Does dupe of 5 star or 6 star champions need to be more rewarding than 4 star(in iso8)

VyaspatOfficial

Well as you know duping even a 4 star gives you the same amount of iso as that of 5 or 6 star, but I think 5 star or 6 star needs a lot of efforts to form one (we need like 10k shards per 5 or 6 star crystal) so they should be more rewarding, what do you guys think.

Crine60

Yes, they should each provide more iso than the previous rarity of dupe does. The 6* should also provide 6* shards when duped.

ZADO1991

not even a question ofc they should but kabam economics

Real_Madrid_76_2

Duping six stars is less better than duping four stars, unless that six star is an aegon or NF. Five star champs give shards which obviously give us way more opportunity to buy six stars, and six stars give lesser items than 4 stars

Unknown

This content has been removed.

Unknown

This content has been removed.

LeNoirFaineant

Crine60 said:

Yes, they should each provide more iso than the previous rarity of dupe does. The 6* should also provide 6* shards when duped.

I'm good with more ISO and gold, but 6*s should not provide 6* shards when duped.

GrandOldKai

We have had several topics about this.

The simplest answer is "yes."

Malreck04

I mean, a three star dupe gives more than a two star dupe, a four star dupe gives more than a three star dupe, logic dictates the pattern continue

A1_

yes completely agree. more iso8 for 5 n 6 star dupes.

A1_

dear team
MCOC has evolved over the years. From the days when 4star champion were the highest tier of champs u can get to 6star champions now.
but the rewards on duping them remains same in terms of number of iso8 whether we get 4 star or 5star or 6star champs.{ currently we r getting 25 tier 5 iso 8}

this is not fair since resources required to upgrade the champs are different for different star.
kindly look into the matter and resolve it.

awaiting positive response.

Riptide368

Real_Madrid_76_2 said:

Duping six stars is less better than duping four stars, unless that six star is an aegon or NF. Five star champs give shards which obviously give us way more opportunity to buy six stars, and six stars give lesser items than 4 stars

Less better???

Crine60

LeNoirFaineant said:

Crine60 said:

Yes, they should each provide more iso than the previous rarity of dupe does. The 6* should also provide 6* shards when duped.

I'm good with more ISO and gold, but 6*s should not provide 6* shards when duped.

If a dupe of a 5* gives 6* shards and there are no 7* shards for a 6* dupe to give why shouldn't we get 6* shards for duping a 6*?

Polygon

Crine60 said:

LeNoirFaineant said:

Crine60 said:

Yes, they should each provide more iso than the previous rarity of dupe does. The 6* should also provide 6* shards when duped.

I'm good with more ISO and gold, but 6*s should not provide 6* shards when duped.

If a dupe of a 5* gives 6* shards and there are no 7* shards for a 6* dupe to give why shouldn't we get 6* shards for duping a 6*?

I think he meant something better, but since no 7*, maybe double the 6* shard amount.

DNA3000

Crine60 said:

LeNoirFaineant said:

Crine60 said:

Yes, they should each provide more iso than the previous rarity of dupe does. The 6* should also provide 6* shards when duped.

I'm good with more ISO and gold, but 6*s should not provide 6* shards when duped.

If a dupe of a 5* gives 6* shards and there are no 7* shards for a 6* dupe to give why shouldn't we get 6* shards for duping a 6*?

Can't have it both ways. If you want to claim that duping 5* and 6* champs should provide escalating ISO and gold because this continues the pattern set by duping 2* through 4* champs, you can't also say that contrary to the established pattern that duping champions provides shards for the next higher rank, but only if it exists, and nothing until it exists, people should suddenly get 6* shards for duping 6* champs even though no champ has ever granted shards for the same rank and no top rank champ has ever granted shards for the next higher rank until that rank is announced and those shards made available in the game.

Crine60

DNA3000 said:

Crine60 said:

LeNoirFaineant said:

Crine60 said:

Yes, they should each provide more iso than the previous rarity of dupe does. The 6* should also provide 6* shards when duped.

I'm good with more ISO and gold, but 6*s should not provide 6* shards when duped.

If a dupe of a 5* gives 6* shards and there are no 7* shards for a 6* dupe to give why shouldn't we get 6* shards for duping a 6*?

Can't have it both ways. If you want to claim that duping 5* and 6* champs should provide escalating ISO and gold because this continues the pattern set by duping 2* through 4* champs, you can't also say that contrary to the established pattern that duping champions provides shards for the next higher rank, but only if it exists, and nothing until it exists, people should suddenly get 6* shards for duping 6* champs even though no champ has ever granted shards for the same rank and no top rank champ has ever granted shards for the next higher rank until that rank is announced and those shards made available in the game.

I'm not trying to have it both ways. It stands to reason that since each rarity of crystal is harder to form (in obtaining shards and in the case of 5 and 6 * in the amount of shards it takes compared to the lower ones) each dupe should provide more than that lower rarity. Just because when there were no 6* a 5* didn't provide 6* shards or 5* shards doesn't mean that now they shouldn't provide something in terms of shards for duping a 6* until 7* champs come out. They can easily provide double the 6* shards for a 6* dupe as you get for a 5* dupe and when/if 7* champs come out they can switch it to 7* shards.

I am not saying lower rarity champ dupes should provide the same rarity shards but how is it unreasonable that you should get shards for duping the highest and most difficult to obtain rarity champs in the game at any given time?

It is not game breaking to provide 6* shards for duping a 6* if we can get them for duping a 5*, nor is it game breaking to do so at the same time as providing some sort of increase in iso from a 5 and 6* dupe over the 4*. There is no rule that says we can't ask for a reasonable increase in dupe rewards based on the difficulty of obtaining a specific rarity of champs over others while at the same time asking for fairness and logic in providing the shards as well.

LeNoirFaineant

Crine60 said:

LeNoirFaineant said:

Crine60 said:

Yes, they should each provide more iso than the previous rarity of dupe does. The 6* should also provide 6* shards when duped.

I'm good with more ISO and gold, but 6*s should not provide 6* shards when duped.

If a dupe of a 5* gives 6* shards and there are no 7* shards for a 6* dupe to give why shouldn't we get 6* shards for duping a 6*?

Because we didn't get 4* shards for duping 4*s when there were no 5*s, and we didn't get 5* shards for duping 5*s when there were no 6*s. No rarity has ever given more shards for itself. I don't see why the game should suddenly work differently because 6*s.