Battlegrounds suggestion

Since radiance is the hot new currency introduced to boost battleground...I have some suggestions...pls look up to this
I tried to complete 2objective of radiance in battlegrounds and fall from 157 to below 70..that means fall from gamma3 tier to uru 2...so I was not able to achieve 2nd milestone...

If the "radiance currency milestone"depend on number of matches each player played instead of bg score then it will be more fun...and it will force players to play more bg matches ...
In my alliance 2 or 3 players score above 200 and they stopped playing bg...where as we play each day but still not able to achieve both milestone...

I know radiance currency is highest value currency which is not obtain easily...but need of resources to levelup champion is also becoming higher...
Previous month I obtained cyclops phoenix tigra and ibom...in order to levelup each champ we also need proper resources source ..
So I request kabam pls set milestone for radiance in such a way that every die hard players have also access to it

Comments

Gamer

Since radiance is the hot new currency introduced to boost battleground...I have some suggestions...pls look up to this
I tried to complete 2objective of radiance in battlegrounds and fall from 157 to below 70..that means fall from gamma3 tier to uru 2...so I was not able to achieve 2nd milestone...

If the "radiance currency milestone"depend on number of matches each player played instead of bg score then it will be more fun...and it will force players to play more bg matches ...
In my alliance 2 or 3 players score above 200 and they stopped playing bg...where as we play each day but still not able to achieve both milestone...

I know radiance currency is highest value currency which is not obtain easily...but need of resources to levelup champion is also becoming higher...
Previous month I obtained cyclops phoenix tigra and ibom...in order to levelup each champ we also need proper resources source ..
So I request kabam pls set milestone for radiance in such a way that every die hard players have also access to it

That’s what wrong just because you gained something new doesn’t mean you need to rank them up asap that’s not efficient

PT_99

You obtained Tigra, cyclops, phoneix, ibom.

But that doesn't mean you will be able to rank them all up at once right away without paying the price.

That price can be outright units/money deals or time spent in BG grind or paying the price of time by ranking them up in order of need instead of want.

Hipoceros

Why people is talking about his champs instead of the idea he bring to us....
I'm ok with the number of bg played instead of score....
Even if that number is higher than the actual needed to achieve the actual score.

TotemCorruption

Great idea OP.
Maybe the Celestial I title can also go to the player who has played the most matches, regardless of win/loss record.
/s

Gamer

Why people is talking about his champs instead of the idea he bring to us....
I'm ok with the number of bg played instead of score....
Even if that number is higher than the actual needed to achieve the actual score.

Because that’s wouldn’t make sense for an end game currency.

_Pez_

One thing that could encourage more participation in battlegrounds, without impacting the top end rewards, and preventing people from losing motivation at long loss streaks would be, to say up to a score of 200-300 put a floor on how much you can fall to maybe half the max score you have achieved to date that season. So if you have got to 100, you can't fall below 50, if you have got to 200, you can't fall below 100, etc. Wouldn't impact the top ranks, and means people can't lose all their progress, but enough of it.

Me personally, I've just given up on 250 points until the last day of the season because don't see the point completely risking what am at now.

PT_99

Why people is talking about his champs instead of the idea he bring to us....
I'm ok with the number of bg played instead of score....
Even if that number is higher than the actual needed to achieve the actual score.

Because competition is about who wins the most,
Not who played the most.

DNA3000

If the "radiance currency milestone"depend on number of matches each player played instead of bg score then it will be more fun...and it will force players to play more bg matches

It won't be more fun. It might be more fun for you, but I suspect it will not be more fun for the top BG players to find out that I scored more Radiance than they did because I was willing to play more BG matches than them even though I lost them all. For the players who are actually spending the time to get good at BG, I think they will find that to be no fun at all.

Also, this will not force players to play more BG matches. It will force them to *start* more BG matches. If I could get top tier Radiance simply by playing enough matches, I'm not actually going to be playing them. I'm just going to be starting them. Why would I actually play them?

Bayouem

This idea has participation trophy vibes written all over it. Winning matches to get to 200 points is difficult as it should be.

DNA3000

One thing that could encourage more participation in battlegrounds, without impacting the top end rewards, and preventing people from losing motivation at long loss streaks would be, to say up to a score of 200-300 put a floor on how much you can fall to maybe half the max score you have achieved to date that season. So if you have got to 100, you can't fall below 50, if you have got to 200, you can't fall below 100, etc. Wouldn't impact the top ranks, and means people can't lose all their progress, but enough of it.

Me personally, I've just given up on 250 points until the last day of the season because don't see the point completely risking what am at now.

That's probably working as intended. I don't think Kabam is particularly worried about encouraging GC players to play more. If you think you can win, you're supposed to play more and advance. But if you think you can't win, you aren't supposed to have a way to grind your way higher than your ability to win can otherwise take you. If you've peaked, you've peaked. I don't think we should be looking for ways to bribe the players already at the top (if you're in GC, you're at the top of the mode already) when the goal should be to encourage broader overall participation without compromising the game mode itself.

BringPopcorn

Kabam could say your idea is great and put the milestone at 5k matches played.. yay

_Pez_

One thing that could encourage more participation in battlegrounds, without impacting the top end rewards, and preventing people from losing motivation at long loss streaks would be, to say up to a score of 200-300 put a floor on how much you can fall to maybe half the max score you have achieved to date that season. So if you have got to 100, you can't fall below 50, if you have got to 200, you can't fall below 100, etc. Wouldn't impact the top ranks, and means people can't lose all their progress, but enough of it.

Me personally, I've just given up on 250 points until the last day of the season because don't see the point completely risking what am at now.
That's probably working as intended. I don't think Kabam is particularly worried about encouraging GC players to play more. If you think you can win, you're supposed to play more and advance. But if you think you can't win, you aren't supposed to have a way to grind your way higher than your ability to win can otherwise take you. If you've peaked, you've peaked. I don't think we should be looking for ways to bribe the players already at the top (if you're in GC, you're at the top of the mode already) when the goal should be to encourage broader overall participation without compromising the game mode itself.

I don't think a floor would compromise the game mode, if you got to 400 points and dropped down to 200 because of a bad streak, you still have to make back a net of 13 or so wins to get back up another 200 points to get back to where you were before. It just would stop you lose ALL your progress. I think GC is quite unusual in that it lets you lose everything potentially. Yes, you shouldn't have a guaranteed path upwards, that would defeat the point but a safety net that moves up as you keep winning, I think could have a lot of benefits. You have to keep winning and have to win back every time you lose something still.

GrabmeMCOC

Everything you’re after is in the Arena and bought with units.

Good luck Summoner.

ariebrkl

I agrea about the need to buff rank rewards for the amount of games you played
Rank rewards are trash