@DNA3000 there is a new quantum branch of markov chains that does sort of look at this thing (don't ask me how it works lol) but yeh technically google isn't a markov chain its more to do with modelling the world wide web and page rank computation but people get lost when we delve into stuff this complicated without giving a simplified overview. So in short you are correct! I'd be happy for you add me on line - my name is Milan Patel so we can continue this discussion. It's very interesting and you are obviously a learned individual
Yeah @Milan1405@DNA3000 my friend is working in quantum markov chain realm and he started telling me about how you could model this problem using a very new and not very understood area of maths/physics at the moment - then I got lost lol.
Don't feel bad. Quantum Markov is at the absolute limit of my ability to pretend to understand. Its a devil in the details thing: you'd think that since quantum mechanics is all about probability that something like normal statistics is the perfect tool to analyze it. But then you get into quantum operators and such, and it gets very mathy very quickly. If I understand correctly, a key issue involves the standard formulation of quantum mechanics and the Born rule. This makes trying to apply normal statistical math blindly to quantum mechanics generate wrong results, because the waveform is not a measure of probability, the square of the waveform does.
Comments
Beyond here there be dragons.