People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
All technically true other than the Γ 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
All technically true other than the Γ 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
I put it like that so that the unit(%) can be explicit. A proper fraction multiplied by 100 would just give rise to another fraction if the context isn't clearly stated. For conventional sake, that's how a fraction-percentage calculation is formally written.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
All technically true other than the Γ 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
I put it like that so that the unit(%) can be explicit. A proper fraction multiplied by 100 would just give rise to another fraction if the context isn't clearly stated. For conventional sake, that's how a fraction-percentage calculation is formally written.
Not really. Fractions and percentages are practically the same thing. Multiplying an improper fraction by 100% is the exact same as multiplying it by 100/100 which doesn't change anything. If you want the win rate to be correct and also want the final answer to be a percentage when initially using fractions, you multiply it by 10,000%.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
All technically true other than the Γ 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
Actually, they were mostly right. When we express 0.91 as 91% we are treating % as a kind of unit, so the conversion is 1.0 = 100%. To convert 0.91 into percentages, we multiply by the conversion ratio which is 100%/1.0, which is basically 100%.0.91 x 100%/1.0 = 91%.
To be more precise, "%" is "percent" which is "out of one hundred." 100% is "100 out of 100" and to convert 0.91 into an X out of 100 we multiply by 100 out of 100 to get 0.91 x 100 out of 100 which is 91 out of 100. Multiplying by 100 out of 100 is semantically identical to multiplying by 100%.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
All technically true other than the Γ 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
Actually, they were mostly right. When we express 0.91 as 91% we are treating % as a kind of unit, so the conversion is 1.0 = 100%. To convert 0.91 into percentages, we multiply by the conversion ratio which is 100%/1.0, which is basically 100%.0.91 x 100%/1.0 = 91%.
To be more precise, "%" is "percent" which is "out of one hundred." 100% is "100 out of 100" and to convert 0.91 into an X out of 100 we multiply by 100 out of 100 to get 0.91 x 100 out of 100 which is 91 out of 100. Multiplying by 100 out of 100 is semantically identical to multiplying by 100%.
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math. (I mean technically then can round up as its 90.9 but still 90%)
People actually do those? I think the last time I did one is when I wanted to try out my first maxed 4* or something π. If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
that should be 90% lol kabam cannot do math.
Lol, I was thinking the same thing.
Actually, I believe the math is pretty on point. The win rate is calculated as a ratio of wins to total fights done and expressed as a percentage. In the case of @Etjama, his total no. of fights is 400+40=440. Win rate would be 400/440 multiplied by 100% which would round up to 91% at the end of the day, and not 90% as would be assumed at first glance.
All technically true other than the Γ 100% part. Multiplying something by 100% is the same as multiplying it by one and it doesn't change. You need to multiply it by 100, not 100%.
Actually, they were mostly right. When we express 0.91 as 91% we are treating % as a kind of unit, so the conversion is 1.0 = 100%. To convert 0.91 into percentages, we multiply by the conversion ratio which is 100%/1.0, which is basically 100%.0.91 x 100%/1.0 = 91%.
To be more precise, "%" is "percent" which is "out of one hundred." 100% is "100 out of 100" and to convert 0.91 into an X out of 100 we multiply by 100 out of 100 to get 0.91 x 100 out of 100 which is 91 out of 100. Multiplying by 100 out of 100 is semantically identical to multiplying by 100%.
Good god! Do people not really know how to convert numbers to percentage? Or is this just a convention misunderstanding?
Comments
If I was to start doing them now, I'm pretty darn sure my win rate would be 100%.
To be more precise, "%" is "percent" which is "out of one hundred." 100% is "100 out of 100" and to convert 0.91 into an X out of 100 we multiply by 100 out of 100 to get 0.91 x 100 out of 100 which is 91 out of 100. Multiplying by 100 out of 100 is semantically identical to multiplying by 100%.
Havenβt touched this in so long... Some reason my win rate is 100% even though I lost a couple π€·ββοΈ
Lol barely do this
That place has the most spontaneous death matches.
And second to check my stats π
Will do in a few hrs