Should all champion crystals be changed to selectors? πŸ€”

MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
I think due to the increased number of champions in the game, I think we're past the 250 mark at this point, all the champion crystals should be selectors crystals. I think it's only fair since we're at a point now where your chances of getting specific character have become a 1 in 250 chance unless you're opening a featured crystal then the pool is smaller. There's nothing worse than completing a piece of everest or even SOS level content to then get a Groot or VTD. I don't see why we can't at least have 3 options so we're given a better chance at getting someone decent after grinding through content.

Should all champion crystals be changed to selectors? πŸ€” 123 votes

Yes
19%
MasterSmokehurricantSnakeEyes69Evil2devilcausticgiuppy04PrimeSaviour_27Sagacious0wlDonDudu2809Ewell65SSS69TripleBMacGyverBeastDadDkcody42XamloMarouenSilentArisMarsTheMartianUzzy131004LunerCat 24 votes
No
80%
GamerdanielmathVaniteliaBendyFeuerschwer7abo2aAzKicker316TerraKossukoseSundance_2099Uncle_Fatty_247Masterduxspiderknight616KerneasNewman0067OurobΓΈrosblurblotTJ107ThiartcSupervlinder 99 votes
Β«13

Comments

  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes
    Glassback said:

    The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine.

    Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

    Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.


    Would you agree to the selector being on general crystals with a wider pool of champions. So i.e. the basic 7* crystal having a selector but not the titan since the pool is very small and chances of getting the desired champions are greater?
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    that would flood the game with great attackers so they'd take a big loss on say featured crystals and would have to make up for it somehow by increasing cost of unit based crystals or reducing shard supply.

    i think they're already dealing with the roster size problem by designing content that values roster width more than ever like AW, sagas, and EQ is class and tag based.

    I don't think the selector is necessary on Featured crystals, I'd say more so on the general crystals that have large pools of champions.
  • GlassbackGlassback Member Posts: 648 β˜…β˜…β˜…
    No

    Glassback said:

    The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine.

    Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

    Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.


    Would you agree to the selector being on general crystals with a wider pool of champions. So i.e. the basic 7* crystal having a selector but not the titan since the pool is very small and chances of getting the desired champions are greater?
    Not a nexus, but maybe old champs like blade etc. I think the problem isn’t with the chances, it’s with the decisions for who is in the pool.
  • arifin74arifin74 Member Posts: 248 β˜…β˜…
    edited October 21
    No
    they would probably just delete the bad characters from the game, instead of keeping in crystals/game and watching no one picking or using them ever.
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes
    Adding this would only be beneficial to the player base yet most vote no. Only way you vote no to something that is beneficial to players is if you're working for Kabam.
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes
    Glassback said:

    Glassback said:

    The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine.

    Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

    Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.


    Would you agree to the selector being on general crystals with a wider pool of champions. So i.e. the basic 7* crystal having a selector but not the titan since the pool is very small and chances of getting the desired champions are greater?
    Not a nexus, but maybe old champs like blade etc. I think the problem isn’t with the chances, it’s with the decisions for who is in the pool.
    Not Nexus, that's too much. Just a normal selector that gives you 3 options. The normal 7* crystal already has 150 champions in the pool, that's a 1 in 150 chance. Think having an option of 3 of the 150 is fair enough.
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
  • KerneasKerneas Member Posts: 3,825 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    No
    There is enough great champs in the pool, so tripling the chance of pulling a top-tier champ would be unhealthy for the game.

    Also by the same logic, why is it terrible to pull VtD from SOS crystal and acceptable to pull a 7* Hulk from a random Paragon crystal? Both are equally unearnt
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,131 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    edited October 21
    No

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
    I did not, the poll did...
    Yes yes Skill is a factor and all Free players have it, its like they are born with empty pockets and superior finger movements... Sure..
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes
    Kerneas said:

    There is enough great champs in the pool, so tripling the chance of pulling a top-tier champ would be unhealthy for the game.

