**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
MVP players in aw should be rewarded
iwantanswers
Posts: 36
What's hood?
Just chilling like a villain
So I've gotten like 30 MVP since its introduction. I feel like an extra compensation should go to those who get it. Now, I know you can get it from various path so don't tell me u can only get it from a particular path cause that's falls, I've proven this in my alliance.
I think it's only fair to give an extra reward to that player, what purpose serves me to be an MVP if there is no price behind it? It's meaningless.
Please, give us, your MVP players some good stuff.
Thanx
Just chilling like a villain
So I've gotten like 30 MVP since its introduction. I feel like an extra compensation should go to those who get it. Now, I know you can get it from various path so don't tell me u can only get it from a particular path cause that's falls, I've proven this in my alliance.
I think it's only fair to give an extra reward to that player, what purpose serves me to be an MVP if there is no price behind it? It's meaningless.
Please, give us, your MVP players some good stuff.
Thanx
7
Comments
Wrong. If your prestige is not what the Lliance is looking for then it doesn't matter how many mvp you get. You could be the best player but if your prestige is low then you ain't getting in.
I"ve been the MVP in the alliance quite a few times. I don't want rewards for it. I don't want to be competing with my own alliance members for zero-sum rewards in a game mode that otherwise is entirely based on cooperation.
I do what I need to do to maximize my alliance's chance of winning. If that means getting more points than anyone else, great. If it means letting other players rack up points on easier nodes and then tackling the harder ones, fine with me. I don't even know how many times I've been MVP because I don't keep track, because that's not something I even want to keep track of.
I place 5/50 and 4/55 in war and if i started to get mvp due to a specific node dont you think other players wanna place there too? There isnt any 1st come 1st service going on here. You get lucky most of the time for example power shield kicks ass and once gave me 29 down due to my specific champ for it. I got mvp in that much cause i had taken down the boss that day with 6 fights done by me but that doesnt make me owner of that node for defense who got the kills.
Which would also place a huge burden on battlegroup officers. I do the placing for my battlegroup, which means which defenders I place on which nodes can affect who the MVP is. As long as it is a paper trophy, nobody cares really. But if there were actual rewards associated with MVP, that would put me in a bad situation, on top of being in a conflict of interest position.
No need to try implement bonus rewards in every single part of the game, next you will want rewards for logging out of the game, placing defenders, and kicking someone out of the alliance.
What is worse is that it is so easy to take advantage of just let someone who wants the rewards get the most percentage or whatever. It is a team effort simple as that.
with the current system id feel bad if i got a reward when 9 (assuming 1 mvp/bg) teammates working as hard on a shorter lane get nothing.
Boss kills and miniboss kills ARE calculated in mvp.
Yes defender kills ARE calculated as well so placing on mini/boss nodes do give you the advantage and defender rating as well... Giving one the mythical "unfair advantage". The ignorant people fail to acknowledge that if you defender rating is high and you are on the boss/mini node, you obviously have the best defenders and should be awarded for such.
Go figure building your defense in a war gets rewarded??? (Sarcasm)
Running the longer/solo paths do also give you an advantage. This also might be fair but I dispute this with the fact that I run short paths all the time and still have gotten mvp.
Now do I agree that rewards should be given for mvp? Absolutely not, you are helping friends, if you need acknowledgement then that is kinda sad.
BUT please trolls stop crying because overall (both offensively and defensively) you are not contributing as much as others when it comes to war. Dismissing the concept of mvp without any real evidence that it is miscalculated just shows how badly you need the validation.
What I will say is that 1. no system is perfect and yes there are minor unfair advantages but please do not pretend like people getting mvps have no idea/reason why they are getting them. 2. You should not get rewarded from doing what you should be doing, which is absolutely maximizing your efficiency/participation for your alliance. So pat yourself on the back if you need it?
Lmao this is hilarious, wondering why he gets 1st over his 3rd place alliance mate....
Then posts a picture where he has 8k rating more in defense?
DO YOU read what you post?
DO YOU read what I post, specifically where I talk about it being a wholesome calculation INCLUDING defense and that it is NOT a perfect system.
Should certain aspects be weighed more??? Well that is completely subjective (as in you believe defender rating should weigh less than boss kills or w.e; I do not feel that way?)
Let me explain what your post of 8k+ defender rating means (clearly you do not understand your own post):
5 defenders, 8k+ rating more => roughly 1.6k rating per champ higher => your defenders are each 1 rank higher => you spent many more resources into your defense = you put much more effort into your defense and I am not sure about you but defense is as important as offense as a wholesome war approach in my oppinion. Based on that logic only offense should matter and someone might as well put 1*s and 2*s on defense and worry only about attack.
"Oh but look he has more defender kills!!!" - One might say, and I say to that well maybe you get stuck with your defenders on worse nodes,..
"Well his defenders are better defenders, thats why we prioritize his champs on better nodes!!!" - One might say, and again I say so the fact that you spent all those resources having higher ranked champs should mean something (at the least, even if your champs include bad defenders, it might be for diversity purposes).
TLDR; (cause you aren't reading my post, let alone your own as it seems) MVP CALCULATION IS A WHOLESOME APPROACH AND THE FACT YOU HAVE ALMOST 8K MORE DEFENDER RATING SOLIDIFIES MY ARGUMENT, THAT "EVERYTHING IS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION" AS IT SHOULD BE.
Now the argument that certain aspects should matter more heavily than othere is competely subjective.
But again stop acting like its a "GRAND MYSTERY" why those who get MVP do.
Reinstated for the 10th time
***"the system is not absolutely perfect, but does consider everything and noone should get rewarded for wanting to help out their alliance as much as possible"***
1. Still no evidence of a person beating someone in EVERY category and not getting mvp over them.
2. Still not reading my post (not even the summarized TLDR section) where I clearly stated about 5 times now between the posts that NO YOU SHOULD NOT GET REWARDS for getting mvp
How can anyone have a discussion with that.