**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

How to solve The game:

CapWW2CapWW2 Posts: 2,901 ★★★★
edited May 2018 in General Discussion
Kabam how we can reduce alliances from 30 to only 15 members and make bgs in AW 5 members each and AQ 5 members each.

30 people is too hard to manage. It is like having a fulltime job.

My alliance is not playing AQ anymore competitively and AW has gone to 1 BG only.

The frustration and burn out is real.

We all love the game but seriously real life is a priority.

Comments

  • CapWW2CapWW2 Posts: 2,901 ★★★★
    edited May 2018
    Rogue42 wrote: »
    When are you going to realize that Kabam doesn’t care about your “real” life. The have weekly, monthly, and quarterly goals they have to make or people lose their jobs.

    No one is losing no job. Google how much kabam has make in the game.

    The fact is that if people are not happy they will keep quiting the game.

    I love the game but again the burn out is real.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Posts: 18,552 Guardian
    Rogue42 wrote: »
    When are you going to realize that Kabam doesn’t care about your “real” life.

    Why should they care if you don't care? If you do care, you won't damage your real life pursuing the goals in a mobile game.
  • CapWW2CapWW2 Posts: 2,901 ★★★★
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    Rogue42 wrote: »
    When are you going to realize that Kabam doesn’t care about your “real” life.

    Why should they care if you don't care? If you do care, you won't damage your real life pursuing the goals in a mobile game.


    I agree with your statement but we all love mcoc. However it is unrealistic to be expected to be connected 24/7 . To invest an insane amount of time with so many events and log in times. To manage 30 adults. It is just too much.

    For the health of the game this is necessary. Just look all the retirement accounts and non active accounts.

    Just look how many alliances not playing events at all or going relax.
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Posts: 20,862 ★★★★★
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    Kabam how we can reduce alliances from 30 to only 15 members and make bgs in AW 5 members each and AQ 5 members each.

    30 people is too hard to manage. It is like having a fulltime job.

    My alliance is not playing AQ anymore competitively and AW has gone to 1 BG only.

    The frustration and burn out is real.

    We all love the game but seriously real life is a priority.

    So kick 15 players. Lock your alliance. Run 1 BG for AQ and AW. Problem solved for YOU. There are still tons and tons of people out there that are just fine with being active in AQ and AW. i have 2 jobs and a family. I still find time to finish AQ and AQ, work and spend time with them. You posted in the past about being semi-retired or retired fully and looking for an alliance that fits that. Now you are in that and you want it to whittle it down even more because of how you feel? Don't join an alliance then. Go solo.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Posts: 18,552 Guardian
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    Rogue42 wrote: »
    When are you going to realize that Kabam doesn’t care about your “real” life.

    Why should they care if you don't care? If you do care, you won't damage your real life pursuing the goals in a mobile game.


    I agree with your statement but we all love mcoc. However it is unrealistic to be expected to be connected 24/7 . To invest an insane amount of time with so many events and log in times. To manage 30 adults. It is just too much.

    For the health of the game this is necessary. Just look all the retirement accounts and non active accounts.

    Just look how many alliances not playing events at all or going relax.

    At the moment, you are entirely free to throttle down, spend less time on the game, and join or create an alliance that does fewer events or even runs fewer battlegroups. What you're asking for is to force everyone else to play the game at your level of time and energy.

    And in any case, how would lowering the size of alliances help alliances that are no longer playing alliance events. If they don't want to even run map 1 or 2, that implies they wouldn't run events that only require five people, because those events only require five people. Adjusting alliance events for people who don't want to run alliance events of any size seems completely counterproductive. Creating events with high enough rewards to bring them out of retirement only seems to be an attempt to coerce players to play more than they want to, which also seems entirely the opposite the goal of allowing people to play at their own pace.
  • CapWW2CapWW2 Posts: 2,901 ★★★★
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    Rogue42 wrote: »
    When are you going to realize that Kabam doesn’t care about your “real” life.

    Why should they care if you don't care? If you do care, you won't damage your real life pursuing the goals in a mobile game.


    I agree with your statement but we all love mcoc. However it is unrealistic to be expected to be connected 24/7 . To invest an insane amount of time with so many events and log in times. To manage 30 adults. It is just too much.

    For the health of the game this is necessary. Just look all the retirement accounts and non active accounts.

    Just look how many alliances not playing events at all or going relax.

    At the moment, you are entirely free to throttle down, spend less time on the game, and join or create an alliance that does fewer events or even runs fewer battlegroups. What you're asking for is to force everyone else to play the game at your level of time and energy.

    And in any case, how would lowering the size of alliances help alliances that are no longer playing alliance events. If they don't want to even run map 1 or 2, that implies they wouldn't run events that only require five people, because those events only require five people. Adjusting alliance events for people who don't want to run alliance events of any size seems completely counterproductive. Creating events with high enough rewards to bring them out of retirement only seems to be an attempt to coerce players to play more than they want to, which also seems entirely the opposite the goal of allowing people to play at their own pace.

    Please read my post again. aQ and AW to be modified for 5 per Bg and alliances for 15 members
  • DemonzfyreDemonzfyre Posts: 20,862 ★★★★★
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    CapWW2 wrote: »
    DNA3000 wrote: »
    Rogue42 wrote: »
    When are you going to realize that Kabam doesn’t care about your “real” life.

    Why should they care if you don't care? If you do care, you won't damage your real life pursuing the goals in a mobile game.


    I agree with your statement but we all love mcoc. However it is unrealistic to be expected to be connected 24/7 . To invest an insane amount of time with so many events and log in times. To manage 30 adults. It is just too much.

    For the health of the game this is necessary. Just look all the retirement accounts and non active accounts.

    Just look how many alliances not playing events at all or going relax.

    At the moment, you are entirely free to throttle down, spend less time on the game, and join or create an alliance that does fewer events or even runs fewer battlegroups. What you're asking for is to force everyone else to play the game at your level of time and energy.

    And in any case, how would lowering the size of alliances help alliances that are no longer playing alliance events. If they don't want to even run map 1 or 2, that implies they wouldn't run events that only require five people, because those events only require five people. Adjusting alliance events for people who don't want to run alliance events of any size seems completely counterproductive. Creating events with high enough rewards to bring them out of retirement only seems to be an attempt to coerce players to play more than they want to, which also seems entirely the opposite the goal of allowing people to play at their own pace.

    Please read my post again. aQ and AW to be modified for 5 per Bg and alliances for 15 members

    @CapWW2 you've had some bad ideas in the past but this pretty much is your worst one yet. There is no way the majority of the community would ever want this. The amount of "retired" players vs competitive players is such a small percentage. Run map 1 or 2. i think you can clear it with just 5. Kabam won't redesign a game based on YOUR level of competition.
  • CapWW2CapWW2 Posts: 2,901 ★★★★
    edited May 2018
    You think is small 😂. Retired alliances will keep flowing
  • BitterSteelBitterSteel Posts: 9,254 ★★★★★
    Why change it for everyone when a lot of people are fine with it?
  • CapWW2CapWW2 Posts: 2,901 ★★★★
    Why change it for everyone when a lot of people are fine with it?

    And a lot of peopl are not fine too. It goes both ways. Just look at the best alliances. They only have half the original members. So ev
Sign In or Register to comment.