Battlegrounds season 3

Then per your logic a 50M rating alliance should be allowed to verse a 20M rating one if they're both in gold 3... There's a reason this doesn't happen in alliance wars, why are you still trying to argue against this lol if you want easy fights just say so instead of trying to act smart

You're over here claiming they had easy matches but 1. You're not a developer so you don't know the actual stats and 2. You're not everyone so you don't speak for everyone lol not to mention you're the one crying that sandbagging is getting removed.

Easy ride? Cause they're versing other players that are just as strong as them roster and skill wise? If you're Paragon and you can't beat other Paragons then get good, that's a skill issue on your part not ours buddy.

Don't take that Ironman3000 guy seriously, you can easily tell he doesn't care about game balance in the slightest.

If a player can't beat a player with half a deck of 2* champs, then they should stay in the lower tiers while the players with the bigger accounts move up. That's how it should work.

If a Player needs to throw in a half a deck of 2*s to get Matches that are easier than their own league, then they don't really earn anything based on skill.

Actually, the reason that doesn't happen is because AW has different multipliers depending on the ally's rating. You obviously don't remember when they cut everyone's AW rating and only matched based on ally strength and Master Allys ended in Gold and Gold allys ended in Masters. That is what they're doing in BGs and it sucks for everyone.

Now if they increased the points you got for beating a Paragon or TB then this would all sort itself out in a few days and the top players would be fast tracked to the GC instead of slugging it out in Bronze. If beating a Paragon gained you 3 points and a TB 2 points, it would fix the issue immediately.

Except you're not fighting their 2* champs you're fighting their r4 6* this guy lmao

Not facing Paragons on their way to the GC is facing easy matches. It really isn't hard to understand.

IamGrO_ot

Well…lets say the Paragon player uses 50/50 R4s/R3s and the other half is 2*s. Then he faces a deck with 30 5/65s/R2s…his defenders will be 40-45k and the other guy will have 30k defenders. He needs 4 champs to win, how is that a fair fight ?!?

You know this well, and this method is the reason why you got rewards last season. Not because of your skills, but because you messed around with smaller accounts. Your skills don't cut it against equal opponents, probably because Unitsman is your best champ and can't be used in BG. Get better and play fair 😉

There is not such thing as "Game Balance" in a competitive PVP mode. If two players are in the same tier and fighting for the same rewards then they should be able to be match against each other and the better player should move up and the lower player should not. There is nothing else that matters.

How would you feel about the NFL splitting the league in two divisions with the best 16 teams in one division and the bottom 16 teams in an other. Then they play their season, only vs teams in their division and assign playoff spots bases on overall record? That's essentially what you're arguing with BGs only its much more than 2 divisions.

If it's so easy for an Uncollected player to beat another Uncollected player why can't you as a Paragon beat other Paragons? Again, skill issue on your part, not ours.

Why should anyone expect a "fair" match in a competitive PVP mode?

And lol at someone crying about not being able to beat a Paragon with half a deck trying to call out my skill level.

No game balance in a competitive game? Mate have you ever played any PVP games at all? Every single PVP game in existence gets monthly balancing updates to... You know... Balance the game...

Except all those teams actually stand a chance against each other at the end of the day, an Uncollected player has no chance of beating a Paragon, it's impossible no matter what champions you have. You see the difference or nah?

What other competitive PVP games put everyone in the same group and fighting for the same rewards w/o any multipliers or advantages to get the top players to the top tiers as quickly as possible?

That's irrelevant to the argument in question which is "game balance doesn't exist in PVP games" (it does), nice strawman though.

I'm sorry, but isn't the aforementioned "skill" said advantage? Why rely on overpowering through Matchmaking?

For that matter, the scoring is what accounts for the skill. How much HP was taken, how much HP was kept, whether or not they K.O., how long the Match lasts. In whatever amounts, those factors are designed to account for the skill.

They rely on overpowering through matchmaking cause Unitman isn't there to save the day as per usual.

I just find the argument contradictory. They're arguing that Roster has no business being a factor, but they're judging the size of the Rosters of people advancing, and using their own to beat down whoever they want on the Leaderboard.

It's not irrelevant to the initial argument. You're now changing your argument from matchmaking within a game-mode to adjustments to the game-mode between seasons. I guess that's what happens when you don't have a good argument, you have to change the topic.