What is better for 5.3 100% ?

KerneasKerneas Member Posts: 3,882 ★★★★★
I have been struggling a tiny bit with this piece of content and while I know it's fair, I couldn't push myself to do it. Before I start, what is better to use: (please note that I have a fairly wide roster with 3-5 4*r5 and higher from each class)

What is better for 5.3 100% ? 21 votes

Normal champs (stronger in terms of ranks
66%
ShrimkinsHaji_SaabRazorDevilzuffyTerraAKTEK10or_StrongLoctiteSuperGlueEtjamaspigwenderSuperGoodH3t3ryousef_8000Giodood_1 14 votes
Class specific champs (weaker in terms of ranks
33%
MikeyBoi69Lvernon15DOKTOROKTOPUSHector_1475X_Factor_AgentMassapealE_N_D__G_A_M_E 7 votes

Comments

  • ShrimkinsShrimkins Member Posts: 1,479 ★★★★
    Normal champs (stronger in terms of ranks
    In the long run, it's better to simply rank up good champs. It is good to take an inventory of your roster every now and then though to see if there are any holes. I would rank up to fill a utility need in my roster before I rank for a specific piece of content.
  • This content has been removed.
  • zuffyzuffy Member Posts: 2,263 ★★★★★
    Normal champs (stronger in terms of ranks
    Hyperion is a great asset for 5.3. Pretty much any high damage champs will do fine.
  • Hector_1475Hector_1475 Member Posts: 1,794 ★★★★★
    Class specific champs (weaker in terms of ranks
    I opted to do it with the Class-specific champs in my roster, plus 1 or 2 champs from another class for synergies and / or the right counters for certain fights.


    5.3 is all about roster depth and roster variety (as far as abilities go). Plus, if you decide to embrace and accept this, it will be ultimately fun to use different champions in your roster and clear content with them.
  • AKTEKAKTEK Member Posts: 317 ★★
    Normal champs (stronger in terms of ranks
    I will say combination of both.Normal champs with good damage output and 1-2 class specific champs.
  • This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.