I can already sense the BGs brainrot in this video

2

Comments

  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 11,030 ★★★★★

    BGs is the only mode that matters because it's the only mode that requires specific champs.

    The upcoming necro objectives literally give you a t7 basic and awakening gem. Bg store gives what again?
  • tnair2015tnair2015 Member Posts: 183 ★★
    Fryday said:

    To be fair those, it is all about how each player play this game.

    While for I'm not good enough to take BG seriously, so these a champs that I don't bother with.

    But for the like of KT1, Andrew, Bero, Trapy, BG is the only mode that they really concentrate on, so for them "slow" champs is not interesting.

    In KT1 video he didn't say the Sentry was bad, just that he might not be useful in a lot of places. In a way like a Science version of Aegon.

    I love Aegon and so thanksful I got him and ranked him up for Necropolis, but I have use him since even though I always want to find a way or reason to use him.

    I think KT1 have his point. For me I don't have a Sentry higher than a 5* and are hoping that I get a higher rarity soon, and will rank him if he is essential for Necropolis, but that is just me, each to their own. Live and let live 😊

    exactly, people getting all angry he giving his point of view in his video channel
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 6,666 ★★★★★
    tnair2015 said:

    Fryday said:

    To be fair those, it is all about how each player play this game.

    While for I'm not good enough to take BG seriously, so these a champs that I don't bother with.

    But for the like of KT1, Andrew, Bero, Trapy, BG is the only mode that they really concentrate on, so for them "slow" champs is not interesting.

    In KT1 video he didn't say the Sentry was bad, just that he might not be useful in a lot of places. In a way like a Science version of Aegon.

    I love Aegon and so thanksful I got him and ranked him up for Necropolis, but I have use him since even though I always want to find a way or reason to use him.

    I think KT1 have his point. For me I don't have a Sentry higher than a 5* and are hoping that I get a higher rarity soon, and will rank him if he is essential for Necropolis, but that is just me, each to their own. Live and let live 😊

    exactly, people getting all angry he giving his point of view in his video channel
    You would expect educated points of views or criticism, complaining based on a deep dive... Creates a bunch of confusion for some people.
    Check how many post are out there by people asking if they should save mats to r3 champs that they don't even have yet....
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Member Posts: 22,652 ★★★★★
    Fryday said:

    To be fair those, it is all about how each player play this game.

    While for I'm not good enough to take BG seriously, so these a champs that I don't bother with.

    But for the like of KT1, Andrew, Bero, Trapy, BG is the only mode that they really concentrate on, so for them "slow" champs is not interesting.

    In KT1 video he didn't say the Sentry was bad, just that he might not be useful in a lot of places. In a way like a Science version of Aegon.

    I love Aegon and so thanksful I got him and ranked him up for Necropolis, but I have use him since even though I always want to find a way or reason to use him.

    I think KT1 have his point. For me I don't have a Sentry higher than a 5* and are hoping that I get a higher rarity soon, and will rank him if he is essential for Necropolis, but that is just me, each to their own. Live and let live 😊

    I think the problem most of us have is the clickbait thumbnail. He's got an avatar of him with steam coming his ears and he's red like he's angry.

    The title of the video is "DOA"... Dead on arrival. So which is it? It's a good buff and had his uses or the buff is dead and he's angry at Kabam?
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,708 ★★★★★
    I think it’s a valid general critique that Everest champion design without other redeemable attributes is too narrow of a design lane for most champions and that there is a thing as having too many of these champions in the game.

    Sentry was already in this lane though so I’m not surprised his buff focused on improving this. But you don’t have to look much further than Void to see the accuracy in some of the points KT raises as Void is usable in Everest content but has mechanics that are applicable in many other places. I think his example of Serpent being a strong defender with a ramp up mechanic is a great call out too. I actually really like this concept for Everest champs. It gives them a purpose outside of narrow content.

