Corvus and aggressive armor node
ThatGuy214
Member Posts: 310 ★★
Any update when this inter action will be fixed. When Corvus parried an opponent he would turn the armor up from this node to armor breaks making him a suitable counter he no longer is having this interaction with this node. In which his ability reads all armor breaks are converted.
2
Comments
"Well Timed Blocks
Inflicts an Armor Break, reducing the opponents Armor Rating by 352 for 4 seconds. Additional Armor Breaks are inflicted for each active Armor Up effect on the opponent."
As you can read, he places an armor break for every armor up effect on the opponent. Armor break debuffs usually remove armor up BUFFS, but they never did it with passive armor's unless stated somewhere (IW IM or Killmonger, for example).
So in this case it's working as intended. He places armor breaks, but don't remove the passive armor stacks. Same goes for optimist and pessimist nodes as well
He places an armor break for every armor up effect on the opponent.
What exactly is the issue here, since you did not described it at all? Is he not doing that?
Again, placing an armor break debuff is one ability, and remove armor up effects is another one. Corvus doesn't remove any by it's base abilities
Additionally you’re reading something that isn’t there for CG’s armor break. He applies an armor break for each armor effect, it says nothing about removing effects for each armor break.
There was a thread about the second, he’s wrong.
* In his video he claims the maze imiw functioned differently, this video and the fact no none posted CG as a cheese counter proves he’s wrong.
What’s happening with RR’s armor is that the armor has more value than the armor breaks applied and you need to bring armor into the negatives for CG to see an increase in damage.
You just posted these videos proving what I waa saying earlier
This is CM movie info look how it reads
Here is a video of her removing those passive stacks
Imiw's passives for instance WILL break, not because they are buffs, but because his ability litterally says so.
A stack of Armor is lost each time Iron Man is inflicted by an Armor Break effect.
This is more than likely what you saw previously.
What wont be affected by Corvus is the NODES passives (other than the breaks themselves), which does not follow IMIWs molecular amror rules.
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/comment/415986
https://forums.playcontestofchampions.com/en/discussion/72138/iron-man-infinity-war-tier-3-and-above-aw
He’s always worked this way. Repeatedly saying otherwise with zero evidence is ridiculous.
Her ability specifically states she removes them, no matter if they are a buff or a passive:
Striking with a Heavy Attack while the opponent is charging or executing a Heavy Attack removes all Armor Up effects and inflicts Stun for 2.5 seconds.
Corvus' ability does not, it says they get an armor break for each one.
inflicts an Armor Break, reducing the opponents Armor Rating by 352 for 4 seconds. Additional Armor Breaks are inflicted for each active Armor Up effect on the opponent.
So Captain marvels ability explicitly breaks the rules of the game, corvus' does not, and instead relies on IMIW's own ability to let him break the rules for IMIWs buffs only..
The first is true, that is what his ability states, but no where in his ability does it say that he can remove the armors even if they are passive.
Since you are talking about him being counter for this node it is assumed you mean remove the armor ups, not just place a break. You need to show where on Corvus' ability sheet it says he removes all effects, like it says on Marvels.
Again, its all explained in the abilities. You are stating whats there and creating something that isn't.
Again, passive armor arent removed with armor break debuffs
You are inserting words into his ability that is not there.