Awakening Gems

Jridenhour_3Jridenhour_3 Member Posts: 349 ★★
in Suggestions and Requests
Can we have awakening gems crystals like we do t4cc crystals. Say u can trade 2 of the same class awakening gems for a chance at one of a different classes gem as we do for t4cc.

Comments

  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,524 ★★★★★
    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.
  • Jridenhour_3Jridenhour_3 Member Posts: 349 ★★
    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,524 ★★★★★
    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,524 ★★★★★
    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    It wouldnt hurt anyone.not sure why anyone would be against it.
    Its still a.1 in 5 chance to get what you want. Plus you lose 2 of a fairly rare resource and could.be left with just 1 of something else you don't need.

    Only seeing it being "worth it" for 4* or below.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,524 ★★★★★
    edited June 2019
    Kabam is just preparing you for silver surfer.
    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
    Imagine you've pulled 6 cosmic gems how does that help?

    Just saying theres no downside to this that I can see dont wanna do the trade then dont just like the t4cc
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Jridenhour_3Jridenhour_3 Member Posts: 349 ★★
    Demonzfyre said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    It wouldnt hurt anyone.not sure why anyone would be against it.
    Its still a.1 in 5 chance to get what you want. Plus you lose 2 of a fairly rare resource and could.be left with just 1 of something else you don't need.

    Only seeing it being "worth it" for 4* or below.
    Yeah its possible you dnt get what you want but like someone previously said. If you've got 6 cosmic. It can only help
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,524 ★★★★★
    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    It wouldnt hurt anyone.not sure why anyone would be against it.
    Its still a.1 in 5 chance to get what you want. Plus you lose 2 of a fairly rare resource and could.be left with just 1 of something else you don't need.

    Only seeing it being "worth it" for 4* or below.
    And let people gamble with rare stuff theres no harm
    SquishyjrThe_4TH said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
    Imagine you've pulled 6 cosmic gems how does that help?

    Just saying theres no downside to this that I can see dont wanna do the trade then dont just like the t4cc
    Imagine basing off claims on what-about and what-if-ism
    I've pulled 6 cosmic gems
    Hela
    Corvus
    Chanpion
    Venom the duck
    Have 3 left.

    Sorry once laid out I've pulled 7 cosmic gems your correct that's alot better
    Let's push for a trade for AGs instead. I need a cosmic for my VtD. I'll give you one my 2 techs
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,524 ★★★★★
    I needs me a science and mutant too. I'd use one for void and Namor if i ever get him. Or Havok.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 20,042 Guardian
    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
    Imagine you've pulled 6 cosmic gems how does that help?

    Just saying theres no downside to this that I can see dont wanna do the trade then dont just like the t4cc
    You could say the same thing about selling 5* champs, except there was a significant downside and thus we can't do that anymore. The significant downside being that lots of people did it, then claimed it was an accident or that their dog did it, and then support staff that can barely count to ten on their fingers were put in the position of arbitrating all these claims, and meanwhile players were complaining about how Kabam was mishandling all of these incidents.

    Personally, I'm generally in favor of letting people make their own decisions, as long as they promise to do it quietly and accept full responsibility for them. When Thanos snaps that world into existence, I'll support unlimited player gameplay discretion. On this Earth, that has to have practical limits.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,524 ★★★★★
    Drooped2 said:

    DNA3000 said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
    Imagine you've pulled 6 cosmic gems how does that help?

    Just saying theres no downside to this that I can see dont wanna do the trade then dont just like the t4cc
    You could say the same thing about selling 5* champs, except there was a significant downside and thus we can't do that anymore. The significant downside being that lots of people did it, then claimed it was an accident or that their dog did it, and then support staff that can barely count to ten on their fingers were put in the position of arbitrating all these claims, and meanwhile players were complaining about how Kabam was mishandling all of these incidents.

    Personally, I'm generally in favor of letting people make their own decisions, as long as they promise to do it quietly and accept full responsibility for them. When Thanos snaps that world into existence, I'll support unlimited player gameplay discretion. On this Earth, that has to have practical limits.
    Support shouldnt be in the practice of fixing customer mistakes or bad choices.

    Choices have consequences no running to mommy to get a do over. Imo.

