Should alliance leadership be restructured?

killer7703killer7703 Member Posts: 19 ★
edited February 2020 in General Discussion
Around the end of the every alliance season there are complaints from summoners who may or may not have been unfairly kicked before the season rewards were awarded. I propose that before a member of an alliance is kicked there should be a vote decided by majority that includes the leader and all officers. Also there should be a way for the leader to be challenged if they are seen unfit for the role, this would be decided by all alliance members and have a one week cooldown to minimize abuse. This could be tweaked in any way but there needs to be a way to stop unfair practices in alliance leadership positions.

Should alliance leadership be restructured? 33 votes

Yes, we need to restructure.
48% 16 votes
No, the system is fine.
51% 17 votes

Comments

  • GinjabredMonstaGinjabredMonsta Member, Guardian Posts: 6,488 Guardian
    edited February 2020
    So this is gunna be the forum topic of the day I see
  • Andyball270Andyball270 Member Posts: 303 ★★★
    I literally put this idea forward in another disucssion about 30 minutes before you started this topic. Think someone may have pinched my idea :o
  • killer7703killer7703 Member Posts: 19 ★
    edited February 2020
    Andyball270 said:

    I literally put this idea forward in another disucssion about 30 minutes before you started this topic. Think someone may have pinched my idea :o

    If you are implying that I saw your post and used the idea as my own, then you are mistaken. I just read your post and I see similarities between it and my own and I understand why you would come to the conclusion that I copied you, but that is not the case. I just want to stop seeing players screwed over by immature individuals.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 20,314 Guardian
    killer7703 said:

    Around the end of the every alliance season there are complaints from summoners who may or may not have been unfairly kicked before the season rewards were awarded. I propose that before a member of an alliance is kicked there should be a vote decided by majority that includes the leader and all officers. Also there should be a way for the leader to be challenged if they are seen unfit for the role, this would be decided by all alliance members and have a one week cooldown to minimize abuse. This could be tweaked in any way but there needs to be a way to stop unfair practices in alliance leadership positions.

    In order to preserve the balance between the individual members and the battlegroups of which the alliance is composed, each battlegroup should get a set of votes decided by the officers of each group who will poll the individual members and cast their votes according to a set convention decided by the battlegroup beforehand.

    Since not all members would necessarily qualify for alliance rewards at the time of the vote, perhaps some way to fractionally reduce their representation in the vote apportionment could be established, although that has the potential to pose an irreconcilable controversy before the alliance members.
Sign In or Register to comment.