2nd Best Cosmic

HendrossHendross Member Posts: 961 ★★★
I was (un)fortunate enough to get a rank 4 to 5 cosmic gem. However, Hercules is already rank 5. Who's next?

2nd Best Cosmic 87 votes

Hulkling
63%
DrZolabuffajrManup456NescioRayhanIshaquecfpreludeGarloDarkness275rcm201710or_Strongt123459Justcause102SidDDragonDaMaharajaXreissAnnihilator13_ItsClobberinTimejcphillips7xLunatiXxo_o 55 votes
Cosmic Ghost Rider
28%
SnakeEyes69Spity68phillgreenRepto23DRTOHoadyOZBulmktVbnmeWinterFieldsSkyLord7000BlackTuranJT_SupremeBanannaPandaendgamelockedMarvelfan30TrongNovYogesh_123IsisixkswmrElite13DerpyEagle 25 votes
Galan
5%
Akkarin23AzenstarThePredator1001AxewLops 5 votes
Hyperion
0%
Other
2%
PikoluRillian 2 votes

Comments

  • JustWantTheRewardsJustWantTheRewards Member Posts: 442 ★★★
    Cosmic Ghost Rider
    Hulkling's too easy of a nuke with most mystics. Galan and CGR are about tied for that second place spot imo
  • Noob_Master69Noob_Master69 Member Posts: 699 ★★★★
    Embrace Groot
  • ThePredator1001ThePredator1001 Member Posts: 890 ★★★★
    Galan
    Galan has the most useful utility in my opinion. A cosmic who is immune to nullify and fateseal is just so useful.
  • JustWantTheRewardsJustWantTheRewards Member Posts: 442 ★★★
    edited September 2023
    Cosmic Ghost Rider
    Emilia90 said:

    Hulkling's too easy of a nuke with most mystics. Galan and CGR are about tied for that second place spot imo

    Lmao what. CGR is useless on defense. If we’re going based on offense, Hulkling is on par with them both.
    I just disagree. I think CGR and Galan are noticably better on offense and Hulkling is only a better defender if the opponent doesn't have any good Mystics. Sure CGR isn't good on defense, but he stalls longer against Tigra, Longshot and Wiccan at least. Hulking is a 30 second win against any of those 3.
  • Emilia90Emilia90 Member Posts: 3,457 ★★★★★
    edited September 2023
    Hulkling

    Emilia90 said:

    Hulkling's too easy of a nuke with most mystics. Galan and CGR are about tied for that second place spot imo

    Lmao what. CGR is useless on defense. If we’re going based on offense, Hulkling is on par with them both.
    I just disagree. I think CGR and Galan are noticably better on offense and Hulkling is only a better defender if the opponent doesn't have any good Mystics. Sure CGR isn't good on defense, but he stalls longer against Tigra, Longshot and Wiccan at least. Hulking is a 30 second win against any of those 3.
    I have all 3 at r4 and I finish battlegrounds fights with Hulkling in under 40 seconds. He’s sustainable and has useful immunities. Gal is sustainable, but always slower it matchups where he can’t build mass faster. CGR takes more damage than both and he ends fights only a bit faster than Hulkling
  • JustWantTheRewardsJustWantTheRewards Member Posts: 442 ★★★
    Cosmic Ghost Rider
    Emilia90 said:

    Emilia90 said:

    Hulkling's too easy of a nuke with most mystics. Galan and CGR are about tied for that second place spot imo

    Lmao what. CGR is useless on defense. If we’re going based on offense, Hulkling is on par with them both.
    I just disagree. I think CGR and Galan are noticably better on offense and Hulkling is only a better defender if the opponent doesn't have any good Mystics. Sure CGR isn't good on defense, but he stalls longer against Tigra, Longshot and Wiccan at least. Hulking is a 30 second win against any of those 3.
    I have all 3 at r4 and I finish battlegrounds fights with Hulkling in under 40 seconds. He’s sustainable and has useful immunities. Gal is sustainable, but always slower it matchups where he can’t build mass faster. CGR takes more damage than both and he ends fights only a bit faster than Hulkling
    Yeah, they're all at approximately the same level. I'd just argue that Hulkling can often be as much of a disadvantage as an advantage. He's just food for mystics. If they're looking for someone to take up a spot in a BGs deck, I'd go CGR or Galan personally.
  • Emilia90Emilia90 Member Posts: 3,457 ★★★★★
    Hulkling

    Emilia90 said:

    Emilia90 said:

    Hulkling's too easy of a nuke with most mystics. Galan and CGR are about tied for that second place spot imo