    Sentry will have a couple more narrow uses and I’ll reserve my full judgement on Sentry until after the update and I get to fool around a bit with his new kit. And who knows, with the healthpools in 9.2 maybe Kabam will break a bit more outside if the 6 fights per a quest box they’ve restricted themselves too giving Sentry and Aegon more purpose on the game.

    But I would rather have someone point out this design flaw rather than quietly just applaud it when they disagree.
  • BigBlueOxBigBlueOx Member Posts: 2,708 ★★★★★

    Fryday said:

    To be fair those, it is all about how each player play this game.

    While for I'm not good enough to take BG seriously, so these a champs that I don't bother with.

    But for the like of KT1, Andrew, Bero, Trapy, BG is the only mode that they really concentrate on, so for them "slow" champs is not interesting.

    In KT1 video he didn't say the Sentry was bad, just that he might not be useful in a lot of places. In a way like a Science version of Aegon.

    I love Aegon and so thanksful I got him and ranked him up for Necropolis, but I have use him since even though I always want to find a way or reason to use him.

    I think KT1 have his point. For me I don't have a Sentry higher than a 5* and are hoping that I get a higher rarity soon, and will rank him if he is essential for Necropolis, but that is just me, each to their own. Live and let live 😊

    I think the problem most of us have is the clickbait thumbnail. He's got an avatar of him with steam coming his ears and he's red like he's angry.

    The title of the video is "DOA"... Dead on arrival. So which is it? It's a good buff and had his uses or the buff is dead and he's angry at Kabam?
    This is a very fair criticism. I get frustrated with this approach on positive and negatives from creators.

    It’s like showing off an attacker in their best possible matchups and promoting it as if the design is flawless and “new god” in the thumbnail.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 6,666 ★★★★★
    BigBlueOx said:

    I think it’s a valid general critique that Everest champion design without other redeemable attributes is too narrow of a design lane for most champions and that there is a thing as having too many of these champions in the game.

    Sentry was already in this lane though so I’m not surprised his buff focused on improving this. But you don’t have to look much further than Void to see the accuracy in some of the points KT raises as Void is usable in Everest content but has mechanics that are applicable in many other places. I think his example of Serpent being a strong defender with a ramp up mechanic is a great call out too. I actually really like this concept for Everest champs. It gives them a purpose outside of narrow content.

    Sentry will have a couple more narrow uses and I’ll reserve my full judgement on Sentry until after the update and I get to fool around a bit with his new kit. And who knows, with the healthpools in 9.2 maybe Kabam will break a bit more outside if the 6 fights per a quest box they’ve restricted themselves too giving Sentry and Aegon more purpose on the game.

    But I would rather have someone point out this design flaw rather than quietly just applaud it when they disagree.

    Which is what every player should learn to do, and I think that's what Emilia meant by "Fanboys", you got people repeating everything as if it was an ultimate fact. People are going nuts about champs they haven't even played after rework or champs they don't even have.
  • Herbal_TaxmanHerbal_Taxman Member Posts: 1,075 ★★★★

    BigBlueOx said:

    I think it’s a valid general critique that Everest champion design without other redeemable attributes is too narrow of a design lane for most champions and that there is a thing as having too many of these champions in the game.

    Sentry was already in this lane though so I’m not surprised his buff focused on improving this. But you don’t have to look much further than Void to see the accuracy in some of the points KT raises as Void is usable in Everest content but has mechanics that are applicable in many other places. I think his example of Serpent being a strong defender with a ramp up mechanic is a great call out too. I actually really like this concept for Everest champs. It gives them a purpose outside of narrow content.

    Sentry will have a couple more narrow uses and I’ll reserve my full judgement on Sentry until after the update and I get to fool around a bit with his new kit. And who knows, with the healthpools in 9.2 maybe Kabam will break a bit more outside if the 6 fights per a quest box they’ve restricted themselves too giving Sentry and Aegon more purpose on the game.

    But I would rather have someone point out this design flaw rather than quietly just applaud it when they disagree.

