**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

Sig stone idea!

So ive been having an issue with 5* sig stones... Im capped on some types like tech while nearly completely empty on other like cosmic and science. I had the idea of a system where you can trade five +1 sig stones in for a +5 sig stone of that class. Think this is a good idea?

Comments

  • Lvernon15Lvernon15 Posts: 11,596 ★★★★★
    They need to be made available, that’s the issue with sigs, if you aren’t spending you can hardly get any
  • Barter33Barter33 Posts: 7
    Lvernon15 said:

    They need to be made available, that’s the issue with sigs, if you aren’t spending you can hardly get any

    Agreed this is a little different thing though
  • TP33TP33 Posts: 1,577 ★★★★
    Good idea OP although knowing kabam I think saying 5 sig stones for 3 of a selectable class is more reasonable. I would like to see more trading systems and an update to the terrible T4CC system that serves for whales and literally no actual players
  • Panchulon21Panchulon21 Posts: 2,605 ★★★★★
    In the case signature stones I would rather give it to yondu ultron than trade them the way we trade t4cc. It’s a rip off but at least t4cc are readily
    Available. Sigs are not. If I have them expiring of course.
  • SevSynSevSyn Posts: 72
    why not just remove the capacity limit? .... same with iso/catalysts... then we wouldn't have so many unopened crystals (which they have noted in the past slows down their servers)
Sign In or Register to comment.