Wanna is the casual pronunciation of both want to and want a. ... We pronounce want to as wanna when we talk about the first and second person (I, you, we, they) but not the third person.
It doesn’t make sense saying “I wanna civil warrior” you wanna what civil warrior? It sounds like you’re missing a word between ‘wanna’ and ‘civil warrior’.
“I want a civil warrior” would’ve been the correct sentence.
well yeah
edit: I'm sorry. it should have been "well, yeah." I apologize for any frustrations.
Wanna is the casual pronunciation of both want to and want a. ... We pronounce want to as wanna when we talk about the first and second person (I, you, we, they) but not the third person.
It doesn’t make sense saying “I wanna civil warrior” you wanna what civil warrior? It sounds like you’re missing a word between ‘wanna’ and ‘civil warrior’.
“I want a civil warrior” would’ve been the correct sentence.
well yeah
edit: I'm sorry. it should have been "well, yeah." I apologize for any frustrations.
Wanna is the casual pronunciation of both want to and want a. ... We pronounce want to as wanna when we talk about the first and second person (I, you, we, they) but not the third person.
It doesn’t make sense saying “I wanna civil warrior” you wanna what civil warrior? It sounds like you’re missing a word between ‘wanna’ and ‘civil warrior’.
“I want a civil warrior” would’ve been the correct sentence.
Wanna is the casual pronunciation of both want to and want a... We pronounce want to as wanna when we talk about the first and second person (I, you, we, they) but not the third person.
It doesn’t make sense saying “I wanna civil warrior” you wanna what civil warrior? It sounds like you’re missing a word between ‘wanna’ and ‘civil warrior’.
“I want a civil warrior” would’ve been the correct sentence.
You contradicted yourself - if wanna is a casual pronunciation of 'want a' then there aren't any words missing. I wanna Civil Warrior / I want a Civil Warrior. It makes perfect sense.
Wanna is the casual pronunciation of both want to and want a. ... We pronounce want to as wanna when we talk about the first and second person (I, you, we, they) but not the third person.
It doesn’t make sense saying “I wanna civil warrior” you wanna what civil warrior? It sounds like you’re missing a word between ‘wanna’ and ‘civil warrior’.
“I want a civil warrior” would’ve been the correct sentence.
Also, for grammar police, you're not very good with grammar. You're missing commas and you're not putting quotations around "want to", "want a", or "wanna" which makes your paragraphs really weird to read. If you're gonna (and yes, I'm saying gonna) correct someone, you better know what you're talking about. Git gud, scrub.
Wanna is the casual pronunciation of both want to and want a. ... We pronounce want to as wanna when we talk about the first and second person (I, you, we, they) but not the third person.
It doesn’t make sense saying “I wanna civil warrior” you wanna what civil warrior? It sounds like you’re missing a word between ‘wanna’ and ‘civil warrior’.
“I want a civil warrior” would’ve been the correct sentence.
Also, for grammar police, you're not very good with grammar. You're missing commas and you're not putting quotations around "want to", "want a", or "wanna" which makes your paragraphs really weird to read. If you're gonna (and yes, I'm saying gonna) correct someone, you better know what you're talking about. Git gud.
No you have to say 'going to' otherwise no-one will understand you at all.
Wanna is the casual pronunciation of both want to and want a... We pronounce want to as wanna when we talk about the first and second person (I, you, we, they) but not the third person.
It doesn’t make sense saying “I wanna civil warrior” you wanna what civil warrior? It sounds like you’re missing a word between ‘wanna’ and ‘civil warrior’.
“I want a civil warrior” would’ve been the correct sentence.
You contradicted yourself - if wanna is a casual pronunciation of 'want a' then there aren't any words missing. I wanna Civil Warrior / I want a Civil Warrior. It makes perfect sense.
Sorry to break it to you but I “wanna” civil warrior doesn’t make sense, what does he “wanna” do? W*nk him off? Probably. Wouldn’t surprise me. Gotta be the most annoying guy on here.
