Why the hell is there no distinction between Cavalier and Uncollected in Glory Store ?

2»

Comments

  • Sarvanga1_Sarvanga1_ Member Posts: 4,157 ★★★★★
    Rewards for cav should not be the same as
    Uncollected.
  • Bugmat78Bugmat78 Member Posts: 2,383 ★★★★★
    Lormif said:

    Bugmat78 said:

    Poorly thought out update. Beating 5.2 is not equal to beating 6.1 (much less clearing act 6 and just not having a full t5cc).

    Cav EQ was brought in to differentiate the wide array of cavaliers... but now we've been lumped in with Uncollected in a key game resource. That makes little sense (apart from wanting ppl to spend to get t5cc).

    They have always been lumped together in the glory store, stop acting like this is something new.
    Notice what I said? Poorly thought out change - if they are changing things and tiering based on titles (which now include an additional level), and have been doing that in things like side quests (where uncollected have access to less resources than cavaliers), then they should do it similarly in the glory store and tier the prices.

    I really dont care that cavaliers don't have access to t5cc in the glry store if that's the chosen marker - thats not going to happen because they want to monetize title progression, but they should tier the cost of the resources available in the same way they have in other stores introduced over the past few months. Cavs sholdbe using less glory than uncollected irregardless of how mch less those same resoruces will cost for throne rbeakers.

    it wasn't tiered before - it was group lumped. They are tiering it now - should have done it better, because the gap between a newly uncollected (who hasn't even finished act 5) and even an average cavalier is more vast, than a throne breaker and an experienced cavalier.
  • MoosetiptronicMoosetiptronic Member Posts: 2,160 ★★★★
    @Masterdux well said that man.
  • This content has been removed.
  • edited November 2020
    This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.