**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
Either the game allows my alliance to sign up to compete for the biggest award with the strongest or it gives the same award in all categories.
It's like in the UFC or any other competition that there are different levels of competitors for various issues.
In this way the stronger will get stronger and stronger and who started recently will take much longer to stay strong.
Rewards should be equal in all categories, correct this fault as it is time before more people abandon the game because they understand that it will become increasingly difficult to compete for the top.
they already removed prestige from matchmaking last week ... matchmaking back to being nice and fast
Is this graphic correct? On the rewards Image there was masters rank1-3 and another master level below that
rewards... should be equal... in all categories...? whats the point of competing then?!
You obviously haven't read the scoring system even losing wars gains you points so stopping wars has no benefit
First, in relation to the question by @TheOneAndOnly , my reading is that the rank is based on overall points. So if one alliance goes 7-0 in 7 wars and another ally in same tier goes 7-7 in same tier, the 7-7 ally should theoretically be ahead. That 7-7 ally would get points from those 7 losses that the other ally didn’t get. Am I missing something here?
Second, is my understanding of points correct? So in another hypothetical, an ally that goes 7-0 in all three bg wars will score more points than an ally that goes 7-0 in all two bg wars?
Kinda feels like you scored an own goal with this one Kabam.
I was sick
yes and yes
It says in the announcement feb 7 to April 4
You're correct on both counts. In your first hypothetical, the Alliance that Goes 7-0 will get the points for the 7 wars, plus 50,000 points for each win, while the second Alliance will get the points for 14 wars, and their 7 wins.
Same with the second hypothetical. Your alliance will earn more points for running more Battlegroups, so you're more likely to get more points than an Alliance only running 1 or 2 Battlegroups.
If so are you aware of your current standing in bracket?
Oh, I have read it and realize there is an inherent risk. But hypothetically if I have a live leaderboard and 4 weeks of 100% cleared battlemaps then I will know going into week 6, week 7 and week 8 how good a shot we have at top 3, top 20 or top 300. You forget how we like crunching numbers in higher alliances. Data is extremely valuable.
Your Bracket is completely Fluid. You could be in Silver 1, then finish a War that propels you into Gold 3. Then your next war could push you further up, or drop you back down. The Leaderboard will help you determine where you are.
Doesnt answer the question bout rewards
We're still currently investigating exactly what is happening with Synergies in Alliance Wars. We'll let you all know as soon as we have more information to share on that topic.
All sounds good and fun.
But with this update does it also contain a fix for matchmaking? As last 10 wars we got 8 times 1.5+ million stronger opponents
Yes, There are special Rewards for those Alliances that place in 1st, 2nd and 3rd overall in the Season.
The new seasons mode looks great, rewards are juiced up and Kabam are delivering the resources we’ve been asking for. That’s the good part. Now the bad...
Kabam need to ensure that this mode is fair. And they need to monitor it. Piloting in war is as common as ever. Matchmaking as rigged as ever with alliances purposefully avoiding each other. These problems mean that the distribution of the most prestigious rewards in game will not be fairly distributed. This is exploiting the game and should be punishable.
Piloting?
Account sharing