Show off your "Quickmatch" stats!

Kill_GreyKill_Grey Member Posts: 8,666 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
You know...that portion of the arena that nobody seems to talk about.


Anyway, here's mine:

Comments

  • Agent_X_zzzAgent_X_zzz Member Posts: 4,498 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    lol i forgot that existed
  • EtjamaEtjama Member Posts: 7,981 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
  • Agent_X_zzzAgent_X_zzz Member Posts: 4,498 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    edited October 2020
    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
  • EtjamaEtjama Member Posts: 7,981 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
  • This content has been removed.
  • EtjamaEtjama Member Posts: 7,981 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Kill_Grey said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
    Etjama said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
    Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
    All technically true other than the Γ— 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
  • Kill_GreyKill_Grey Member Posts: 8,666 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Etjama said:

    Kill_Grey said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
    Etjama said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
    Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
    All technically true other than the Γ— 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
    I put it like that so that the unit(%) can be explicit. A proper fraction multiplied by 100 would just give rise to another fraction if the context isn't clearly stated. For conventional sake, that's how a fraction-percentage calculation is formally written.
  • NojokejaymNojokejaym Member Posts: 4,126 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    I’m not even pass 150 and I’ve been playing this game for more than 5 years
  • EtjamaEtjama Member Posts: 7,981 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    Kill_Grey said:

    Etjama said:

    Kill_Grey said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
    Etjama said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
    Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
    All technically true other than the Γ— 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
    I put it like that so that the unit(%) can be explicit. A proper fraction multiplied by 100 would just give rise to another fraction if the context isn't clearly stated. For conventional sake, that's how a fraction-percentage calculation is formally written.
    Not really. Fractions and percentages are practically the same thing. Multiplying an improper fraction by 100% is the exact same as multiplying it by 100/100 which doesn't change anything. If you want the win rate to be correct and also want the final answer to be a percentage when initially using fractions, you multiply it by 10,000%.
  • This content has been removed.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 19,678 Guardian
    Etjama said:

    Kill_Grey said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
    Etjama said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
    Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
    All technically true other than the Γ— 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
    Actually, they were mostly right. When we express 0.91 as 91% we are treating % as a kind of unit, so the conversion is 1.0 = 100%. To convert 0.91 into percentages, we multiply by the conversion ratio which is 100%/1.0, which is basically 100%.0.91 x 100%/1.0 = 91%.

    To be more precise, "%" is "percent" which is "out of one hundred." 100% is "100 out of 100" and to convert 0.91 into an X out of 100 we multiply by 100 out of 100 to get 0.91 x 100 out of 100 which is 91 out of 100. Multiplying by 100 out of 100 is semantically identical to multiplying by 100%.
  • IWCIWC Member Posts: 104 β˜…β˜…


    Haven’t touched this in so long... Some reason my win rate is 100% even though I lost a couple πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
  • HavocGamer49HavocGamer49 Member Posts: 408 β˜…β˜…β˜…

    Lol barely do this
  • IWCIWC Member Posts: 104 β˜…β˜…
    Wished
    Monke said:

    IWC said:



    Haven’t touched this in so long... Some reason my win rate is 100% even though I lost a couple πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

    There is one person who has defeated you

    He is the CHOSEN ONE
    Tsk tsk... He? #metoo
  • Thicco_ModeThicco_Mode Member Posts: 8,852 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    100% win rate
  • Kill_GreyKill_Grey Member Posts: 8,666 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    DNA3000 said:

    Etjama said:

    Kill_Grey said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
    Etjama said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
    Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
    All technically true other than the Γ— 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
    Actually, they were mostly right. When we express 0.91 as 91% we are treating % as a kind of unit, so the conversion is 1.0 = 100%. To convert 0.91 into percentages, we multiply by the conversion ratio which is 100%/1.0, which is basically 100%.0.91 x 100%/1.0 = 91%.

    To be more precise, "%" is "percent" which is "out of one hundred." 100% is "100 out of 100" and to convert 0.91 into an X out of 100 we multiply by 100 out of 100 to get 0.91 x 100 out of 100 which is 91 out of 100. Multiplying by 100 out of 100 is semantically identical to multiplying by 100%.
    Truly...iNsIgHtFuL!
  • Kill_GreyKill_Grey Member Posts: 8,666 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    IWC said:



    Haven’t touched this in so long... Some reason my win rate is 100% even though I lost a couple πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

    How is your longest streak so high? πŸ˜‚
    That place has the most spontaneous death matches.
  • This content has been removed.
  • shield456shield456 Member Posts: 1,980 β˜…β˜…β˜…
    I last did quick match today to test red goblin.
    And second to check my stats πŸ˜‚
    Will do in a few hrs
  • Kill_GreyKill_Grey Member Posts: 8,666 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    HI_guys said:

    DNA3000 said:

    Etjama said:

    Kill_Grey said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
    Etjama said:

    Etjama said:

    People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something πŸ˜‚.

    If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.

    that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
    Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
    Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
    All technically true other than the Γ— 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
    Actually, they were mostly right. When we express 0.91 as 91% we are treating % as a kind of unit, so the conversion is 1.0 = 100%. To convert 0.91 into percentages, we multiply by the conversion ratio which is 100%/1.0, which is basically 100%.0.91 x 100%/1.0 = 91%.

    To be more precise, "%" is "percent" which is "out of one hundred." 100% is "100 out of 100" and to convert 0.91 into an X out of 100 we multiply by 100 out of 100 to get 0.91 x 100 out of 100 which is 91 out of 100. Multiplying by 100 out of 100 is semantically identical to multiplying by 100%.
    Good god! Do people not really know how to convert numbers to percentage? Or is this just a convention misunderstanding?
    WhAt Do YoU mEaN?
  • THEBOSS2244THEBOSS2244 Member Posts: 18 β˜…

  • IWCIWC Member Posts: 104 β˜…β˜…
    Kill_Grey said:

    IWC said:



    Haven’t touched this in so long... Some reason my win rate is 100% even though I lost a couple πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

    How is your longest streak so high? πŸ˜‚
    That place has the most spontaneous death matches.
    I got the Warbound title - playing through death matches is like one of the main criteria :#
  • Kill_GreyKill_Grey Member Posts: 8,666 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    IWC said:

    Kill_Grey said:

    IWC said:



    Haven’t touched this in so long... Some reason my win rate is 100% even though I lost a couple πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

    How is your longest streak so high? πŸ˜‚
    That place has the most spontaneous death matches.
    I got the Warbound title - playing through death matches is like one of the main criteria :#
    1st in 5* featured?
  • DjinDjin Member Posts: 1,962 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…

Sign In or Register to comment.