Should all champion crystals be changed to selectors? 🤔

MarsTheMartian · October 21

I think due to the increased number of champions in the game, I think we're past the 250 mark at this point, all the champion crystals should be selectors crystals. I think it's only fair since we're at a point now where your chances of getting specific character have become a 1 in 250 chance unless you're opening a featured crystal then the pool is smaller. There's nothing worse than completing a piece of everest or even SOS level content to then get a Groot or VTD. I don't see why we can't at least have 3 options so we're given a better chance at getting someone decent after grinding through content.

Glassback · October 21

No

The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine. Also nexus crystals are a prize in their own right, already attributed to content that matches that level of challenge.

Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

Glassback said:
The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine.

Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.

Would you agree to the selector being on general crystals with a wider pool of champions. So i.e. the basic 7* crystal having a selector but not the titan since the pool is very small and chances of getting the desired champions are greater?

startropics · October 21

No

that would flood the game with great attackers so they'd take a big loss on say featured crystals and would have to make up for it somehow by increasing cost of unit based crystals or reducing shard supply.

i think they're already dealing with the roster size problem by designing content that values roster width more than ever like AW, sagas, and EQ (class and tag based).

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

startropics said:
that would flood the game with great attackers so they'd take a big loss on say featured crystals and would have to make up for it somehow by increasing cost of unit based crystals or reducing shard supply.

i think they're already dealing with the roster size problem by designing content that values roster width more than ever like AW, sagas, and EQ is class and tag based.

I don't think the selector is necessary on Featured crystals, I'd say more so on the general crystals that have large pools of champions.

Glassback · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

Glassback said:
The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine.

Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.

Would you agree to the selector being on general crystals with a wider pool of champions. So i.e. the basic 7* crystal having a selector but not the titan since the pool is very small and chances of getting the desired champions are greater?

Not a nexus, but maybe old champs like blade etc. I think the problem isn’t with the chances, it’s with the decisions for who is in the pool.

arifin74 · October 21

No

they would probably just delete the bad characters from the game, instead of keeping in crystals/game and watching no one picking or using them ever.

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

Adding this would only be beneficial to the player base yet most vote no. Only way you vote no to something that is beneficial to players is if you're working for Kabam.

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.

Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

Glassback said:

MarsTheMartian said:

Glassback said:
The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine.

Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.

Would you agree to the selector being on general crystals with a wider pool of champions. So i.e. the basic 7* crystal having a selector but not the titan since the pool is very small and chances of getting the desired champions are greater?
Not a nexus, but maybe old champs like blade etc. I think the problem isn’t with the chances, it’s with the decisions for who is in the pool.

Not Nexus, that's too much. Just a normal selector that gives you 3 options. The normal 7* crystal already has 150 champions in the pool, that's a 1 in 150 chance. Think having an option of 3 of the 150 is fair enough.

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?

There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.

No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?

I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio

Kerneas · October 21

No

There is enough great champs in the pool, so tripling the chance of pulling a top-tier champ would be unhealthy for the game.

Also by the same logic, why is it terrible to pull VtD from SOS crystal and acceptable to pull a 7* Hulk from a random Paragon crystal? Both are equally unearnt

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio

Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.

I did not, the poll did...
Yes yes Skill is a factor and all Free players have it, its like they are born with empty pockets and superior finger movements... Sure..

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

Kerneas said:
There is enough great champs in the pool, so tripling the chance of pulling a top-tier champ would be unhealthy for the game.

Also by the same logic, why is it terrible to pull VtD from SOS crystal and acceptable to pull a 7* Hulk from a random Paragon crystal? Both are equally unearnt

Some champions require awakening and high sig to be viable. Why should someone wait 2 years before their 7 star Namor is viable at sig 200?

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...

The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...
Yes yes Skill is a factor and all Free players have it, its like they are born with empty pockets and superior finger movements... Sure..

Playing the game makes you good at the game, buying things makes you good at... uh... buying stuff?

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...
The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".

So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...
The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...

No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...
The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.

My point is clear, its a gacha game, it takes time to develope a roster. You made a previous statement about taking 2 years to make Namor useful... Well if you expect to pull him 10 times yeah, but there are AGs and Sig stones... There are people with max sig Angela's... didn't take them 2 years...
There is one guy with a max sig CMM, that definetly didn't take him 2 years...

MarsTheMartian · October 21

Yes

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...
The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.
My point is clear, its a gacha game, it takes time to develope a roster. You made a previous statement about taking 2 years to make Namor useful... Well if you expect to pull him 10 times yeah, but there are AGs and Sig stones... There are people with max sig Angela's... didn't take them 2 years...
There is one guy with a max sig CMM, that definetly didn't take him 2 years...

It won't take you 2 years if use the most broken characters in MCOC. A credit card.

Yeah those thats how people got sig200 7*s from the small amount we get from content... sure...

captain_rogers · October 21

No

Whya Martian have an opinion of Earth Affairs?

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...
The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.
My point is clear, its a gacha game, it takes time to develope a roster. You made a previous statement about taking 2 years to make Namor useful... Well if you expect to pull him 10 times yeah, but there are AGs and Sig stones... There are people with max sig Angela's... didn't take them 2 years...
There is one guy with a max sig CMM, that definetly didn't take him 2 years...
It won't take you 2 years if use the most broken characters in MCOC. A credit card.

Yeah those thats how people got sig200 7*s from the small amount we get from content... sure...

So what did you pull that made you so upset? 🤣

PT_99 · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:
Adding this would only be beneficial to the player base yet most vote no. Only way you vote no to something that is beneficial to players is if you're working for Kabam.

