Why Did the Sentinel Buff Keep Incinerates?

2

Comments

  • OurobørosOurobøros Member Posts: 1,789 ★★★★★

    but doesn't ultron do degen against mutants?

    good call, but from a design standpoint, they leave themselves (and us) more room if that’s an exception, and not the new rule.
    Guilly 99, Warlock, Punisher 99
  • psp742psp742 Member Posts: 2,642 ★★★★

    psp742 said:

    Instead of outright plasma.. Sentinel needs to work for it just like Ironman IW.. sp1 shock, sp2 incinerate and medium or light hits will combine shock and incinerate into plasma.. maybe degen and plasma combined plasma meltdown (more damage than porker poppers).

    There’s a reason nobody plays Infinity War iron man offensively it’s because that rotation of shock into incinerate for plasma is absolutely terrible, it’s 2024 not 2018, champs should apply X debuff when immune for a substitution like rupture/bleed for morbius or degen/bleed against mutants for Ultron (example) not a conversion of debuffs
    Unfortunately, kabam did not include incinerate and/or degen in his debuffs..
    I never said Ironman IW was better, just stating possible options that kabam could add in re-buff Sentinel.. for all we know, kabam can still change incinerate to plasma debuff.. Sentinel heavy will armor shatter, as well as lowers their energy resistance by certain % each time they get hit.
  • startropicsstartropics Member Posts: 951 ★★★★
    DinoHop05 said:

    The argument for plasma is pretty meh.

    Having a champion who counters literally every opponent who they've got class advantage against doesn't make the game better - it makes for more limited choices.

    Do we really want all mutants to have zero defensive value, if the opponent has a Sentinel?

    this is probably the best message to takeaway from this thread.

    dll has implied going against the standard class identity when brainstorming champ designs and it makes sense.

    it pains me that sentinel won't work against a lot mutants but do we really need to ruin the defensive value of most of them with one champ? that's bad design. champs like nimrod hurt the game more than help.
    Of course DLL would say that, he thinks turning off masteries is good champ design.

    But regardless, I disagree with your supposed takeaway, because Sentinel keeping incinerates tips him toward being too weak. His inability to counter the most common mutants means he will sit on the bench in BGs and most other important content too. Why bring him when other techs are more versatile? What's the point of buffing him if he won't be any more helpful?
    what's better for the game? buffing a champ to be good overall (like he is now) or making him better in non-mutant matchups (giving him plasma/degen whatever) and then destroying the value of the entire mutant class?

    i get the need to have class identity, but maybe not at the cost having an entire set of current and future champs made worthless.
  • Herbal_TaxmanHerbal_Taxman Member Posts: 840 ★★★★

    DinoHop05 said:

    The argument for plasma is pretty meh.

    Having a champion who counters literally every opponent who they've got class advantage against doesn't make the game better - it makes for more limited choices.

    Do we really want all mutants to have zero defensive value, if the opponent has a Sentinel?

    this is probably the best message to takeaway from this thread.

    dll has implied going against the standard class identity when brainstorming champ designs and it makes sense.

    it pains me that sentinel won't work against a lot mutants but do we really need to ruin the defensive value of most of them with one champ? that's bad design. champs like nimrod hurt the game more than help.
    Of course DLL would say that, he thinks turning off masteries is good champ design.

    But regardless, I disagree with your supposed takeaway, because Sentinel keeping incinerates tips him toward being too weak. His inability to counter the most common mutants means he will sit on the bench in BGs and most other important content too. Why bring him when other techs are more versatile? What's the point of buffing him if he won't be any more helpful?
    what's better for the game? buffing a champ to be good overall (like he is now) or making him better in non-mutant matchups (giving him plasma/degen whatever) and then destroying the value of the entire mutant class?

    i get the need to have class identity, but maybe not at the cost having an entire set of current and future champs made worthless.
    I think this is a good point and it highlights the fact that , aside from Dust, all of the problem mutant defenders have very uniform kits. Bishop, Havok, Onslaught all cut from the same cloth.
  • Average_DesiAverage_Desi Member Posts: 756 ★★★
    Sentinel is a value buff like that of Angela and not a full rework. So it makes sense how he works
  • DinoHop05DinoHop05 Member Posts: 22