    Which is what every player should learn to do, and I think that's what Emilia meant by "Fanboys", you got people repeating everything as if it was an ultimate fact. People are going nuts about champs they haven't even played after rework or champs they don't even have.

    It’s a fair concern, but one that has much more to do with the CCP hype train than independent YT guys.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 6,666 ★★★★★

    BigBlueOx said:

    I think it’s a valid general critique that Everest champion design without other redeemable attributes is too narrow of a design lane for most champions and that there is a thing as having too many of these champions in the game.

    Sentry was already in this lane though so I’m not surprised his buff focused on improving this. But you don’t have to look much further than Void to see the accuracy in some of the points KT raises as Void is usable in Everest content but has mechanics that are applicable in many other places. I think his example of Serpent being a strong defender with a ramp up mechanic is a great call out too. I actually really like this concept for Everest champs. It gives them a purpose outside of narrow content.

    Sentry will have a couple more narrow uses and I’ll reserve my full judgement on Sentry until after the update and I get to fool around a bit with his new kit. And who knows, with the healthpools in 9.2 maybe Kabam will break a bit more outside if the 6 fights per a quest box they’ve restricted themselves too giving Sentry and Aegon more purpose on the game.

    But I would rather have someone point out this design flaw rather than quietly just applaud it when they disagree.

    Which is what every player should learn to do, and I think that's what Emilia meant by "Fanboys", you got people repeating everything as if it was an ultimate fact. People are going nuts about champs they haven't even played after rework or champs they don't even have.

    It’s a fair concern, but one that has much more to do with the CCP hype train than independent YT guys.
    Look its quite easy, this is a Sentry rework, a champ that a lot of people already have. Test it and evaluate if its your cup of tea... If its not there are 200+ other champs out there..
    So what if 1 champ rework is made for long content? What is so wrong with that?
  • Herbal_TaxmanHerbal_Taxman Member Posts: 1,075 ★★★★

    BigBlueOx said:

    I think it’s a valid general critique that Everest champion design without other redeemable attributes is too narrow of a design lane for most champions and that there is a thing as having too many of these champions in the game.

    Sentry was already in this lane though so I’m not surprised his buff focused on improving this. But you don’t have to look much further than Void to see the accuracy in some of the points KT raises as Void is usable in Everest content but has mechanics that are applicable in many other places. I think his example of Serpent being a strong defender with a ramp up mechanic is a great call out too. I actually really like this concept for Everest champs. It gives them a purpose outside of narrow content.

    Sentry will have a couple more narrow uses and I’ll reserve my full judgement on Sentry until after the update and I get to fool around a bit with his new kit. And who knows, with the healthpools in 9.2 maybe Kabam will break a bit more outside if the 6 fights per a quest box they’ve restricted themselves too giving Sentry and Aegon more purpose on the game.

    But I would rather have someone point out this design flaw rather than quietly just applaud it when they disagree.

    Which is what every player should learn to do, and I think that's what Emilia meant by "Fanboys", you got people repeating everything as if it was an ultimate fact. People are going nuts about champs they haven't even played after rework or champs they don't even have.

    It’s a fair concern, but one that has much more to do with the CCP hype train than independent YT guys.
    Look its quite easy, this is a Sentry rework, a champ that a lot of people already have. Test it and evaluate if its your cup of tea... If its not there are 200+ other champs out there..
    So what if 1 champ rework is made for long content? What is so wrong with that?

    Nothing at all, IMO. I just don’t think anyone should be surprised if there’s little excitement for it. Totally agree that it’s best to wait and try him out.
  • altavistaaltavista Member Posts: 1,577 ★★★★
    edited December 2024
    EdisonLaw said:

    What these people need to understand is BGs is not the only game mode, there are other very enjoyable modes as well. Sentry will be good in most areas, even potentially war as he is tactic. He'll also be useful in Act 9.2 and onwards due to large healthpools.

    I don't care about Sentry's BG tier, but my one misgiving about him in questing content is how he can lose Reality Warp charges. I shudder at ramping him up to 10, then dying to Nameless Grandmaster 10 times in a row without being able to gain a single Warp.

