DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Summary: Coldness is the slowing of molecules. Iceman can slow molecules, but cannot stop his own molecules from being slowed.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Summary: Coldness is the slowing of molecules. Iceman can slow molecules, but cannot stop his own molecules from being slowed. Apparently sabretooth can.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science. Because you could just say balance and move on. There were a bunch of scientific essays about how ghost rider should not be immune to incinerate and look what happened.Also growth te is the freezing of surface skin and tissues . That obviously can't happen to iceman because it already is frozen. Dont know about coldsbap
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science. Because you could just say balance and move on. There were a bunch of scientific essays about how ghost rider should not be immune to incinerate and look what happened.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science. Because you could just say balance and move on. There were a bunch of scientific essays about how ghost rider should not be immune to incinerate and look what happened. And while that was an acceptable reason when he was first released, it's no longer an acceptable reason now, so I like to think of other reasons why. How is science acceptable one day and unacceptable the other when none of the variables have changed?
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science. Because you could just say balance and move on. There were a bunch of scientific essays about how ghost rider should not be immune to incinerate and look what happened. And while that was an acceptable reason when he was first released, it's no longer an acceptable reason now, so I like to think of other reasons why.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science. Tell me how science proves that Sabretooth should be Coldsnap immune and I'd agree with you. You're right, Science does prove that Iceman shouldn't be Coldsnap immune. But that explanation turns to sh*t when you consider there are Coldsnap immunes in the game. You can try to justify it, but it's just unjustifiable.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science. Tell me how science proves that Sabretooth should be Coldsnap immune and I'd agree with you. You're right, Science does prove that Iceman shouldn't be Coldsnap immune. But that explanation turns to sh*t when you consider there are Coldsnap immunes in the game. You can try to justify it, but it's just unjustifiable. Did I ever say that it was scientifically logical that Sabertooth is Immune to Coldsnap? No. I only said that it makes sense why Iceman isn't Immune. I agree that Sabertooth shouldn't be Immune and rather be Resistant to Coldsnap. You fail to see that just because I'm saying Iceman isn't Immune to Coldsnap doesn't mean I'm justifying why Sabertooth is.
DNA gave a detailed explanation to this somewhere, I forgot, but it was essentially talking about how Iceman has the ability to lower the kinetic energy of an object or surrounding objects. Heat is a form of kinetic energy, as molecules move and thus create heat. Since what we perceive as "cold" isn't heat but the lack thereof, and we know that slower-moving molecules give off less heat than faster-moving molecules, we can infer that Iceman can change the kinetic energy of objects, and more precisely, lower the kinetic energy.However, this ability doesn't prevent Iceman's molecules from being slowed down. This is where Iceman's lack of immunity to Coldsnap and Frostbite effects comes in. Iceman isn't immune to kinetic energy reduction. Yes, I love when people disagree with science. Tell me how science proves that Sabretooth should be Coldsnap immune and I'd agree with you. You're right, Science does prove that Iceman shouldn't be Coldsnap immune. But that explanation turns to sh*t when you consider there are Coldsnap immunes in the game. You can try to justify it, but it's just unjustifiable. Did I ever say that it was scientifically logical that Sabertooth is Immune to Coldsnap? No. I only said that it makes sense why Iceman isn't Immune. I agree that Sabertooth shouldn't be Immune and rather be Resistant to Coldsnap. You fail to see that just because I'm saying Iceman isn't Immune to Coldsnap doesn't mean I'm justifying why Sabertooth is. But you can't use that reasoning to justify Iceman's being Coldsnap immune when Sabretooth, Corvus, etc. are immune. It makes that reasoning moot. It's like me saying Warlock shouldn't be immune to poison because some acids classify as poison and acids can still effect Warlock when frickin Mysterio is immune to poison. It doesn't make sense.
God, you're not understanding at all. The point is that A and B undeniably are immune. Should they be? No. But they are. So there's no logical reason as to why Iceman isn't immune, other than that Kabam wills it so. Trying to justify it with Science is pointless cause if that actually mattered, there would be no Coldsnap immune characters.
God, you're not understanding at all. The point is that A and B undeniably are immune. Should they be? No. But they are. So there's no logical reason as to why Iceman isn't immune, other than that Kabam wills it so. Trying to justify it with Science is pointless cause if that actually mattered, there would be no Coldsnap immune characters. And I could say the likewise to you. I agree that A and B should not be Immune. So why should that influence whether or not Iceman is Immune? The only reasoning behind making Iceman immune is because other characters who shouldn't be Immune are. How is that logical at all?
God, you're not understanding at all. The point is that A and B undeniably are immune. Should they be? No. But they are. So there's no logical reason as to why Iceman isn't immune, other than that Kabam wills it so. Trying to justify it with Science is pointless cause if that actually mattered, there would be no Coldsnap immune characters. And I could say the likewise to you. I agree that A and B should not be Immune. So why should that influence whether or not Iceman is Immune? The only reasoning behind making Iceman immune is because other characters who shouldn't be Immune are. How is that logical at all? I never said he should be immune, I don't think he should be. No character should. But trying to justify his not being Coldsnap immune is idiotic when that same reasoning applies to every single character in the game. There are Coldsnap immune characters so that's obviously not the reason why. The only reason he's not Coldsnap immune is because Kabam doesn't want him to be Coldsnap immune.