It would make sense, because it’s either you block a hit or are hit. So you’ve got to take hits yourself to remove the indestructible charges. If all you had to do was to hit the opponent, why would you also be able to remove them by blocking? If that was the case the indestructible charges would be pointless and the tactic would be virtually useless. Whether it proves to be OP or not, I don’t think it’s a typo.
I feel for stubborn to be strong but still viable they just need to remove dodge as an activator, that way dexterity would not be included and we can still make decent headway into AW.
It would make sense, because it’s either you block a hit or are hit. So you’ve got to take hits yourself to remove the indestructible charges. If all you had to do was to hit the opponent, why would you also be able to remove them by blocking? If that was the case the indestructible charges would be pointless and the tactic would be virtually useless. Whether it proves to be OP or not, I don’t think it’s a typo. By your logic why would getting hit be a penalty to the defender then?
Just don’t use Ghost or Quake. Done. No problem
@Kabam Zibiit @Kabam Vydious @Kabam Porthos @Kabam Lyra Can any of you confirm? Does dex trigger stubborn?Does hitting the defender remove indestructible charges or getting hit by the defender remove them?Do they act like killmongers indestructible buffs or act like luke cages?