    G2099 is a close approximation of this feeling, but at least she only needs one fight previously to end with an SP3, as opposed to needing to win fights and convert solar energy to ramp up. Arcade as well has the problem where if you lose the fight you kind of lose more than just that single fight.
  • BringPopcornBringPopcorn Member Posts: 6,666 ★★★★★

    BigBlueOx said:

    I think it’s a valid general critique that Everest champion design without other redeemable attributes is too narrow of a design lane for most champions and that there is a thing as having too many of these champions in the game.

    Sentry was already in this lane though so I’m not surprised his buff focused on improving this. But you don’t have to look much further than Void to see the accuracy in some of the points KT raises as Void is usable in Everest content but has mechanics that are applicable in many other places. I think his example of Serpent being a strong defender with a ramp up mechanic is a great call out too. I actually really like this concept for Everest champs. It gives them a purpose outside of narrow content.

    Sentry will have a couple more narrow uses and I’ll reserve my full judgement on Sentry until after the update and I get to fool around a bit with his new kit. And who knows, with the healthpools in 9.2 maybe Kabam will break a bit more outside if the 6 fights per a quest box they’ve restricted themselves too giving Sentry and Aegon more purpose on the game.

    But I would rather have someone point out this design flaw rather than quietly just applaud it when they disagree.

    Which is what every player should learn to do, and I think that's what Emilia meant by "Fanboys", you got people repeating everything as if it was an ultimate fact. People are going nuts about champs they haven't even played after rework or champs they don't even have.

    It’s a fair concern, but one that has much more to do with the CCP hype train than independent YT guys.
    Look its quite easy, this is a Sentry rework, a champ that a lot of people already have. Test it and evaluate if its your cup of tea... If its not there are 200+ other champs out there..
    So what if 1 champ rework is made for long content? What is so wrong with that?

    Nothing at all, IMO. I just don’t think anyone should be surprised if there’s little excitement for it. Totally agree that it’s best to wait and try him out.
    You know what's the worst part? As soon as the rework is live, people are going straight to WS punching bag in LoL, and make a conclusion based on that...
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 5,848 ★★★★★

    Sure but why bring this over here? This seems like the kind of thing you would debate within the comment section of that video…

    To show what a good anti-KT1 person they are for points.
    Anti-kt1 person is like me, one who actually unsubbed long ago and who actually doesn't care about the opinions on the channel.
    Stopped watching without being negetive and toxic. We all have reasons to not follow someone, I have mine.
    It's his channel, he have opinions, who doesn't? So what? Talk to him directly in his stream or the comment section.

    Let's assume I say that, I do not care about a single mode outside BGs. I play only for BGs and nothing else.
    Tell me who is wrong? Me only caring about bgs, or you enjoying other modes? Who decides who is correct?

    There were zero reasons to link the video
    Should have made a post with your opinions instead.
  • Asher1_1Asher1_1 Member Posts: 845 ★★★
    EdisonLaw said:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8c2P_Lr0Nk

    What these people need to understand is BGs is not the only game mode, there are other very enjoyable modes as well. Sentry will be good in most areas, even potentially war as he is tactic. He'll also be useful in Act 9.2 and onwards due to large healthpools.

    Why are u concerned lol
    It's his channel , he plays & streams mostly BGs - so he post his opinion on his channel.

    & Story mode most people just boost up cruise through - sentry not needed in 9.2 beta
  • HungaryHippoHungaryHippo Member Posts: 1,087 ★★★★

    Sure but why bring this over here? This seems like the kind of thing you would debate within the comment section of that video…

    To show what a good anti-KT1 person they are for points.
    Anti-kt1 person is like me, one who actually unsubbed long ago and who actually doesn't care about the opinions on the channel.
    Stopped watching without being negetive and toxic. We all have reasons to not follow someone, I have mine.
    It's his channel, he have opinions, who doesn't? So what? Talk to him directly in his stream or the comment section.

