So another defeat in a war we should clearly have won
Robbo101
Member Posts: 72 ★
Yes,you’ve issued a statement saying changes are coming... but another war people put a lot of effort into only to get nothing at all...despite killing more in attack and defence and it’s the final straw for some members of our alliance on top of all of the other rubbish that has happened in the last 6 months or so... so yet again not only have people left our alliance right on top of a new AQ but they have quit the game... come on Kabam.. it pathetic... you’re a gaming company.. how could you not see that your attempt to force people to spend loads of cash upgrading champs they only really used in arenas under the guise of diversity would lead to this?
How many wars in history have been won because one side have a more diverse army or armies? I can just imagine Ceaser or Churchill trying to claim a victory in a war because their forces were ‘more diverse’.... stupidity caused by profit blindness!!
If your opponents defence smash your attack... tough... that’s the name of the game...
“Oi Hitler.... lay down your arms... the allies are more diverse than the Axis.... and diversity rules all” there... War over day 1.
In the mean time we’ll try to find people when most know they’ll have too long to wait to claim any rewards!
Stop looking for quick profits and sort out the issues that needed sorting... quick profits now will mean nothing when your player base have all gone!
Jesus... it’s becoming less fun by the day and more of a pain...
You had a great game and a little common sense would keep it fresh and interesting... instead you seem hell bent on ruining it!
How many wars in history have been won because one side have a more diverse army or armies? I can just imagine Ceaser or Churchill trying to claim a victory in a war because their forces were ‘more diverse’.... stupidity caused by profit blindness!!
If your opponents defence smash your attack... tough... that’s the name of the game...
“Oi Hitler.... lay down your arms... the allies are more diverse than the Axis.... and diversity rules all” there... War over day 1.
In the mean time we’ll try to find people when most know they’ll have too long to wait to claim any rewards!
Stop looking for quick profits and sort out the issues that needed sorting... quick profits now will mean nothing when your player base have all gone!
Jesus... it’s becoming less fun by the day and more of a pain...
You had a great game and a little common sense would keep it fresh and interesting... instead you seem hell bent on ruining it!
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
It's an adjustment. The way Wars were led to several issues. Including the idea that the only Champs that matter are the ones getting Kills. I never suggested you separate your Ally. I also didn't suggest you Rank everything all at once. There is a new system that we are adjusting to, which means we may not be rocking steady Wins until we adjust. The point I'm making is if the idea is that it shouldn't happen, and people are ignoring the system currently in place, then there's not much room to wonder why a Loss came.
The fact is, for many reasons, it's here. It would be more prudent to pay attention to the current metrics and make an effort.
But......they keep changing it. Current metrics mean nothing if they change. Why would anyone rank a champ they don't like now for diversity's sake when it can change in a week's time?
Why would they make winning wars dependent on us ranking up champs we don't like? Money? Or is this just terrible decisions?
They're about to lose a lot of players because war is so bad and it was the last redeeming aspect of the game. My alliance is fed up with the new war and have a hard time filling two bgs because of the lack of interest.
They have made a few changes, but it's pretty clear Diversity is not going anywhere.
I feel like you’re forgetting that the point of a war is that 2 sides fight and the idea is that the stronger side wins.
Of course In the really low war brackets many probably don’t fill out their war groups so one side gets it easy anyways.
Defender kills should be brought back, though diversity should stay to thin the horde of magik/dormammu a little. And this is coming from someone in an alliance that has won 7 of the last 8 wars due to defender diversity, where as before we won on average 50% of wars.
The alliance wide diversity to bg diversity is a pretty huge difference. While I like bg by bg better, this is just an example of a rather large shift in their tune from a week previous.
That's funny ..in another post you told people they should have waited because your against rtds. Your telling people to adapt here and rank up different champs while in a completely different senerio your saying that a person shouldn't have. That's awesome.
It is a shift from what we had originally intended, but this decision was made based on the feedback we collected from all of you. While we are still working towards the goals we had set from the get-go of this new iteration of Alliance Wars, we've been taking into account the feedback that players have provided.
The goal is still to have Defender Diversity as a tie breaking scoring mechanic, and not the way that it currently functions. We've said this since the first post we made on changes to Alliance Wars last week. We're still moving towards that, and will have more information on exactly how we'll be doing it coming next week!
For now, I'm closing this thread down. Please remember to keep your feedback on the new Alliance Wars in the official discussion thread.