You're comparing him to a champion that has the highest attack in the game? Of course he's going to be weaker if SL has a higher combo. Even with the tier difference.
I don't think Blade was ever hyped to be like Starlord in terms of raw damage. He just has utility. It might be a different story if you saw him fight a dimensional being like Dormammu, Mephisto, or Magik (he gets increased attack power).
You're comparing him to a champion that has the highest attack in the game? Of course he's going to be weaker if SL has a higher combo. Even with the tier difference.
You realize it’s a 2* starlord in the video right?
You're comparing him to a champion that has the highest attack in the game? Of course he's going to be weaker if SL has a higher combo. Even with the tier difference.
You realize it’s a 2* starlord in the video right?
i just ranked my 4* blade to r3. with courage, assassin, deep wounds, and mutant crit team, took 758 hits for ws. that could have been lower if i went below 50% health sooner, but it seems pretty good to me.
So looks like he's got average or higher damage output then. How's his regen?
You're comparing him to a champion that has the highest attack in the game? Of course he's going to be weaker if SL has a higher combo. Even with the tier difference.
You realize it’s a 2* starlord in the video right?
"Even with the tier difference."
Yes thank you. I make that distinction on purpose.
Let's take 2* SL versus 4* Blade. My 2* SL is max sig. He has a base attack of 173. His sig at 99 4/40 gives him an additional 8.71 attack per hit of the combo meter. Let's say Blade has a base attack of 1,200 (an average 5/50's attack stat roughly). After some calculations, it will take SL roughly 117.79 (round up to 118) hits until SL reaches Blade's attack and hit 119 will start to surpass Blade's attack. This means if you can keep a combo above 118 SL becomes the superior champ, even as a 2*. With SL doing 500 hits and Blade doing 700, SL easily beats out Blade in terms of raw damage output, but not limited to Blade. You could say that about Medusa, Angela, AA, or Iceman. The only champ a 2* SL couldn't surpass is obviously another SL of a higher tier. This is what I meant by SL having the highest attack in the game even with the tier difference.
There is also one more aspect of comparing champs that bugs me, and that's hits to kill. You cannot effectively compare champs on hits to kill. When using SL, his specials only hit once using an L1, or twice using an L2. Blade's L1 is 3 hits and his L2 is 9 hits, so of course Blade's hits are going to rack up a lot faster. The more important aspect is the time to kill. SL will most likely still kill quicker with a higher attack and his L2 doing massive damage, but if you compare him to Medusa or Mephisto, I think time to kill is the more important testing element.
Comments
I saw a video of a 2/20 sig 5 and it was pretty decent actually. I'm looking forward to seeing a 20+ sig.
I know its Star Lord, but its a 2* Star Lord vs a 4* Blade
You realize it’s a 2* starlord in the video right?
"Even with the tier difference."
So looks like he's got average or higher damage output then. How's his regen?
Though I only fought with him once so far so I need to fight with him a bit more before pass judgement on him.
Gp won't be back until she gets added to the basic pool
She bleeds more, her regen is more stable, and she has some extra built in armor and her phantasm
Sorry but the Iron Maiden beats the Daywalker in EVERY sense!
Yes thank you. I make that distinction on purpose.
Let's take 2* SL versus 4* Blade. My 2* SL is max sig. He has a base attack of 173. His sig at 99 4/40 gives him an additional 8.71 attack per hit of the combo meter. Let's say Blade has a base attack of 1,200 (an average 5/50's attack stat roughly). After some calculations, it will take SL roughly 117.79 (round up to 118) hits until SL reaches Blade's attack and hit 119 will start to surpass Blade's attack. This means if you can keep a combo above 118 SL becomes the superior champ, even as a 2*. With SL doing 500 hits and Blade doing 700, SL easily beats out Blade in terms of raw damage output, but not limited to Blade. You could say that about Medusa, Angela, AA, or Iceman. The only champ a 2* SL couldn't surpass is obviously another SL of a higher tier. This is what I meant by SL having the highest attack in the game even with the tier difference.
There is also one more aspect of comparing champs that bugs me, and that's hits to kill. You cannot effectively compare champs on hits to kill. When using SL, his specials only hit once using an L1, or twice using an L2. Blade's L1 is 3 hits and his L2 is 9 hits, so of course Blade's hits are going to rack up a lot faster. The more important aspect is the time to kill. SL will most likely still kill quicker with a higher attack and his L2 doing massive damage, but if you compare him to Medusa or Mephisto, I think time to kill is the more important testing element.
Enlighten us.
So clueless