**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.

Kabam, Just remove monthly EQ is you don't want us yo play it.

Blizzard_BomberBlizzard_Bomber Posts: 34 ★
in General Discussion



33 Energies required just to reach the boss after doing all the fights?
Seriously? Creativity Max Pro Ultra?
Kabam if you want us to move away from Monthly EQ, then why don't you just remove it?
Poorly designed paths with absolute opposite champs of the class that is required on the paths and now this?
Enough to indicate that you don't want us to be attending the EQ.

Comments

  • Vegeta9001Vegeta9001 Posts: 1,339 ★★★★
    The map layout is a bit questionable this month, but no more or less energy used on average than normal and we're getting plenty back this month.
  • Blizzard_BomberBlizzard_Bomber Posts: 34 ★
    The Question is why? What's the use of putting unnecessary blank spaces? And why that can't be allowed to be saved and used in other contents instead.
  • TyEdgeTyEdge Posts: 2,965 ★★★★★
    Blizzard_Bomber said:

    The Question is why? What's the use of putting unnecessary blank spaces? And why that can't be allowed to be saved and used in other contents instead.

    Because some maps are designed with aesthetics in mind. We had the X-men and avengers logos, among others. We had a very similar circled 1 on a previous map (Titania?). The total energy usage has been pretty level since the ridiculous Nameless Guilly stuff five years ago.
  • DarkestDestroyerDarkestDestroyer Posts: 2,874 ★★★★★
    Why was that last step added in though to end the quests? Why not just leave it at the boss and the quest is over?
  • LordSmasherLordSmasher Posts: 1,359 ★★★★★
    DarkestDestroyer said:

    Why was that last step added in though to end the quests? Why not just leave it at the boss and the quest is over?

    So they could end the story proper like
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Posts: 4,209 ★★★★★
    Kabam Miike said:

    Because we wanted to have fun and show off the arrogance of Adam Warlock. It's the same amount of energy as it ever is.

    Don't lie.
    Now you got cought red handed.
    In March EQ 3.2 had 22 nodes.
    This month only 21 (which is standard).
    Y u do dis.




  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Posts: 4,209 ★★★★★
    Blizzard_Bomber said:




    33 Energies required just to reach the boss after doing all the fights?
    Seriously? Creativity Max Pro Ultra?

    Enough to indicate that you don't want us to be attending the EQ.

    I raise a counter offer:

    Reset monthly EQ after 15 days.
    I'll do it again, cuz I am alredy explored on TB.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Posts: 18,657 Guardian
    Blizzard_Bomber said:




    33 Energies required just to reach the boss after doing all the fights?
    Seriously? Creativity Max Pro Ultra?
    Kabam if you want us to move away from Monthly EQ, then why don't you just remove it?
    Poorly designed paths with absolute opposite champs of the class that is required on the paths and now this?
    Enough to indicate that you don't want us to be attending the EQ.

    Your standard of proof is highly dubious.
  • IceBobbyIceBobby Posts: 109 ★
    Kabam Miike said:

    Because we wanted to have fun and show off the arrogance of Adam Warlock. It's the same amount of energy as it ever is.

    Lol this is the same map as a few months ago and I remember the player base not liking it then either cuz of all the unnecessary path selections preventing autoplay from going thru all the portals. Fun reasoning in theory but it's rly just finding an excuse for reusing a map.
  • Blizzard_BomberBlizzard_Bomber Posts: 34 ★
    DNA3000 said:

    Blizzard_Bomber said:




    33 Energies required just to reach the boss after doing all the fights?
    Seriously? Creativity Max Pro Ultra?
    Kabam if you want us to move away from Monthly EQ, then why don't you just remove it?
    Poorly designed paths with absolute opposite champs of the class that is required on the paths and now this?
    Enough to indicate that you don't want us to be attending the EQ.

    Your standard of proof is highly dubious.
    Who said anything about proofs?😂
    Stop talking in your head to yourself 😛
  • Blizzard_BomberBlizzard_Bomber Posts: 34 ★
    Kabam Miike said:

    Because we wanted to have fun and show off the arrogance of Adam Warlock. It's the same amount of energy as it ever is.

    Yeah it indeed is Arrogant, but honestly not fun.
    The main concern behind this highlight is something what most people on this thread have either missed intentionally or unintentionally, we can compare it with all that we want from EQ 5 YEARS AGO and go the sarcasm way, but the thing is the game did not require this much of energy usage 5 years ago as it does today, although we have increased supply nowadays but yet that's not proving to be sufficient enough even with maximised usage, skipping the EQ of Cavalier and below difficulty appears to be the only way to manage.

    In an era where you get into BGs and game network drops half the time and your time and resource gets wasted straight up.
    You can't have an infinite supply of Elder's Mark as an F2P.
    Quite evidently we can cut the energy usage by a huge margin in EQ, then why shouldn't we(apart from monetary reasons ofc)?
Sign In or Register to comment.