    Let's assume I say that, I do not care about a single mode outside BGs. I play only for BGs and nothing else.
    Tell me who is wrong? Me only caring about bgs, or you enjoying other modes? Who decides who is correct?

    There were zero reasons to link the video
    Should have made a post with your opinions instead.
    Which is fair. My response was about the OP who feels the need to show how much KT lives rent free in their head.
  • Ironman3000Ironman3000 Member Posts: 2,015 ★★★★★

    BGs is the only mode that matters because it's the only mode that requires specific champs.

    What are you talking about lmao
    If you have a deck full of meta BG champs then you have a roster that can take any other content or game mode. It's not that hard to understand.
  • captain_rogerscaptain_rogers Member Posts: 11,030 ★★★★★

    BGs is the only mode that matters because it's the only mode that requires specific champs.

    What are you talking about lmao
    If you have a deck full of meta BG champs then you have a roster that can take any other content or game mode. It's not that hard to understand.
    Meta changes every month literally the best bg champ cgr is useless previous gc and this season VT makes hulkling useless another staple attacker.
  • Ironman3000Ironman3000 Member Posts: 2,015 ★★★★★

    BGs is the only mode that matters because it's the only mode that requires specific champs.

    The upcoming necro objectives literally give you a t7 basic and awakening gem. Bg store gives what again?
    I'm guessing that zero BG camps will be in the objectives, lol. And, most aren't gonna r3 one-off champs for a challenge.
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 5,848 ★★★★★

    Sure but why bring this over here? This seems like the kind of thing you would debate within the comment section of that video…

    To show what a good anti-KT1 person they are for points.
    Anti-kt1 person is like me, one who actually unsubbed long ago and who actually doesn't care about the opinions on the channel.
    Stopped watching without being negetive and toxic. We all have reasons to not follow someone, I have mine.
    It's his channel, he have opinions, who doesn't? So what? Talk to him directly in his stream or the comment section.

    Let's assume I say that, I do not care about a single mode outside BGs. I play only for BGs and nothing else.
    Tell me who is wrong? Me only caring about bgs, or you enjoying other modes? Who decides who is correct?

    There were zero reasons to link the video
    Should have made a post with your opinions instead.
    Which is fair. My response was about the OP who feels the need to show how much KT lives rent free in their head.
    Dam, sorry I forgot halfway that I was replying to a quoted comment.
    The later half is in response to the post itself
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 5,848 ★★★★★
    PT_99 said:

    Name one "EnJOyAblE" game mode which you can play daily with equally nice store rewards.

    A Q. Bestest mode. 100%
  • Ironman3000Ironman3000 Member Posts: 2,015 ★★★★★

    BGs is the only mode that matters because it's the only mode that requires specific champs.

    What are you talking about lmao
    If you have a deck full of meta BG champs then you have a roster that can take any other content or game mode. It's not that hard to understand.
    Meta changes every month literally the best bg champ cgr is useless previous gc and this season VT makes hulkling useless another staple attacker.
    I honestly have no idea what point you're even trying to make here.
  • FrydayFryday Member Posts: 1,334 ★★★★
    Now that Sentry is out, seem like more players have a better idea of how his buff is.

    I now have watched many other CCPs YT on this and they all follow the same thought, which is Sentry is still busy ramping up in Incursion. 🤣🤣🤣. The game mode that currently have a massive bug that only a handful of players bothers fighting for a fix (myself included).

    I noted that the MCOC community can be quite biased, if Lagacy or Vega criticise something they are hero, but when someone else that isn't in the CCP exclusive club then they are brainrot and whining baby.

    Think it is best to discussion people's idea for the people themselves.

    Personally I think what is discussed KT1 video on the Banquet 2024, is it clearer and than what is discussed in Lagacy, there are more there that Kabam can work from. The TDLR is try to understand your players progression need better.

