Why is war node double linked?

OmegaManOmegaMan Member Posts: 383 ★★★
Why is this node double linked? So you always have to fight a linked node either way you go? Seems like a great plan.


Comments

  • hurricanthurricant Member Posts: 608 ★★★★
    you need to go in to both at the same time and fight and that unlinks them both. time it right.

    but for real, it forces you to make a decision on which to fight first. like dungeons. one will always be linked
  • OmegaManOmegaMan Member Posts: 383 ★★★
    Lmao very well thought out.
  • edited June 2019
    This content has been removed.
  • OmegaManOmegaMan Member Posts: 383 ★★★
    Drooped2 said:

    It forces smart play. Like gamora is easy all.the time have that guy go first

    It’s just a really dumb design.
  • This content has been removed.
  • SiriusBreakSiriusBreak Member, Guardian Posts: 2,156 Guardian
    It forces tactical decisions. Or will occasionally punish haphazard play. It seems 'dumb' on the outside, but as there's typically a better choice between the 2. You communicate with your section mate that they or you should go 1st and drop the link. Or you don't and maybe lose an attack bonus for being a cowboy out there.

    As it stands, as a whole, AW seems to be promoting more tactical play across the board. They allow us to see the majority of the defenders to help choose the best 3 for the job. They allow us to meet in the middle, and allow anyone to go anywhere they want in section 2. Yes, the difficulty went up in some respects. At the same time, situations can be managed if proper preparation is employed.
  • OmegaManOmegaMan Member Posts: 383 ★★★
    I would disagree but we all have our own opinions.
  • SiriusBreakSiriusBreak Member, Guardian Posts: 2,156 Guardian
    OmegaMan said:

    I would disagree but we all have our own opinions.

    Fair enough. I guess this was mildly inspired by the Dungeon format. It does open up choice vs just having it part of the node regardless. Ultimately, someone has to fight a linked node though.
  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    OmegaMan said:

    I would disagree but we all have our own opinions.

    you dont like it, that does not mean they are wrong, it does force tactical decisions. Who do you take down, which is easier while the link it is up. That is tactical. Dont confuse not liking something with it being wrong.
  • edited June 2019
    This content has been removed.
  • OmegaManOmegaMan Member Posts: 383 ★★★
    Lormif said:

    OmegaMan said:

    I would disagree but we all have our own opinions.

    you dont like it, that does not mean they are wrong, it does force tactical decisions. Who do you take down, which is easier while the link it is up. That is tactical. Dont confuse not liking something with it being wrong.
    Didn’t say they were wrong I said it’s dumb and that my opinion.
Sign In or Register to comment.