If it's not beneficial for Kabam then game will just close out,
Kabam is not making MCoC for fun but for money, it's crazy how people just don't understand this.

Do you also believe that government should donate 10 million dollars to every citizen?

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
No one said use it for the featured. I think your math needs attention. 150 champions are in the basic 7* pool, giving players 3 options of the 150 is hardly game breaking or going to cause rosters to suddenly grow rapidly, accounts will grow but not as fast as you seem to think. But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?
I think you should get more familiar with the game then.
There is already Nexus Crystals, there is also class selectors, abyss nexus and so on.
I guess you are talking about 6*s cause there is not 250 champs in the 7* basic pool.
Pay 2 win? I guess I should call you Free 2 Leech, paying players keep the lights on for free players...
Also... Ratio
Lol using the word Ratio when did you no such thing is hilarious. Guess it's not just your math that needs help it's your English too. You should be in school not the Kabam forums.

Your point earlier was saying that the game would be unbalanced if all the players had good rosters? that's the complete opposite of unbalanced, if everybody had huge rosters skill would be the deciding factor, not who spent most of their daddies credit card on units and offers. Balanced and fair is when skill is the deciding factor.

So... Ratio.
I did not, the poll did...
The poll exposed hypocrisy. Spending to get massive accounts is morally correct and encouraged, playing through content skillfully however is frowned upon because we're "leeches".
So anyone who disagrees with you is a hypocrite?...
Or maybe your idea is entitled and dumb...
No not at all. Disagreements are fine, your argument was just particularly stupid because you tripped over yourself trying to make a point.
My point is clear, its a gacha game, it takes time to develope a roster. You made a previous statement about taking 2 years to make Namor useful... Well if you expect to pull him 10 times yeah, but there are AGs and Sig stones... There are people with max sig Angela's... didn't take them 2 years...
There is one guy with a max sig CMM, that definetly didn't take him 2 years...
It won't take you 2 years if use the most broken characters in MCOC. A credit card.

Yeah those thats how people got sig200 7*s from the small amount we get from content... sure...

The only reason why tou have a game to play and enjoy is those credit cards... If everything is given the way you expect there would be no reason for spendrers to spend. I doubt you can feed the devs with your skills.... I am no nutritionist, but I don't think your superior F2P skills have any nutritional value...

PT_99 · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:

MarsTheMartian said:

BringPopcorn said:
I love how people forget that this is a pro profit company and not a pro fun charity organization.
Yes we know they're pro profit but why is that a reason to vote no? Do Kabam pay you to be in the comments section and just argue against points that are beneficial to the player base?
There is a big difference between beneficial and stupid isnt it?..
Yay lets make all 7* crystals selectors.. So we can see everything filled with max sig serpents and enchantress, lets let them pick the flavour of the season so no one has to work on building a roster, you just get a crystal, select and win.
Its a no cause what you are asking is the exact contrary of a gacha game.
But funny to see that you're fine with pay to win but play to win is a "stupid" idea? People with sig 200 7*s pay for their accounts to be that way and you're fine with it. if anything, adding this feature evens the playing field with spenders and FTP. Spenders should always have the advantage right because pay to win > play to win?

If people who pay money to Kabam does not benefit and give advantage then they will just stop paying money.
If fields are even then what's points of giving money to Kabam?
Yes spenders should always have 100% advantage.

But do tell us, how will Kabam make money if spenders stop,
Should kabam try to pay bills by units farmed in Arena or should they introduce advertisement in-game where every time you click on
1. Crystals to open there's ad
2. Everytime you enter war, there's ad
3. Everytime you finish round in Arena, there's ad
4. Everytime you finish BG round, there's ad.

Sounds awful yes?

PT_99 · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

Kerneas said:
There is enough great champs in the pool, so tripling the chance of pulling a top-tier champ would be unhealthy for the game.

Also by the same logic, why is it terrible to pull VtD from SOS crystal and acceptable to pull a 7* Hulk from a random Paragon crystal? Both are equally unearnt
Some champions require awakening and high sig to be viable. Why should someone wait 2 years before their 7 star Namor is viable at sig 200?

That's right, if you don't want your favourite 7* hero to be sig200 for 2 years, then you spend money,
That's how Kabam makes profit, by giving something players to chase.

If there's no chase, there's no spending,
No spending, no profits to Kabam,
No profit to Kabam, game shuts down.

BringPopcorn · October 21

No

MarsTheMartian said:

Glassback said:

MarsTheMartian said:

Glassback said:
The RNG is a factor of the game and one that is quite important to Kabam’s business model I’d imagine.

Although I’d love to have an increased chance to have the best champs, it would make having them a bit meaningless.

Like two titans I’ve duped Nova, it made it much the feeling much better when I pulled this saucepot from my last titan.

Would you agree to the selector being on general crystals with a wider pool of champions. So i.e. the basic 7* crystal having a selector but not the titan since the pool is very small and chances of getting the desired champions are greater?
Not a nexus, but maybe old champs like blade etc. I think the problem isn’t with the chances, it’s with the decisions for who is in the pool.
Not Nexus, that's too much. Just a normal selector that gives you 3 options. The normal 7* crystal already has 150 champions in the pool, that's a 1 in 150 chance. Think having an option of 3 of the 150 is fair enough.

... That's exactly what a nexus crystal is...
I just noticed this LOL

Should all champion crystals be changed to selectors? 🤔

Should all champion crystals be changed to selectors? 🤔 123 votes

Comments