4* Cavalier objective
Harvey1980
Member Posts: 30 ★
Imagine telling summoners in a forum announcement that there was a SINGLE extra objective to complete a path in each quest with a team of 4* or less. You may have missed it because they released a book of information on this months content.
Imagine you went for your initial clear, starting with a 4* team but after 1.1, you didn’t have a decent team ranked up for 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 so you did those with 5 and 6*. Imagine that when you got to 3.1 you thought “I’ve got a 4* team for this” and completed that quest. Not so for 3.2 so back to 5 and 6* for now.
Now imagine you rank up some champs and start completing some 4* paths. Only now do you pay attention to the pop up you normally dismiss that says you get a reward for doing this quest with 4*. Funny. There was no mention of this. Lets look at these objectives. Hmm. I haven’t collected 3.1 which is worrying as I’ve done that. I hope it’s not a chain.
Now imagine you actually read the objectives. Interesting. No mention of it being a chain. In fact it doesn’t even say complete the path, just beat the boss with a 4*.
Now imagine when you complete paths 2.1 and 2.2 and the reward for 3.1 doesn’t unlock you decide to contact Kabam.
Imagine querying where it says they have to be done in order. Point out that there is no mention you can find of it being a chain you have to do in order, but a SINGLE objective. Imagine pointing out that the need to do them in order makes no sense because there is ZERO difference to the challenge.
Imagine asking “can you point me to where you have told me that it’s a chain objective?”
Imagine getting a response where your questions are ignored and then they close the case.
No need for me to imagine. Cos it’s just happened.
Thanks Kabam
See you next Tuesday Sirs.
Imagine you went for your initial clear, starting with a 4* team but after 1.1, you didn’t have a decent team ranked up for 1.2, 2.1 and 2.2 so you did those with 5 and 6*. Imagine that when you got to 3.1 you thought “I’ve got a 4* team for this” and completed that quest. Not so for 3.2 so back to 5 and 6* for now.
Now imagine you rank up some champs and start completing some 4* paths. Only now do you pay attention to the pop up you normally dismiss that says you get a reward for doing this quest with 4*. Funny. There was no mention of this. Lets look at these objectives. Hmm. I haven’t collected 3.1 which is worrying as I’ve done that. I hope it’s not a chain.
Now imagine you actually read the objectives. Interesting. No mention of it being a chain. In fact it doesn’t even say complete the path, just beat the boss with a 4*.
Now imagine when you complete paths 2.1 and 2.2 and the reward for 3.1 doesn’t unlock you decide to contact Kabam.
Imagine querying where it says they have to be done in order. Point out that there is no mention you can find of it being a chain you have to do in order, but a SINGLE objective. Imagine pointing out that the need to do them in order makes no sense because there is ZERO difference to the challenge.
Imagine asking “can you point me to where you have told me that it’s a chain objective?”
Imagine getting a response where your questions are ignored and then they close the case.
No need for me to imagine. Cos it’s just happened.
Thanks Kabam
See you next Tuesday Sirs.
2
Comments
The intent there is to only get the 6/6 objective once you've completed all others.
Now you can question whether they should have chained them or not but I think in their existing framework it would be not possible to get the big bump on the end one without chaining.
Yeah. Just look at that wonderful description of a chain of objectives. Very clear it’s not a single objective. Oh wait ...
All of our objectives are Chains and are actually called Objective Chains. This has been the case since they were introduced.
I will raise this to the team for future consideration.
As in, well I only actually used the 4* in the Boss fight, even though I have some other 5* on the team that was not used for Boss.
Could also be clarified if they change wording to say “defeat a PATH... using a team of ALL...” instead of “defeat the Boss”.
But no way should this be 6 different base-level objectives. A single objective in 6 escalating parts is in line with how lots of other multi-level objectives are.
Oh wait, that's what I did.