    Hope everyone have a good Christmas, fellow MCOC players and CCP 😊
  • PT_99PT_99 Member Posts: 5,259 ★★★★★
    Revisiting this again,
    What happened guys?
    Is Sentry good in Necro? 🤣

    +1 charges when sentry win fight
    -1 charges when sentry loses a fight,

    Good luck with this nonsense in Necropolis,

    Kebem buffing a hero only for incursions is biggest nonsense thing they have done when it comes to buffs,
    Literally whole community wanted Sentry to be good but now he's nothing but a potato to use in incursions.

    But oh wait, there's already incursions god who just can't die?
    Plus a spideygirl who just stun lock you to death,
    Plus a guy who just throws his cards and places bleed and power stings on you,
    Plus Vampire mutant guy who just hold his heavy till he wins,
    Plus warrior goddes girl with Odin as her cheerleader,

    Tell me where does sentry fits in incursions.
  • OldManHopOldManHop Member Posts: 495 ★★★
    PT_99 said:

    Revisiting this again,
    What happened guys?
    Is Sentry good in Necro? 🤣

    +1 charges when sentry win fight
    -1 charges when sentry loses a fight,

    Good luck with this nonsense in Necropolis,

    Kebem buffing a hero only for incursions is biggest nonsense thing they have done when it comes to buffs,
    Literally whole community wanted Sentry to be good but now he's nothing but a potato to use in incursions.

    But oh wait, there's already incursions god who just can't die?
    Plus a spideygirl who just stun lock you to death,
    Plus a guy who just throws his cards and places bleed and power stings on you,
    Plus Vampire mutant guy who just hold his heavy till he wins,
    Plus warrior goddes girl with Odin as her cheerleader,

    Tell me where does sentry fits in incursions.

    All the hostility seems unnecessary.
  • Shamir51Shamir51 Member Posts: 1,134 ★★★★
    OldManHop said:

    PT_99 said:

    Revisiting this again,
    What happened guys?
    Is Sentry good in Necro? 🤣

    +1 charges when sentry win fight
    -1 charges when sentry loses a fight,

    Good luck with this nonsense in Necropolis,

    Kebem buffing a hero only for incursions is biggest nonsense thing they have done when it comes to buffs,
    Literally whole community wanted Sentry to be good but now he's nothing but a potato to use in incursions.

    But oh wait, there's already incursions god who just can't die?
    Plus a spideygirl who just stun lock you to death,
    Plus a guy who just throws his cards and places bleed and power stings on you,
    Plus Vampire mutant guy who just hold his heavy till he wins,
    Plus warrior goddes girl with Odin as her cheerleader,

    Tell me where does sentry fits in incursions.

    All the hostility seems unnecessary.
    Unnecessary until you realise who it is 🤷‍♂️
  • SkunkcabbageSkunkcabbage Member Posts: 385 ★★★
    I was watching MSD stream and he said Sentry isn't a great option for Necro. I haven't heard of anyone successfully using Sentry in their run, or anyone adopting him. I'm happy to be corrected, but it seems like the buff wasn't enough for him.
  • WednesdayLengthWednesdayLength Member Posts: 2,064 ★★★★
    PT_99 said:

    Revisiting this again,
    What happened guys?
    Is Sentry good in Necro? 🤣

    +1 charges when sentry win fight
    -1 charges when sentry loses a fight,

    Good luck with this nonsense in Necropolis,

    Kebem buffing a hero only for incursions is biggest nonsense thing they have done when it comes to buffs,
    Literally whole community wanted Sentry to be good but now he's nothing but a potato to use in incursions.

    But oh wait, there's already incursions god who just can't die?
    Plus a spideygirl who just stun lock you to death,
    Plus a guy who just throws his cards and places bleed and power stings on you,
    Plus Vampire mutant guy who just hold his heavy till he wins,
    Plus warrior goddes girl with Odin as her cheerleader,

    Tell me where does sentry fits in incursions.

    You know you can get more than 1 charge per fight right?
Sign In or Register to comment.