    Also by the same logic, why is it terrible to pull VtD from SOS crystal and acceptable to pull a 7* Hulk from a random Paragon crystal? Both are equally unearnt

    Some champions require awakening and high sig to be viable. Why should someone wait 2 years before their 7 star Namor is viable at sig 200?
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
    I did not, the poll did...
    The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
    I did not, the poll did...
    Yes yes Skill is a factor and all Free players have it, its like they are born with empty pockets and superior finger movements... Sure..
    Playing the game makes you good at the game, buying things makes you good at... uh... buying stuff?
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
    I did not, the poll did...
    The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
    So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
    Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
    No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,131 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    No

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
    I did not, the poll did...
    The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
    So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
    Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
    No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.
    My point is clear, its a gacha game, it takes time to develope a roster. You made a previous statement about taking 2 years to make Namor useful... Well if you expect to pull him 10 times yeah, but there are AGs and Sig stones... There are people with max sig Angela's... didn't take them 2 years...
    There is one guy with a max sig CMM, that definetly didn't take him 2 years...
  • MarsTheMartianMarsTheMartian Member Posts: 49 β˜…
    Yes

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
    I did not, the poll did...
    The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
    So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
    Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
    No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.
    My point is clear, its a gacha game, it takes time to develope a roster. You made a previous statement about taking 2 years to make Namor useful... Well if you expect to pull him 10 times yeah, but there are AGs and Sig stones... There are people with max sig Angela's... didn't take them 2 years...
    There is one guy with a max sig CMM, that definetly didn't take him 2 years...
    It won't take you 2 years if use the most broken characters in MCOC. A credit card.

    Yeah those thats how people got sig200 7*s from the small amount we get from content... sure...
  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 4,508 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    No

    Adding this would only be beneficial to the player base yet most vote no. Only way you vote no to something that is beneficial to players is if you're working for Kabam.

    If it's not beneficial for Kabam then game will just close out,
    Kabam is not making MCoC for fun but for money, it's crazy how people just don't understand this.

    Do you also believe that government should donate 10 million dollars to every citizen?
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 5,131 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    No

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
    There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
    I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
    Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
    Also... Ratio
    Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

    Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

    So... Ratio.
    I did not, the poll did...
    The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
    So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
    Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
    No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.
    My point is clear, its a gacha game, it takes time to develope a roster. You made a previous statement about taking 2 years to make Namor useful... Well if you expect to pull him 10 times yeah, but there are AGs and Sig stones... There are people with max sig Angela's... didn't take them 2 years...
    There is one guy with a max sig CMM, that definetly didn't take him 2 years...
    It won't take you 2 years if use the most broken characters in MCOC. A credit card.

    Yeah those thats how people got sig200 7*s from the small amount we get from content... sure...
    The only reason why tou have a game to play and enjoy is those credit cards... If everything is given the way you expect there would be no reason for spendrers to spend. I doubt you can feed the devs with your skills.... I am no nutritionist, but I don't think your superior F2P skills have any nutritional value...
  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 4,508 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    No

    I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

    Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
    There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
    Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
    Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
    But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
    If people who pay money to Kabam does not benefit and give advantage then they will just stop paying money.
    If fields are even then what's points of giving money to Kabam?
    Yes spenders should always have 100% advantage.

    But do tell us, how will Kabam make money if spenders stop,
    Should kabam try to pay bills by units farmed in Arena or should they introduce advertisement in-game where every time you click on
    1. Crystals to open there's ad
    2. Everytime you enter war, there's ad
    3. Everytime you finish round in Arena, there's ad
    4. Everytime you finish BG round, there's ad.

    Sounds awful yes?

  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 4,508 β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
    No

    Kerneas said:

    There is enough great champs in the pool, so tripling the chance of pulling a top-tier champ would be unhealthy for the game.

    Also by the same logic, why is it terrible to pull VtD from SOS crystal and acceptable to pull a 7* Hulk from a random Paragon crystal? Both are equally unearnt

    Some champions require awakening and high sig to be viable. Why should someone wait 2 years before their 7 star Namor is viable at sig 200?
    That's right, if you don't want your favourite 7* hero to be sig200 for 2 years, then you spend money,
    That's how Kabam makes profit, by giving something players to chase.

    If there's no chase, there's no spending,
    No spending, no profits to Kabam,
    No profit to Kabam, game shuts down.

Sign In or Register to comment.