Options
10+ days
ForumName123
Member Posts: 522 ★★★
Alliance lvl 1 team revives have been absent from the loyalty store for more than 10 days. It's starting to be a bit ridiculous. That's one full AQ rotation > another without the ability to buy and stock up.
0
Comments
As if people actually have a problem with people asking why the level 1 alliance revives haven’t been in the store lately. Regardless of why or how they need them, it doesn’t matter to you.
Childish people always find something to complain about.
Or it could pop up 3x in 5 days also improbable
Turtle back to your map 3, tier 12 wars child.
Furthermore, there's no easy colloquial way to characterize "if you don't need them then you don't need to comment" except in terms of the general idea of agreement and disagreement. But if you prefer, or rather you have the specific requirement to have things put to you in a more precise manner, then any statement that a poster makes on the forums should be considered a public statement that can be replied to or rebutted in any way, by any other poster, including but not limited to direct refutation, indirect refutation, general agreement, specific agreement, topic expansion, generalization, amplification, corollary, logical extrapolation, tangentiation, inspiration, semantic connection, referentiation, interrogation, or encapsulation, or any combination thereof.
It is also not "shaming" to tell someone that if they are running out of a resource, then perhaps they should modify their play to reduce the need for that resource. And more specifically if you're doing content you find difficult to do with the time, resources, roster, and skill level you possess, the correct thing to do is to reduce the difficulty of the content you're doing because no one is entitled to do any specific tier of content, or entitled to have a way to gain the resources they need to do it.
Just because the internet gave everyone a voice, doesn’t mean everyone needs to hear it.
In fact, people make comments about the game all the time. They make requests, they ask questions, they critique it. There is no fundamental requirement that the people replying have professional insight into the topic being discussed. This is a forum for players and players' opinions and discussions. If you are unwilling to hear what other players think of your post, you should not post here. That's what gives them the right to respond to the OP, and you the right to respond to me.
To put it bluntly, anyone can suggest or ask for anything, but they must be willing to hear the voices of the players who think they shouldn't or that the game would be worse off for it or that the player may not have reasonable expectations. There is no forum rule that says players cannot be "negative," the definition of "derailed" is not "the people replying don't react positively to the poster" and no one has the right to dictate how other people choose to respond to their posts.
In any event, I don't have the right or power to dictate how you post either, and that includes your right to attempt to dissuade others from responding to a post in a particular way. I'm simply stating, for the benefit of anyone that might be confused, that they have the right to respond in any way they see fit so long as their post falls within the rules of the forum and anyone suggesting otherwise is simply wrong. People should be cordial and respectful, but they have no obligation to be positive.
If the poster you're referring to tried to do the content you're doing now and couldn't, would he be justified in saying that the problem was the game didn't give him enough resources to do it? If he needed twice the revives you do, or ten times the revives you do, would he be justified in saying that there were not enough revives and they should be increased until he could do Map 7?
I've seen Map 7 and I know enough to know I don't want to run it every day, or really any day. I could, but it would be expensive and I wouldn't be enjoying myself. But is that because I'm not good enough to run it sustainably, or is that because the game is at fault for not giving me enough stuff to run it?
No one should be judging you for needing revives in Map 7, and I don't think that's what this is about. I'm sure I would need more of them than you do. But why should the game change to make them available enough for you, and not for me, or him, or anyone else? Where's that line drawn? Who should get to demand more resources, and who should be told to step down to a lower difficulty because it is beyond them? Shouldn't *everyone* be told to try to play within their means, just to be fair?