    Lmao what. CGR is useless on defense. If we’re going based on offense, Hulkling is on par with them both.
    I just disagree. I think CGR and Galan are noticably better on offense and Hulkling is only a better defender if the opponent doesn't have any good Mystics. Sure CGR isn't good on defense, but he stalls longer against Tigra, Longshot and Wiccan at least. Hulking is a 30 second win against any of those 3.
    I have all 3 at r4 and I finish battlegrounds fights with Hulkling in under 40 seconds. He’s sustainable and has useful immunities. Gal is sustainable, but always slower it matchups where he can’t build mass faster. CGR takes more damage than both and he ends fights only a bit faster than Hulkling
    Yeah, they're all at approximately the same level. I'd just argue that Hulkling can often be as much of a disadvantage as an advantage. He's just food for mystics. If they're looking for someone to take up a spot in a BGs deck, I'd go CGR or Galan personally.
    I mean I guess, but I’ve used him as a defender bunches and if they don’t have Wiccan, Tigra, or another direct counter, they usually take a lot of chip damage. Most people I’ve faced never even draft Wiccan too so that’s probably why lol. I usually bait Tigra and place Hulkling in the 3rd round if I’m not gonna use him offensively.

    I have all 3 in my deck and they’re amazing. Nice to have 3 cosmic nukes to choose from
  • Elite13Elite13 Member Posts: 184
    Cosmic Ghost Rider
    CGR, HULKLING, OR GALAN
  • ThePredator1001ThePredator1001 Member Posts: 890 ★★★★
    Galan
    Emilia90 said:

    Emilia90 said:

    Hulkling's too easy of a nuke with most mystics. Galan and CGR are about tied for that second place spot imo

    Lmao what. CGR is useless on defense. If we’re going based on offense, Hulkling is on par with them both.
    I just disagree. I think CGR and Galan are noticably better on offense and Hulkling is only a better defender if the opponent doesn't have any good Mystics. Sure CGR isn't good on defense, but he stalls longer against Tigra, Longshot and Wiccan at least. Hulking is a 30 second win against any of those 3.
    I have all 3 at r4 and I finish battlegrounds fights with Hulkling in under 40 seconds. He’s sustainable and has useful immunities. Gal is sustainable, but always slower it matchups where he can’t build mass faster. CGR takes more damage than both and he ends fights only a bit faster than Hulkling
    If we are going by speed CGR is absolutely the fastest as long as it’s not an unideal match up. Hulkling is also very fast but not much faster than Galan. Hulkling usually finishes fights in usually 1-2 sp2 cycles depending on the defender. Galan finishes fights in 1 sp2 harvest followed by 1 sp1 harvest. My fight times when both were at R4 were very similar.

    Galan is very fast if you know how to use him. Plus he’s the best for fighting mystic defenders, you can use him in a way where the only buffs expiring to feed mystic dispersion is the dexterity buff.

  • SlayerOfGodsSlayerOfGods Member, Content Creators Posts: 542 Content Creator
    Cosmic Ghost Rider
    I like CGR
  • BeastDadBeastDad Member Posts: 1,917 ★★★★★
    Hulkling
    Dual use, can't beat it.
  • UltragamerUltragamer Member Posts: 579 ★★★
    Hulkling

    Emilia90 said:

    Emilia90 said:

    Hulkling's too easy of a nuke with most mystics. Galan and CGR are about tied for that second place spot imo

    Lmao what. CGR is useless on defense. If we’re going based on offense, Hulkling is on par with them both.
    I just disagree. I think CGR and Galan are noticably better on offense and Hulkling is only a better defender if the opponent doesn't have any good Mystics. Sure CGR isn't good on defense, but he stalls longer against Tigra, Longshot and Wiccan at least. Hulking is a 30 second win against any of those 3.
    I have all 3 at r4 and I finish battlegrounds fights with Hulkling in under 40 seconds. He’s sustainable and has useful immunities. Gal is sustainable, but always slower it matchups where he can’t build mass faster. CGR takes more damage than both and he ends fights only a bit faster than Hulkling
    Yeah, they're all at approximately the same level. I'd just argue that Hulkling can often be as much of a disadvantage as an advantage. He's just food for mystics. If they're looking for someone to take up a spot in a BGs deck, I'd go CGR or Galan personally.
    Hulkling by far best cosmic for bgs if they don’t have a hood coun tree r he can waste time or even time them out he’s more versatile then cgr and galan I be taking mystics with mystic dispersion with him he can regen damage if you make mistakes just as fast as these two hulkling has defense versatility and utility on them
  • DerpyEagleDerpyEagle Member Posts: 608 ★★★
    Cosmic Ghost Rider

    I like CGR

    Same
  • Marvelfan30Marvelfan30 Member Posts: 1,174 ★★★★
    Cosmic Ghost Rider

    I like CGR

    Same
    Cgr #1 herc sux
  • BulmktBulmkt Member Posts: 1,645 ★★★★
    Cosmic Ghost Rider
    CGR and Galan are hard to separate.

    Hulkling IMO is overrated.
Sign In or Register to comment.