AW engineering AKA Cheating

KaaldootKaaldoot Member Posts: 8
My alliance is currently engaged with far more superior alliance ( alliance matchmaking still questionable ), what concerns me is They have strategically placed only 4 player for defence and in attack they have all 10 players active to score maximum attack points.. Other alliance is active and they couldn't place defender ..that theory is not valid cause they had all 10 active when attack started like they been waiting and planned it that way.
My question / concern is it fair play ? Should this be allowed ? Hope Kabam atleast notice this and put some thoughts on this.
«1

Comments

  • KaaldootKaaldoot Member Posts: 8

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
  • Agent_X_zzzAgent_X_zzz Member Posts: 4,498 ★★★★★
    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
  • The_Sentry06The_Sentry06 Member Posts: 7,783 ★★★★★
    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    So how is this cheating in any way?
    You are basically complaining about them placing a defense
  • GAMEOVERJamesGAMEOVERJames Member Posts: 905 ★★★
    Well, if they didn’t put defenders in AW, your alliance as attacker should be much easy to reach the final Boss, right? What do you mean by “Strategically”? I think they just forgot to place defenders by some reasons, or just didn’t care about AW.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,488 ★★★★★
    To be clear, that sneak attack is legit, albeit a Hail Mary. In order to be successful, you need to be sure your Attack is better than the other side. Overall though, it's within the rules of the game. People can play Attack and not add Defense.
  • JamesPuffJamesPuff Member Posts: 55
    Ive heard of that strategy. It’s garbage.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,488 ★★★★★
    I mean, we've had guys that missed placement who joined, but never as an intentional ploy. Foolish, really.
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,077 ★★★★★
    It’s not a strategy, it’s a forfeit
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,488 ★★★★★

    It’s not a strategy, it’s a forfeit

    That depends on the ability of the other side I guess.
  • TheBestinTuakauTheBestinTuakau Member Posts: 955 ★★★

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
  • JueVioleGraceJueVioleGrace Member Posts: 1,424 ★★★★★

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
    Less defenders you would have to go up against.
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,488 ★★★★★

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
    Hard to die to an empty node usually
    "Usually." XD
  • JamesPuffJamesPuff Member Posts: 55

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
    Hard to die to an empty node usually
    I die all the time to empty nodes in t2. And I usually face them a lot...

    Not.
  • Lvernon15Lvernon15 Member Posts: 11,598 ★★★★★

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
    Hard to die to an empty node usually
    With your season I’m assuming that’s why you put usually...
  • KaaldootKaaldoot Member Posts: 8
    To all the intellectuals of the game.. if leader and officer can call for attack he can very well call for defence too.. so apply your brain please. I've been playing game since launch and I know what is worth reporting and what is not.. above statement highlights 2 potential issues .. 1) Matchmaking 2) War engineering which is gradually becoming common. Boss nodes should be easy - this statement can only be made by a noob .. if you read node right and place absolut fit 6 star R2 duped Defender.. how your alliance players supposed to clear that .. where their PI is 4-5 K .
    Don't write to mock me here, instead don't write and follow community guidelines.
    I only need Kabam' attention here.
    And I am not whining about AW loss .. I am talking about " FAIRPLAY" ..
  • danielmathdanielmath Member Posts: 4,077 ★★★★★
    Lvernon15 said:

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
    Hard to die to an empty node usually
    With your season I’m assuming that’s why you put usually...
    Woah! Only 2 deaths today buddy, back off
  • JamesPuffJamesPuff Member Posts: 55

    Lvernon15 said:

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
    Hard to die to an empty node usually
    With your season I’m assuming that’s why you put usually...
    Woah! Only 2 deaths today buddy, back off
    Yikes... Two deaths.
  • MasterpuffMasterpuff Member Posts: 6,469 ★★★★★

    Let's try to stay civil, please.

    Why am I muted
  • Lvernon15Lvernon15 Member Posts: 11,598 ★★★★★

    Lvernon15 said:

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?

    Kaaldoot said:

    Isn't having less defense better for your alliance?

    If you read " far more superior" .. they are Cavs and above .. those defenders only on key boss nodes.. how this will be good for S2 Alliance of mine .. :(
    less defenders = good
    How so?
    Hard to die to an empty node usually
    With your season I’m assuming that’s why you put usually...
    Woah! Only 2 deaths today buddy, back off
    Grats
  • GroundedWisdomGroundedWisdom Member Posts: 36,488 ★★★★★
    Kaaldoot said:

    To all the intellectuals of the game.. if leader and officer can call for attack he can very well call for defence too.. so apply your brain please. I've been playing game since launch and I know what is worth reporting and what is not.. above statement highlights 2 potential issues .. 1) Matchmaking 2) War engineering which is gradually becoming common. Boss nodes should be easy - this statement can only be made by a noob .. if you read node right and place absolut fit 6 star R2 duped Defender.. how your alliance players supposed to clear that .. where their PI is 4-5 K .
    Don't write to mock me here, instead don't write and follow community guidelines.
    I only need Kabam' attention here.
    And I am not whining about AW loss .. I am talking about " FAIRPLAY" ..

    Matchmaking is a whole other subject, and I'm with you on that one. I'm just not getting into that at the moment because the conversation will never end. As for the second, I'm afraid that placing a strong Boss grouping and nothing else is within the rules of playing. Ambushing might be dirty, but it's not against any rules.
Sign In or Register to comment.