Options

Crystal Retry Button

2»

Comments

  • Options
    Zeke_the_XbotZeke_the_Xbot Posts: 331 ★★
    Crystals operate completely on random chance basis. Why the heck would I want to waste half the shards of another crystal giving up what I just got either new champ/dupe with resources gained. It isn't a super terrible idea but ultimately an illogical one with an RNG based system. Also this idea defeats the purpose of building up shards to get another crystal. It also defeats the purpose of filling up ones roster. Also think about this say you go through with giving up that first gamble and pull drop 1000 or whatever more shards to retry the crystal and get the exact same thing is it still worth it?
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    Crystals operate completely on random chance basis. Why the heck would I want to waste half the shards of another crystal giving up what I just got either new champ/dupe with resources gained. It isn't a super terrible idea but ultimately an illogical one with an RNG based system. Also this idea defeats the purpose of building up shards to get another crystal. It also defeats the purpose of filling up ones roster. Also think about this say you go through with giving up that first gamble and pull drop 1000 or whatever more shards to retry the crystal and get the exact same thing is it still worth it?

    No, it may not be worth. It also might be worth it. It's still random, just a retry. It's not excluding bad characters or anything, it's just trying to retry something. This in no way defeats the purpose of RNG, as it still uses RNG in the process.
  • Options
    RiegelRiegel Posts: 1,088 ★★★★
    Is someone websnatcher?
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    Riegel wrote: »
    Is someone websnatcher?

    Prepare to be reported by GroundedWisdom. Yes, I think that someone is Websnatcher here, but GroundedWisdom for some reason won't tolerate the name "Websnatcher" being stated.
  • Options
    GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 36,306 ★★★★★
    Riegel wrote: »
    Is someone websnatcher?

    Prepare to be reported by GroundedWisdom. Yes, I think that someone is Websnatcher here, but GroundedWisdom for some reason won't tolerate the name "Websnatcher" being stated.

    My name is beside my Avatar.
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    Riegel wrote: »
    Is someone websnatcher?

    Prepare to be reported by GroundedWisdom. Yes, I think that someone is Websnatcher here, but GroundedWisdom for some reason won't tolerate the name "Websnatcher" being stated.

    My name is beside my Avatar.

    Yes, and? What's your point? I didn't say that your name wasn't GroundedWisdom, so what do you mean?
  • Options
    RiegelRiegel Posts: 1,088 ★★★★
    I thought it could have been either wasn't saying either way, and I didn't mean it in a bad way, but I guess that answer clears that up.

    Just curious.
  • Options
    GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Posts: 36,306 ★★★★★
    Riegel wrote: »
    Is someone websnatcher?

    Prepare to be reported by GroundedWisdom. Yes, I think that someone is Websnatcher here, but GroundedWisdom for some reason won't tolerate the name "Websnatcher" being stated.

    My name is beside my Avatar.

    Yes, and? What's your point? I didn't say that your name wasn't GroundedWisdom, so what do you mean?

    The point is you keep insisting I am Websnatcher and I've told you my name. You're having a hard time seeing your own actions in general, aren't you?
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    edited May 2017
    Riegel wrote: »
    Is someone websnatcher?

    Prepare to be reported by GroundedWisdom. Yes, I think that someone is Websnatcher here, but GroundedWisdom for some reason won't tolerate the name "Websnatcher" being stated.

    My name is beside my Avatar.

    Yes, and? What's your point? I didn't say that your name wasn't GroundedWisdom, so what do you mean?

    The point is you keep insisting I am Websnatcher and I've told you my name. You're having a hard time seeing your own actions in general, aren't you?

    I didn't insist you were Websnatcher at all. Where is this coming from? And you know what? Since we're going down this nit-picky road where we report people for abuse when they go off-topic, you have been reported.
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    Look, GroundedWisdom. I've PM'd you, and you haven't responded, so I guess we need to have this conversation here. You are trying to make a new name for yourself in these new forums. I'm just going to say that I would bet money that you are Websnatcher. Many people didn't like you in the old forums, so you're trying to overcome that name here. I respect that. If you don't want me to talk about it, I won't. The problem is, I asked you about it, and you reported me for abuse. I respected you and stopped talking about it, but was confused at why you would report me over it, so I asked you to undo it. You reported me again on that comment. I don't care if you want a new identity. You can do whatever the heck you want. But by being so quick to jump the gun and hit that flag button anytime someone says "Websnatcher", it makes more people think that you are him. You used the lame excuse that I was "off-topic" to defend your petty reporting of me, but no one is going to buy that forever. I'm not trying to call you out at all, but you're just coming into my threads to reopen the conversation that you so desperately tried to close earlier. Riegel asked about Websnatcher, and I answered. I never said that he was you, or that you were him in this thread. I'm not initiating any conversations that do so since you obviously wanted me to stop the first time I said something. But when you follow me around, degrade my ideas, and then say something about Websnatcher, the conversation is inevitably going to end up the exact same way it did last time: I'm mad at you for unreasonably reporting me, you're mad at me for seemingly calling you out, the moderators are mad at us for going off-topic, and the thread owner is wondering why things went down the road it went down. If you stop bringing the Websnatcher account into things, I will too. But when you call out my ideas and then say something about me calling you Websnatcher, I'm going to deny it since it's untrue. You just opened a can of worms, but you don't want worms to be everywhere. Please allow me to close that can. I don't want to hurt your hand when I slam the lid shut. Thank you in advance for ending the conversation.
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    Anyone else have comments? I think that GroundedWisdom and I are done bickering like children, so I'd love for the conversation to continue in a somewhat logical manner. Let me know if you have any ideas about this.
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    I really think that this would be beneficial to many people. It wouldn't harm anyone, it would simply be an alternative to back yourself up.
  • Options
    CrusherOfDreamsCrusherOfDreams Posts: 1,370 ★★★
    My last 4 star crystal, the one I spent 125k Scrap on, gave me a 4 star Cap dupe. I don't use Cap. This is what the button would be used for.
Sign In or Register to comment.