big stink and this doesn't even directly affect you . Smh
@Reptilekeeper I'm not sure why you think they are breaking the rules when aw is functioning as intended and these guys don't cheat during wars. Is the matchmaking system flawed? Of course it is. But starting a time to war whenever you want is not cheating.
Nothing in TOS mentions this kind of issue nor does the forum rules. I can't accept your opinions when you thought rules applying to fair play of website services applied to war matchmaking.
Exploring glitches for your own good is against TOS but matchmaking working as intended is not a glitch just a flawed system that should be fixed to prevent alliances from coordinating times to start matchmaking
It's already been shown several times that the rules are being broken and that's a fact..
No defence I'm sorry you've been caught and outed by one of your own by realising the screenshot and the comments on the full screen shot say it all
You act like they have been "Busted". There is nothing wrong with what they are doing. They are well within their rights to strategically call war whenever they want to.
Also, if those alliances won every war by doing that they are doing then hey would have a much higher war rating than they do. Also, how valid is a post of a picture on the internet? That picture has no credibility
@Kabam Miike This is basically a copy of the thread that got deleted a couple of hours ago. Do us the favor by deleting it again, It serves no purpose
I disagree that it serves no purpose. Unlike the other thread the original post does not accuse anyone or any alliance of cheating. If people would look back at the post it simply says "should the system be changed?"
I think the system does need to be changed. A simple solution that would address this is change the rewards. The participation rewards currently are garbage compared to the rewards you get for winning. The reason the top alliances do not like facing each other is the same reason lesser alliances hate getting death matches...you get **** rewards for participating and losing. If they increase the participation rewards and decrease the victory rewards it would seem to solve the issue. Furthermore if they then beefed up the items in the war victor crystal it would still give alliances more incentive to win and use potions if necessary.
There's no cheating here plain and simple.
Not sure why anyone is upset about this tbh. I'm much more concerned with alliances doing shell swapping.
The truth is nobody near the bottom of tier 1 should be getting anywhere near the same rewards as MMX, 8A or Core if the system went the way you want it to. If MMX has to fight ISO every war they should be getting way more rewards if they LOSE than most of tier 1 if they win. That'd solve your 'issue'.
@Spartacus29 I agree it is not cheating (just as 2* wars was not cheating either). But I think your statement shows why the participation rewards need to be scaled up and war victor rewards scaled down. The reason the top alliances avoid each other is because like all other alliances they want more rewards. And why waste potions going up against another top alliance (completing all maps and killing all bosses) only to miss out on victory rewards because of trivial points? Like I said it is a problem with the system, not cheating.
Comments
Although the alliances doing this are not top 20 so you can't go on a witch hunt and try and bring the top down so no one gives a **** about that.
The reason this has all come about is the leaked screen showing what they do to fix matching in there favour.
The point is more that their is never an answer from kabam, this would have been stopped yesterday if they had made a comment to show where they stand.
This DIRECTLY effects all the alliances that are in tier 1 and get an unfair amount of matches against the top alliances.
Yes you can start a war matching whenever you like but to organise this so it's done to a system to avoid a match against the top teams is breaking the rules, plain and simple.
I'm glad I'm not in tier 1 as if I had a few matches in a row against the said group I would be mad now knowing it's staged.
What tier are you in? You are making such a big stink and this doesn't even directly affect you . Smh
Nothing in TOS mentions this kind of issue nor does the forum rules. I can't accept your opinions when you thought rules applying to fair play of website services applied to war matchmaking.
You act like they have been "Busted". There is nothing wrong with what they are doing. They are well within their rights to strategically call war whenever they want to.
I disagree that it serves no purpose. Unlike the other thread the original post does not accuse anyone or any alliance of cheating. If people would look back at the post it simply says "should the system be changed?"
I think the system does need to be changed. A simple solution that would address this is change the rewards. The participation rewards currently are garbage compared to the rewards you get for winning. The reason the top alliances do not like facing each other is the same reason lesser alliances hate getting death matches...you get **** rewards for participating and losing. If they increase the participation rewards and decrease the victory rewards it would seem to solve the issue. Furthermore if they then beefed up the items in the war victor crystal it would still give alliances more incentive to win and use potions if necessary.
Not sure why anyone is upset about this tbh. I'm much more concerned with alliances doing shell swapping.
The truth is nobody near the bottom of tier 1 should be getting anywhere near the same rewards as MMX, 8A or Core if the system went the way you want it to. If MMX has to fight ISO every war they should be getting way more rewards if they LOSE than most of tier 1 if they win. That'd solve your 'issue'.