Also, you’re commenting on my grammar it was rushed it 3:58am I’ve been awake all day with my son, so yes I missed some grammar. However, I’m not on about grammar, what I was commenting on was the correct way of saying the sentence the half whit was trying to piece together.
Yes, exactly what I am. I wasn’t even being rude about it, I was just correcting him. You’re all taking it out of context.
But clearly everyone in this forum, make a problem out of everything.
Lucasjones98: I wasn't even being rude about it Also Lucasjones98: " what does he “wanna” do? W*nk him off? Probably. Wouldn’t surprise me. Gotta be the most annoying guy on here."
It doesn’t make sense to use the term “I wanna burger” now “I want a burger” would be correct. Again to reiterate, I have a degree in the English language and I can promise you now, I know exactly what I’m talking about. Maybe In America you use that as a common term. But here in England, it is definitely not a rest term to use.
Well, spidey is in america. It's quite common here. If it's in the dictionary, its fine.
It doesn’t make sense to use the term “I wanna burger” now “I want a burger” would be correct. Again to reiterate, I have a degree in the English language and I can promise you now, I know exactly what I’m talking about. Maybe In America you use that as a common term. But here in England, it is definitely not a rest term to use.
Well, spidey is in america. It's quite common here. If it's in the dictionary, its fine.
Well there’s the problem then, two very different languages although we share the same tongue, there are many words or phrases used differently. But before that was even considered everyone decided to jump down my throat.
yea, we(or us? I don't know lol) Americans have a tendency to assume that everyone else online is also an american unless they make it explicitly clear that they aren't. Or that's just me, I don't know
I will start this comment by stating that I am definitely a forum "lurker," but I feel compelled to jump in for a bit. And I also feel a bit guilty, since I do feel that this forum can be, as some would say, a bit "toxic," and that what I am about to say could be construed as the same.
But how does having a degree in English Literature make you an expert in the English language? As far as I know, literature and linguistics are two very distinct disciplines. Just because someone can read a language doesn't necessarily mean that one can speak said language. Not to take anything away from anyone that can read or speak a language that they are not native to (a very impressive skill, to say the least, and one that many of the members of this very forum are much more adept at than myself, or many others), but why would you take the time to critique someone's grammar/punctuation, and then when told you're doing the exact same thing that they were doing, continually call upon your own credentials as proof of your knowledge in said subject...but not at least proof read your own comments?
Just sayin'
Edit. @Lucasjones98 I apologize if that seemed personal, as I was typing it, I realized that it was turning into a comment that was representative of the one thing about this forum that I don't particularly care for, which is negativity. I totally get being tired and having stuff to deal with outside of this silly game lol.
Also, this thread was originally about an awesome pull. Congrats on duping that CW, OP!
Comments
edit: I'm sorry. it should have been "well, yeah." I apologize for any frustrations.
I wanna Civil Warrior / I want a Civil Warrior. It makes perfect sense.
short form of "want to" or "want a":
[ + infinitive without to ] Do you wanna go now?
I wanna hamburger, Mom.
Also Lucasjones98: " what does he “wanna” do? W*nk him off? Probably. Wouldn’t surprise me. Gotta be the most annoying guy on here."
But how does having a degree in English Literature make you an expert in the English language? As far as I know, literature and linguistics are two very distinct disciplines. Just because someone can read a language doesn't necessarily mean that one can speak said language. Not to take anything away from anyone that can read or speak a language that they are not native to (a very impressive skill, to say the least, and one that many of the members of this very forum are much more adept at than myself, or many others), but why would you take the time to critique someone's grammar/punctuation, and then when told you're doing the exact same thing that they were doing, continually call upon your own credentials as proof of your knowledge in said subject...but not at least proof read your own comments?
Just sayin'
Edit. @Lucasjones98 I apologize if that seemed personal, as I was typing it, I realized that it was turning into a comment that was representative of the one thing about this forum that I don't particularly care for, which is negativity. I totally get being tired and having stuff to deal with outside of this silly game lol.
Also, this thread was originally about an awesome pull. Congrats on duping that CW, OP!