Morningstar-Mephisto Synergy and vice versa
SHIELD
Member Posts: 90 ★
What is the point of Mephisto and Morningstar both having the Soul Seeker Unique Synergy if they don't stack. By doing that, it's doubling up for no reason as it only counts once but you need both for the synergy.
0
Comments
Yes, but why put it as a synergy for each other on both of them. The only way to get their unique synergy is to have both of them in the team. So to give them both the same synergy is redundant, no?
That doesn't sound right. It's probably just a waste of one of theirs but supposed to be worth it for the bonus?
Mephisto gets +1 soul as a synergy
Morningstar +1 power bar as a synergy
They only show both on each because they are tied to each other. But since they are tied to each other they put the description in that the synergy can only happen 1x and not multiple times. It actually makes sense and isn't a waste of a spot at all for synergy.
Of course they are tied to each other. It's a "synergy". That's exactly my point. You can't have a synergy without both of them in your party, so the fact that both have an active synergy (blue color and not greyed out) but only 1 counts, means that it's a waste.
How is it a waste? Its how synergy works lol.
It's the only unique synergy in the game that is listed on both of the synergizing characters, so it is a wasted synergy slot on one of them that could have been used for something else.
Its an overpowered synergy what else do you want?
Consistency. It only needs to be on one of them, not both. Even if they don't replace it with a different synergy it is a wasted of data to have on both if nothing else.
There is nothing that is consistent in this game. Iceman gets incinerate damage in LOL, Blade doesn't trigger danger sense on Magik in LOL, this game is the most inconsistent game out there so I don't understand why you expect consistency?
I completely agree with you on that, but it doesn't mean that we shouldn't at least point things out the forum.
There is also a lack of consistency of moderators answering posts that really should be answered. When things like this that are 100% inconsistent to the rest of the game we should expect an explanation/answer.
I read that over and it sounds more harsh than intended. I wasn't meaning to slam the moderators but only to point out that issues like this really should have answers.