    Sentinel is a value buff like that of Angela and not a full rework. So it makes sense how he works

    But it's not just a value buff. They gave him a completely new L3. His analysis charges generate new attack and other benefits. He has a brand new signature ability. It would not have been hard to alter his incinerate to a debuff that actually works against the most common mutants champs.
  • Ayden_noah1Ayden_noah1 Member Posts: 1,915 ★★★★
    All they need to do is give Sentenil a pre-fight ability to apply, shock, incinerate or degen. This would solve the problem against all mutants. This might make Sentinel a real Mutant Killer as he was program to be.
  • xLunatiXxxLunatiXx Member Posts: 1,438 ★★★★★
    Maybe he'll get updated in his next buff in 2030. Don't waste your saliva till then
  • WednesdayLengthWednesdayLength Member Posts: 1,616 ★★★★
    DinoHop05 said:

    Sentinel is a value buff like that of Angela and not a full rework. So it makes sense how he works

    But it's not just a value buff. They gave him a completely new L3. His analysis charges generate new attack and other benefits. He has a brand new signature ability. It would not have been hard to alter his incinerate to a debuff that actually works against the most common mutants champs.
    The l3 is almost identical in terms of its concept it's just stronger. This is the definition of a value buff in the modern sense of the term
  • WednesdayLengthWednesdayLength Member Posts: 1,616 ★★★★

    All they need to do is give Sentenil a pre-fight ability to apply, shock, incinerate or degen. This would solve the problem against all mutants. This might make Sentinel a real Mutant Killer as he was program to be.

    It would also make him arguably too strong for the kind of buff he has
  • OurobørosOurobøros Member Posts: 1,789 ★★★★★
    It's weird that since Serpent release, we have got Purgatory buff, Spiral and now Isophyne to counter him, and for Onslaught we got Jack, for Enchantress we got Luke Cage buff, for Bullseye we got Sinister buff and NTW, for Photon we got Patriot (kinda). But for Dust we have not a single reliable counter, no glance counter, no constant incinerate, no sandstorm immune or resistance, Sentinel could've been something close to that
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 9,988 ★★★★★

    It's weird that since Serpent release, we have got Purgatory buff, Spiral and now Isophyne to counter him, and for Onslaught we got Jack, for Enchantress we got Luke Cage buff, for Bullseye we got Sinister buff and NTW, for Photon we got Patriot (kinda). But for Dust we have not a single reliable counter, no glance counter, no constant incinerate, no sandstorm immune or resistance, Sentinel could've been something close to that

    Because dust is not in par with other defenders. Any champ who can inflict lot of incenerates can destroy her, we actually have few meta ones like sunspot and human torch, and she was released along with ironheart who's a great counter. Negasonic is a reliable counter as well.

    Prowler and jack have abilities to counter her as well.
  • Average_DesiAverage_Desi Member Posts: 756 ★★★
    DinoHop05 said:

    Sentinel is a value buff like that of Angela and not a full rework. So it makes sense how he works

    But it's not just a value buff. They gave him a completely new L3. His analysis charges generate new attack and other benefits. He has a brand new signature ability. It would not have been hard to alter his incinerate to a debuff that actually works against the most common mutants champs.
    It is the same sp3. But now instead of two sp3s and 30%(?) missing health, it is 1 sp3 and 100% health.

    Angela was a value buff but she got new abilities as well.
  • PankubankuPankubanku Member Posts: 11
    If plasma is added Sentinel will become crazy overpowered good. Better to not have it.
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 9,988 ★★★★★
    Also I think a missed opportunity on sentinel buff is, his anal charges only increase the armor rating and crit resistance, I wish it increases the energy resistance as well.
  • MagrailothosMagrailothos Member Posts: 6,031 ★★★★★


    In my opinion, Sent should benefit from Jack's treatment:
    - Against Mutants, he should inflict Plasmas instead
    - Give him access to Steady so Glancing counter
    - Ability to block Unblockable attack from Mutants
    - Immunities to Incinerate, Reverse Controls and AAR
    - Access to True Accuracy

    Okay.... Except now: (1) No mutant has any defence against Sentinel (which does not reflect their ability to go toe-to-toe, in canon)
    and
    (2) If you've got Sentinel, you don't need any other Tech champion to defeat any Mutant

    That doesn't sound a little unbalanced, to you?

