There was no issues in 7th wars. Why don't you count 7th war??
Your just suggesting what benefits your alliance. Which is lucky even to be in Top5 with your usual death count
I typically dont die much, and since I dont know you I am not sure how you would know my death count, in addition my alliance is actually harmed by this, we moved up to p3 on the 7th war. It does not benefit my alliance.
If they lost the first two then they lost the first two. It sucks but it happens. The issues begun around the 7th war so bay doing the last 6 it keeps the competitive and fair nature of war. If they would allow 7th and 8th then the people who were not able to enlist would be screwed even more.
If they lost the first two then they lost the first two. It sucks but it happens. The issues begun around the 7th war so bay doing the last 6 it keeps the competitive and fair nature of war. If they would allow 7th and 8th then the people who were not able to enlist would be screwed even more.
7th did not have an enlistment issue, that was 8 and 9, 7 was cut off short.
If they lost the first two then they lost the first two. It sucks but it happens. The issues begun around the 7th war so bay doing the last 6 it keeps the competitive and fair nature of war. If they would allow 7th and 8th then the people who were not able to enlist would be screwed even more.
Well that's sad for us then.. but I hope season 14 is perfect for all of us.. We were in Silver 1 last season, but we worked very hard to get in Gold 2... I hope we are gold 2 by the end of calculation period
Ok just to say something you shouldn’t have any participation included. People traded alliances within rules and your bugs caused the problem. Give everyone in the alliance the rewards. Don’t be stingy.
I’m not saying this for me as I have been in my alliance for 6 months but for those who made moves within season rules I see now getting screwed that are either in my alliance or sister alliance or friends of mine I’ve kept over time in game.
Just open the gates and give everyone in the alliance now at this time the rewards. Don’t penalize people for your(not meaning you but your game) mistakes. I don’t think this would be a big deal and would help the issue of leaving people out who moved within season rules.
I wholeheartedly agree with this. There are two players in my alliance who moved just prior to the AW outage, players who were planning on participating in the last 5 wars of the season.
Due to the recurring de-enlistment bug, they were not able to participate in a SINGLE war after joining us. Not their fault in the slightest, entirely due to Kabam’s error, and now they are excluded from even the compensation package.
I fail to see how this fair for others in a similar predicament.
Exactly we where in recruiting stage replacing people for first 2, 1 was a draw and out of first 6 we lost 3 draw 1 and won 2 we where top 40 gold2 and we was coming back strong and finiahed this war now gold1, but none of our boosts or resources count now what a waste and lose 6*-5* shards and t5bc and t2alphas
If they lost the first two then they lost the first two. It sucks but it happens. The issues begun around the 7th war so bay doing the last 6 it keeps the competitive and fair nature of war. If they would allow 7th and 8th then the people who were not able to enlist would be screwed even more.
7th did not have an enlistment issue, that was 8 and 9, 7 was cut off short.
Right, that's why I said issues begun. But thanks for elaborating on it man
No solution would please everyone.... everyone makes mistakes and have failures in a product that creates huge issues.... given what has happen and that it was far from ideal.... I think ending the war and going on the first 6 wars was the correct decision. It immediately stop things getting any worse than it is and give time to resolve the bugs and think about compensation. 2 days for everyone to settle down and catch our breath is also a good thing. I say it is a good call @Kabam Miike
If they lost the first two then they lost the first two. It sucks but it happens. The issues begun around the 7th war so bay doing the last 6 it keeps the competitive and fair nature of war. If they would allow 7th and 8th then the people who were not able to enlist would be screwed even more.
7th did not have an enlistment issue, that was 8 and 9, 7 was cut off short.
Then they should have calculated 7th war too. I would have given us better standout chances
So, Since we were on the Platinum 1/Master border after 6 wars and won our last 3 wars. We will get Platinum 1 rewards and not Master rewards? and our last 2 wins were in Tier 1? The 3 allies we faced all cleared 100% of their maps so it is not like we won these wars with ease. (The last 2 were within 200 points).
I get that there are some allies (maybe most) that are going to benefit from Season 13 being cancelled, however, there are a few like ours that will hinder our accomplishments and rewards.
There's a potential frickton of players that: - don't visit the forum - don't use third party communication for the game - don't have the global chat enabled - don't follow mcoc on any social media site.
