Throne Breaker Compromise

2»

Comments

  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,024 ★★★★★

    tafre said:

    Monk1 said:

    Monk1 said:

    1 r3 in this current age is no issue for anyone running 7x5 aq and doing decent level war..

    The problem always comes back to people thinking they can’t rank up a perceived ‘non god’ r3 champ

    The vast majority of the people upset with the requirements aren't doing that for AQ/AW though. I'm sure there are some unlucky outliers but most I've seen are running map 6 with minimal modifiers or even map 5 for AQ.
    Exactly. If your not playing the highest content available regular then can’t moan that others are ahead.

    I mean what even is map 5 and 6 😂
    Lol. 1-5 is straightforward. 6 can be annoying. No experience with 7.
    Map 6 annoying? No Map 7 where you have been able to get weekly t5cc shards for a few months? Maybe there is a reason why you are not yet Thronebreaker, other than the requirements...

    I wish Kabam kept the TB title to Abyss 100% like they initially intended to avoid so many ppl complaining about RNG. They actually lowered their standard and have an extremely lower requirement compared to their initial one. It is not the end of the world that ppl do not have the title, you can certainly work towards it.
    My roster isn't able to do 7x5 lol. Plus, my schedule wouldn't fit for it. Maybe one day.
    You can't do map 7x5 but expect them to change TB requirements? If you can't do map 7x5 how do you ever hope to do abyss?
  • edited November 2020
    This content has been removed.
  • WorknprogressWorknprogress Member Posts: 7,233 ★★★★★
    edited November 2020
    Gmonkey said:

    I am always curious how many 6 stars these people wanting easier access to thronebreaker have?
    My main has 80+, was over 50 when I first rank 3 champ, my alt which just got thronebreaker today, did abyss run has 47.

    Usually but not always far less than that. Someone made a thread the other day complaining about it and had I think 16 IIRC
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,024 ★★★★★

    tafre said:

    Monk1 said:

    Monk1 said:

    1 r3 in this current age is no issue for anyone running 7x5 aq and doing decent level war..

    The problem always comes back to people thinking they can’t rank up a perceived ‘non god’ r3 champ

    The vast majority of the people upset with the requirements aren't doing that for AQ/AW though. I'm sure there are some unlucky outliers but most I've seen are running map 6 with minimal modifiers or even map 5 for AQ.
    Exactly. If your not playing the highest content available regular then can’t moan that others are ahead.

    I mean what even is map 5 and 6 😂
    Lol. 1-5 is straightforward. 6 can be annoying. No experience with 7.
    Map 6 annoying? No Map 7 where you have been able to get weekly t5cc shards for a few months? Maybe there is a reason why you are not yet Thronebreaker, other than the requirements...

    I wish Kabam kept the TB title to Abyss 100% like they initially intended to avoid so many ppl complaining about RNG. They actually lowered their standard and have an extremely lower requirement compared to their initial one. It is not the end of the world that ppl do not have the title, you can certainly work towards it.
    My roster isn't able to do 7x5 lol. Plus, my schedule wouldn't fit for it. Maybe one day.
    You can't do map 7x5 but expect them to change TB requirements? If you can't do map 7x5 how do you ever hope to do abyss?
    Lol with my 5/65s ofc. I have 5/65 sig 200 aegon, r2 6 star torch, 5/65 nick and 4/55 SS. Heimdall 5th spot due to no suicides.
    You find map 6 annoying... You'll hate abyss.
  • This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,024 ★★★★★

    tafre said:

    tafre said:

    Monk1 said:

    Monk1 said:

    1 r3 in this current age is no issue for anyone running 7x5 aq and doing decent level war..

    The problem always comes back to people thinking they can’t rank up a perceived ‘non god’ r3 champ

    The vast majority of the people upset with the requirements aren't doing that for AQ/AW though. I'm sure there are some unlucky outliers but most I've seen are running map 6 with minimal modifiers or even map 5 for AQ.
    Exactly. If your not playing the highest content available regular then can’t moan that others are ahead.

