Mysteriously, Comments Not Refreshing Threads to Top of Recent Discussions?

TyphoonTyphoon Member Posts: 1,892 ★★★★★
in General Discussion
Lately I've noticed that commenting on some certain threads does not refresh the discussion to the top of the Recent Discussions feed. Is this being done intentionally? Seems like this makes it easier for certain controversial threads to get buried easier...

Comments

  • DrZolaDrZola Member Posts: 9,544 ★★★★★
    At a minimum, the General feed and the Bugs feed should be at the top of the Recent Discussions, and I would argue that Strategy should as well since new content is out and will continue to come out this week (if the new practice is to send every thread asking for counters there).

    Dr. Zola
  • SpideyFunkoSpideyFunko Member Posts: 21,967 ★★★★★
    I’ve always stuck with general discussion instead of recent ones

    Is recent better?
  • TyphoonTyphoon Member Posts: 1,892 ★★★★★
    SpideyFunko said:

    I’ve always stuck with general discussion instead of recent ones

    Is recent better?

    I prefer recent discussions because it shows you the discussions that people are active in, or newer items.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,133 ★★★★★
    The whole "Bump" theory is wrong. Bumping Threads doesn't get them more attention. Moderators have Threads Bookmarked.
  • DrZolaDrZola Member Posts: 9,544 ★★★★★
    Recent sometimes includes ally recruitment which can get clogged.

    Dr. Zola
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 13,975 Guardian
    “Recent Discussions”, from the top menu bar labeled just “Discussions”, is just a combination of most of the categories into a single list of threads (General, Bugs, Requests, Recruiting, etc. while a couple groups are excluded like Meetups).

    And, I find it easy enough to just have my mind skip over the Recruitment ones because the name of that category is longer verbiage and my mind just naturally ignores them.

    I believe some occasionally get marked as “non-bumping” while not necessarily being closed when there is no further point in continuing to ask “any update”, “any update” every day, or sufficiently discussed while still waiting on final resolutions (so left open) but without need to constantly pull in more ppl echoing just the same thing, or leaving the discussion available for those who had already been discussing a specific issue or those who had given replies (still gets Notifications when updated), etc.
    So can still discuss and get notified, while not continuing to pull in even more ppl with additional confrontational/argumentative views that are not constructive to the issue.
  • TyphoonTyphoon Member Posts: 1,892 ★★★★★
    SummonerNR said:

    I believe some occasionally get marked as “non-bumping” while not necessarily being closed

    This right here is what I'm talking about.
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 13,975 Guardian
    Typhoon said:

    SummonerNR said:

    I believe some occasionally get marked as “non-bumping” while not necessarily being closed

    This right here is what I'm talking about.
    So, to answer your question, yes, that is being done intentionally.
  • TyphoonTyphoon Member Posts: 1,892 ★★★★★
    SummonerNR said:

    Typhoon said:

    SummonerNR said:

    I believe some occasionally get marked as “non-bumping” while not necessarily being closed

    This right here is what I'm talking about.
    So, to answer your question, yes, that is being done intentionally.
    Thank you, sir. Much appreciated.

    I guess I'm just a little confused as to why the INPUT SYSTEM UPDATE - SEPT 2021: DISCUSSION THREAD thread would have been marked as non-bumping when it is just over 2 weeks old and contains the most pertinent information pertaining to parry/dex issues.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 37,133 ★★★★★
    Typhoon said:

    GroundedWisdom said:

    The whole "Bump" theory is wrong. Bumping Threads doesn't get them more attention. Moderators have Threads Bookmarked.

    It's not a theory. When someone comments on a thread, that thread becomes the most recent item in recent discussions. When did anyone say anything about bumping threads to get them more attention with moderators? I believe you have misunderstood the message and question in this post.
    I'm talking about the idea that Threads are being silenced that way. Moderators see them either way. It's not being done to silence "controversial" topics. As for your question, yes they have the ability to stop them from pushing to the top.
  • SummonerNRSummonerNR Member, Guardian Posts: 13,975 Guardian
    Typhoon said:

    SummonerNR said:

    Typhoon said:

    SummonerNR said:

    I believe some occasionally get marked as “non-bumping” while not necessarily being closed

    This right here is what I'm talking about.
    So, to answer your question, yes, that is being done intentionally.
    Thank you, sir. Much appreciated.

    I guess I'm just a little confused as to why the INPUT SYSTEM UPDATE - SEPT 2021: DISCUSSION THREAD thread would have been marked as non-bumping when it is just over 2 weeks old and contains the most pertinent information pertaining to parry/dex issues.
    Probably because that thread was for conveying what (one) of the problems was and progress on trying to get that part resolved. Instead of after 7 pages of comments turning it into “want more compensation”.
  • TyphoonTyphoon Member Posts: 1,892 ★★★★★
    SummonerNR said:

    Typhoon said:

    SummonerNR said:

    Typhoon said:

    SummonerNR said:

    I believe some occasionally get marked as “non-bumping” while not necessarily being closed

    This right here is what I'm talking about.
    So, to answer your question, yes, that is being done intentionally.
    Thank you, sir. Much appreciated.

    I guess I'm just a little confused as to why the INPUT SYSTEM UPDATE - SEPT 2021: DISCUSSION THREAD thread would have been marked as non-bumping when it is just over 2 weeks old and contains the most pertinent information pertaining to parry/dex issues.
    Probably because that thread was for conveying what (one) of the problems was and progress on trying to get that part resolved. Instead of after 7 pages of comments turning it into “want more compensation”.
    Understandable. Thanks again.
Sign In or Register to comment.