And out of those people, how many do you think tried to still qualify for season rewards on friday, wasn't able to due to the maintenance, and therefore had all the reasons in the world to just give up.
While all they had to do was try their best to participate in one war.
How hard can it be to announce something in game. This war season has been compromised since friday. Cancelling it was a foreseeable nessecary measure since friday. Lowering the cutoff for season rewards would have been an expectable consequence.
This is outrageous imo.
Much harder than you'd think. We have an in game message coming, but when we have to act right away, we can't wait for messaging to be written, vetted, translated, tested (yes, we have to test messages), and then sent. This decisions was made today, and will be in a message that we get emergency translations for later.
Additionally, the forums are a news source that we use, and while we understand that not everybody uses them, it is a place that we disseminate official announcements that we need to get out in a hurry.
If you are despising 6 wars, the fairest solution is to apply 6 wins to all alliances, and the score is based on the tier you were in 6th aw. @Kabam Miike
My team is not happy! We were climbing to secure our plat4 rank. But if they use only 6 wars then we’re screwed. What about all the units spent on boost, glory and potions/revive???
I honestly feel this is the best approach. I think this way the least amount of people will be angry.
Perhaps they should have considered 7th war too.. as the issue started from 8th war onwards. I know Kabam is trying it's best to be fair.. but sometimes in this policy few alliances will have to suffer.
If you are despising 6 wars, the fairest solution is to apply 6 wins to all alliances, and the score is based on the tier you were in 6th aw. @Kabam Miike
That would not change the rankings, everyone would scale up almost exactly as they are now.
Eles vão fazer o que sempre fazem, nos dizer que estão investigando o caso e mais nada. Simples assim. Só visam o lucro quando tudo vai bem, agora quando tudo vai mau, eles não se preocupam com a demanda de jogadores que vão abandonar o jogo por conta do descaso deles. Vão postar uma mensagem neste tópico e encerrar o assunto. É assim que eles resolvem tudo.
If they lost the first two then they lost the first two. It sucks but it happens. The issues begun around the 7th war so bay doing the last 6 it keeps the competitive and fair nature of war. If they would allow 7th and 8th then the people who were not able to enlist would be screwed even more.
7th did not have an enlistment issue, that was 8 and 9, 7 was cut off short.
Then they should have calculated 7th war too. I would have given us better standout chances
So ignore that people lost because of the outage? my alliance loses a rank because the 7th war was the one we got our new rank, but it is not fair for most people.
@Kabam Miike This is definitely the correct decision and i support if fully. Please keep in mind most players in top alliances use 2-3 sets of champion boosts per war, as well as several 'grey' boosts that cost 10,000 Loyalty per boost. When establishing the compensation, i ask that you consider giving all players at least 6 sets of boosts, as well as 60,000 loyalty for the 3 problematic wars (2 sets per war).
@Lormif its more why wait til 2-3 wars later when people spend resources to get back to their ranks and all for nothing as its waste units glory and loyalty for boosts and pots and now omes who started season off not so great get penalised for trying to catch back up and now will lose out on major rewards
@Kabam Miike we lost 7 straight because of an inflated war rating, we won our last 3. Currently in Gold 1, and now we’re gonna he bumped back to gold 2. This sucks man.
Comments
Lastly I was just stating a fact.
PS learn how to quote.
Due to the recurring de-enlistment bug, they were not able to participate in a SINGLE war after joining us. Not their fault in the slightest, entirely due to Kabam’s error, and now they are excluded from even the compensation package.
I fail to see how this fair for others in a similar predicament.
I get that there are some allies (maybe most) that are going to benefit from Season 13 being cancelled, however, there are a few like ours that will hinder our accomplishments and rewards.
Additionally, the forums are a news source that we use, and while we understand that not everybody uses them, it is a place that we disseminate official announcements that we need to get out in a hurry.
This is definitely the correct decision and i support if fully. Please keep in mind most players in top alliances use 2-3 sets of champion boosts per war, as well as several 'grey' boosts that cost 10,000 Loyalty per boost. When establishing the compensation, i ask that you consider giving all players at least 6 sets of boosts, as well as 60,000 loyalty for the 3 problematic wars (2 sets per war).