AW Diversity: Do you want per BG or per Alliance?

Personally I would prefer per BG. Since you know, we do not even have 150 champs in the MCOCverse.

Comments

Diversity is right up with the worst game implementation ever. Skill is no longer a factor nor kills (ironically, though, this is supposed to be a war). Boycott Kabam with your wallets and one star rating.

DD2

Neither! Remove it altogether.

Substance always matters more.

Rotmgmoddy

If I was forced, per BG is much better.

If it was based on the entire alliance, then as long as the number of unique champions in the game is <150, it all comes down to which alliance has all the champs including the most impossible champs to get (such as Thanos and Ultron Prime).

It will no longer be a proper war on who makes the best defense, or who has the best offensive skills. It will mostly be based on which alliance has the rarest champs in the game. Soon, when my alliance goes high enough, I'd be quite sure we would be losing against those alliances, because we don't have a member who completed LoL fast enough, we don't have a member who could explore LoL, we don't have a member who got lucky with the gifting crystals or max sig crystals.

DD2

Both of these options are terrible. It's like choosing between 1 pound of poison and 2 pounds of poison. Both will kill you.

Ozzziie

Per BG is much easier to track. Per Alliance will suck and cause officers too much work.

Kpatrix

Per BG unless it is modified to cap at 90-100. It also needs a counter strategy, so there was some cat and mouse option besides putting in max diversity/highest pi and pulling the plugs to go all out.

SirTodd_83

Mr_Platypus

Per bg is difficult enough, already had one of my officers quit because babysitting each member to make sure they place specific defenders is way too stressful and is honestly sapping a lot of fun out of the game.

HolyDirkness41

How about neither

Mcord11758

Wont vote. Diversity points are flat out ****. Get rid of it all together