    I mean seriously...

    Do people not remember the fact it took Kabam something like three years to develop Mystic defenders who didn't defend like tissue paper against Human Torch?
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 8,038 ★★★★★

    If plasma is added Sentinel will become crazy overpowered good. Better to not have it.

    Also he shouldn't be as strong as Nimrod who is the super mutant hunter before Bastion's arrival
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 8,038 ★★★★★

    As a perspective from a huge X-Men fan: Sentinel isn't supposed to be the definitive, Unstoppable killing machine. That's Nimrod.

    Sentinels were dangerous partly because of the totalitarian regime they represented; but because they were great big tireless machines that came in numbers; and didn't rest or sleep; and even if you defeated one, more came behind them



    "" />




    Mutants regularly defeated individual sentinels - they just couldn't defeat the sentinel regime.

    Yes even in the X-Men cartoon they were able to take down individual Sentinels without problems
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 8,038 ★★★★★
    @Fantomaxop what is your opinion on this?
  • BartekTymoczkoBartekTymoczko Member Posts: 309 ★★


    In my opinion, Sent should benefit from Jack's treatment:
    - Against Mutants, he should inflict Plasmas instead
    - Give him access to Steady so Glancing counter
    - Ability to block Unblockable attack from Mutants
    - Immunities to Incinerate, Reverse Controls and AAR
    - Access to True Accuracy

    Okay.... Except now: (1) No mutant has any defence against Sentinel (which does not reflect their ability to go toe-to-toe, in canon)
    and
    (2) If you've got Sentinel, you don't need any other Tech champion to defeat any Mutant

    That doesn't sound a little unbalanced, to you?

    I mean seriously...

    Do people not remember the fact it took Kabam something like three years to develop Mystic defenders who didn't defend like tissue paper against Human Torch?
    Actually...as you put it like that...yeah, that makes sense. Especially, that Sentinel is kind of the lowest in "Sentinel Food Chain", cause I believe Omega-Sentinel, Nimrod and then Bastion are DEFINETELY ABOVE (not sure where OS stands, is it before or after Nimrod), but yeah. After some thinking, I do agree with your statement 🤝
  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 4,748 ★★★★★

    If plasma is added Sentinel will become crazy overpowered good. Better to not have it.

    Finally, after long pathetic decisions by Kabam, Playerbase is now conditioned to accept watered down heroes.

    Well played Kabam ✌️
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 9,988 ★★★★★
    PT_99 said:

    If plasma is added Sentinel will become crazy overpowered good. Better to not have it.

    Finally, after long pathetic decisions by Kabam, Playerbase is now conditioned to accept watered down heroes.

    Well played Kabam ✌️
    You're getting the point or not? If sentinel gets plasma, then the next few mutant defenders will get plasma immunity, and it will create a cycle of interactions lol.
  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 4,748 ★★★★★
    edited December 9
    Calling it now, sentinal will fall flat and lost in forgotten lands, just like Beta ray bill got,

    Kabam's too scared to rework champs and make them perform like juggernaut and hulk.

    And call it conspiracy theory or whatever but the reason Kabam is introducing so many heroes focused on "end game cOntent" is because next Everest content will never some sort of Anti-Aegon thing going on, playerbase will lose its mind and Kabam will have a good laugh and will say,

    "Lol lol, recently we have released heroes like Enchantress, Northstar 🤮 and also have reworked Sentry, try them." 💯
  • EdisonLawEdisonLaw Member Posts: 8,038 ★★★★★
    PT_99 said:

    Calling it now, sentinal will fall flat and lost in forgotten lands, just like Beta ray bill got,

    Kabam's too scared to rework champs and make them perform like juggernaut and hulk.

    And call it conspiracy theory or whatever but the reason Kabam is introducing so many heroes focused on "end game cOntent" is because next Everest content will never some sort of Anti-Aegon thing going on, playerbase will lose its mind and Kabam will have a good laugh and will say,

    "Lol lol, recently we have released heroes like Enchantress, Northstar 🤮 and also have reworked Sentry, try them." 💯

    BRB is still good though, obviously not as good as when he was first released but still good.
Sign In or Register to comment.