    I mean what even is map 5 and 6 😂
    Lol. 1-5 is straightforward. 6 can be annoying. No experience with 7.
    Map 6 annoying? No Map 7 where you have been able to get weekly t5cc shards for a few months? Maybe there is a reason why you are not yet Thronebreaker, other than the requirements...

    I wish Kabam kept the TB title to Abyss 100% like they initially intended to avoid so many ppl complaining about RNG. They actually lowered their standard and have an extremely lower requirement compared to their initial one. It is not the end of the world that ppl do not have the title, you can certainly work towards it.
    My roster isn't able to do 7x5 lol. Plus, my schedule wouldn't fit for it. Maybe one day.

    Monk1 said:

    Monk1 said:

    1 r3 in this current age is no issue for anyone running 7x5 aq and doing decent level war..

    The problem always comes back to people thinking they can’t rank up a perceived ‘non god’ r3 champ

    The vast majority of the people upset with the requirements aren't doing that for AQ/AW though. I'm sure there are some unlucky outliers but most I've seen are running map 6 with minimal modifiers or even map 5 for AQ.
    Exactly. If your not playing the highest content available regular then can’t moan that others are ahead.

    I mean what even is map 5 and 6 😂
    Lol. 1-5 is straightforward. 6 can be annoying. No experience with 7.
    "No experience with map 7" tells me everything I need to know about your account. You sit here screaming RNG when you are only relying on 1 source for that fully formed t5cc. You aren't the type they are targeting for this title.
    Man, you're slow. SORRY, but I don't care who it's 'meant for' when things like the glory store and daily crystals come into play. I'm grinding for the title one way or another lol, just voicing my opinion.
    If your concern is something like the glory store, wouldn't be be trying to get as much glory as possible as well? Know what map gets you more glory?
    I could get into an ally that runs map 6, then ease into 7 over tiem. BUT, it's my personal choice to run 5x5 in an ally with friends instead.
    So what you are saying is you don't want to work your way towards the title by doing harder content but you are ok with complaining about how this title is obtained? Makes a lot of sense lol.
    Um no. I'm in favor of the title being 'form a t5cc'.
    Of course you are.
  • This content has been removed.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,024 ★★★★★

    Gmonkey said:

    I am always curious how many 6 stars these people wanting easier access to thronebreaker have?
    My main has 80+, was over 50 when I first rank 3 champ, my alt which just got thronebreaker today, did abyss run has 47.

    Usually but not always far less than that. Someone made a thread the other day complaining about it and had I think 16 IIRC
    I've seen as low as 10 at one point.
  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • K00shMaanK00shMaan Member Posts: 1,289 ★★★★
    I don't get bent out of shape because I don't have the Thronebreaker title even though I'm sitting on a Mystic T5CC at the moment. I understand that I'm closer to the title than I realistically should be because they made it very attainable. I just need that Mystic champ that I would use at all, even if just for AW Defense, or finish forming my first one where I've been prioritizing a class where I already have a champ I want to take up. Not really complaining but there are two things about the title I found annoying. Firstly, I bet at least 50% of Thronebreakers have done more or less the exact same things that I have but had the RNG fall their way. I've done Act 6 Completion and done the Abyss Completion but have yet to form one another way yet. I just didn't end up with exactly what I needed. Secondly, because there was no precedent set for title progression to include ranking a champion, I wasn't doing all that I could to gather T5CC since it was introduced because it didn't appear to be a priority. With one piece of in game mail, T5CC went some something I wasn't concerned about at all really to one of very high importance and I was unfortunately a little further behind than I could've been if something like that had been communicated earlier.
  • Troy_Elric123Troy_Elric123 Member Posts: 542 ★★★
    Monk1 said:

    The basic problem is making the bar too low for TB in first place.

    I should of always been locked behind 100% act 6 (before they nerf it to the ground)

    Yeah this is why kabam can get away with anything
  • DannyB01DannyB01 Member Posts: 471 ★★★
    There's nothing wrong with this idea! But it's not going to happen.

    Frankly, Thronebreaker was the original title for 100% act 6 and that SHOULD have been the requirement. Someone at Kabam didn't like how focused that is on grinding/skill, so chose to add the R3 6* requirement and make the content milestone easier to achieve. Don't see it being undone.
Sign In or Register to comment.