    Sold all your 5s? Well your problem sucks to be you ticket closed
    I remember those days on the other forums.
  • DjinDjin Member Posts: 1,962 ★★★★★
    I'm not going to trade 2 AGs for 1 AG. They are already rare resources.
    T4 Catalyst trade is only recommend to be used if your catalyst are about to expire and you can't use them.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Jridenhour_3Jridenhour_3 Member Posts: 349 ★★
    DjinAF said:

    I'm not going to trade 2 AGs for 1 AG. They are already rare resources.
    T4 Catalyst trade is only recommend to be used if your catalyst are about to expire and you can't use them.

    They are rare. But let the players decide whether they want to take a chance at risking some.of the rarest items for a chance to possibly awakening a champ that could clear material they couldnt before.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,714 ★★★★★
    DNA3000 said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
    Imagine you've pulled 6 cosmic gems how does that help?

    Just saying theres no downside to this that I can see dont wanna do the trade then dont just like the t4cc
    You could say the same thing about selling 5* champs, except there was a significant downside and thus we can't do that anymore. The significant downside being that lots of people did it, then claimed it was an accident or that their dog did it, and then support staff that can barely count to ten on their fingers were put in the position of arbitrating all these claims, and meanwhile players were complaining about how Kabam was mishandling all of these incidents.

    Personally, I'm generally in favor of letting people make their own decisions, as long as they promise to do it quietly and accept full responsibility for them. When Thanos snaps that world into existence, I'll support unlimited player gameplay discretion. On this Earth, that has to have practical limits.
    Agreed. There's also the fact that selling 5*s was disabled around the same time that 6*s were announced. That may have been a contributing factor. For one thing, it would have released them faster than they intended. For another, I have no doubt we'd see a number of Accounts with a 6* and not much else, due to the hype.
  • LormifLormif Member Posts: 7,369 ★★★★★
    SquishyjrThe_4TH said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
    Imagine you've pulled 6 cosmic gems how does that help?

    Just saying theres no downside to this that I can see dont wanna do the trade then dont just like the t4cc
    Imagine basing off claims on what-about and what-if-ism
    This has all been what ifs and whatabout ism, you dont get to claim it for one side.

    Fact is it does not hurt anyone because it is a choice.
  • bloodyCainbloodyCain Member Posts: 910 ★★★
    Can we get a free 4* generic AG this year? Nothing much. Just one. Please?
    It won't hurt the game at this point right?
    Am I embarrassing myself right now? Don't care your judgement anyway ;)
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Jridenhour_3Jridenhour_3 Member Posts: 349 ★★
    @Kabam Miike Any response to this. You guys moved it off general discussion so it's been seen. But none of administrators said anything.
  • hooveralbertohooveralberto Member Posts: 15 ★
    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    It wouldnt hurt anyone.not sure why anyone would be against it.
    Its still a.1 in 5 chance to get what you want. Plus you lose 2 of a fairly rare resource and could.be left with just 1 of something else you don't need.

    Only seeing it being "worth it" for 4* or below.
    And let people gamble with rare stuff theres no harm
    SquishyjrThe_4TH said:

    Drooped2 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    Jridenhour_3 said:

    Demonzfyre said:

    God no. That would be a horrible idea. Plus its been offered a few times. Its widely disliked by a vast majority.

    Why would it be a horrible idea. Would help the people who get shafted by RNG
    Would it though? Imagine you trade in 2 skill gems. You need a cosmic gem. Then you get a tech gem..... How does it help?
    Imagine you've pulled 6 cosmic gems how does that help?

    Just saying theres no downside to this that I can see dont wanna do the trade then dont just like the t4cc
    Imagine basing off claims on what-about and what-if-ism
    I've pulled 6 cosmic gems
    Hela
    Corvus
    Chanpion
    Venom the duck
    Have 3 left.

    Sorry once laid out I've pulled 7 cosmic gems your correct that's alot better
    Let's push for a trade for AGs instead. I need a cosmic for my VtD. I'll give you one my 2 techs
    I'd make a trade for just about any class
    Darkhawk
    Iceman
    Sym supreme
    Void,thing
    Aegon,killmonger

    Got 3 cosmics I'd part with all 2 for trades:)

    Gonna awaken new captain marvel
    seria bueno poder intercambiar las gemas o los catalizadores con los integrantes de la alianza, asi cambiar lo que no necesitas con un compañero que si lo necesita
Sign In or Register to comment.