It's almost unplayable. Korg on mixmaster every war. I'll see the whole team sit on him for 12 hours without trying to fight him.
Korg on mix master is much easier nowadays without protect or stubborn. Havok, apoc, gambit, omega red, prof X, proxima, Quake, etc; and he's a goner.
Mole Man.
Yes mole man the amazing thorns counter
He can deal with Mixmaster. Excuse me for throwing out a suggestion.
A bad suggestion though. Should be called out.
There's a way to say it without being ignorant.
A bit snarky? Sure. Ignorant? Nah, that would be suggesting Moleman for a thorns fight
I see. So if someone offers a suggestion that you think might not work, then that's ignorant? A simple counterclaim would suffice. People are here to exchange ideas. Not to throw shade for someone participating. Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer to communicate with a modicum of respect towards the person, as opposed to labeling them as their ideas.
Or you can take an L with some dignity instead of becoming defensive. You made a mistake. A simple "Oh my bad, didn't think about thorns" and then moved on with the rest of your day instead of backing yourself into a corner to play a victim of a non-issue.
At what point did I argue that I was right? That wasn't the issue. The issue is the ignorant tone that people take correcting someone. If you think people are becoming defensive, perhaps the delivery is combative.
It's almost unplayable. Korg on mixmaster every war. I'll see the whole team sit on him for 12 hours without trying to fight him.
Korg on mix master is much easier nowadays without protect or stubborn. Havok, apoc, gambit, omega red, prof X, proxima, Quake, etc; and he's a goner.
Mole Man.
Yes mole man the amazing thorns counter
He can deal with Mixmaster. Excuse me for throwing out a suggestion.
A bad suggestion though. Should be called out.
There's a way to say it without being ignorant.
A bit snarky? Sure. Ignorant? Nah, that would be suggesting Moleman for a thorns fight
I see. So if someone offers a suggestion that you think might not work, then that's ignorant? A simple counterclaim would suffice. People are here to exchange ideas. Not to throw shade for someone participating. Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer to communicate with a modicum of respect towards the person, as opposed to labeling them as their ideas.
Or you can take an L with some dignity instead of becoming defensive. You made a mistake. A simple "Oh my bad, didn't think about thorns" and then moved on with the rest of your day instead of backing yourself into a corner to play a victim of a non-issue.
At what point did I argue that I was right? That wasn't the issue. The issue is the ignorant tone that people take correcting someone. If you think people are becoming defensive, perhaps the delivery is combative.
You didn't argue you were correct. But you also didn't own up to your mistake.
Even dogs know when they've made a mistake and they'll react in two ways, they'll be apologetic and own up to their mistake, or they'll growl and be defiant. You're being the latter in this scenario. Learn to accept being wrong and move on so you don't find yourself placed in a combative situation. It's really not that difficult to suck up a little pride and walk away after.
Let me see. So you're comparing me to be lesser than a dog, and trying to sell the idea that the responses to me weren't disrespectful. Hahahaha. Thanks for the chuckle.
Let me see. So you're comparing me to be lesser than a dog, and trying to sell the idea that the responses to me weren't disrespectful. Hahahaha. Thanks for the chuckle.
Where did I say you were lesser than a dog? You're doing a great job in playing the victim again. I made a comparison about animals knowing appropriate manners when in a situation that they know they're in the wrong. Jesus Christ, I know I'm autistic, but even I have the basic grasp of social interaction and etiquette. You should probably learn those two things and have a better time dealing with confrontation.
You just compared me to a dog, dude. Not only compared, indicated that dogs were more skilled at admitting their faults. Only, I didn't dodge that fact. I said there's a way to point out the flaw in someone's ideas without being an ###h##e.
You just compared me to a dog, dude. Not only compared, indicated that dogs were more skilled at admitting their faults. Only, I didn't dodge that fact. I said there's a way to point out the flaw in someone's ideas without being an ###h##e.
Playing the victim card yet again. Do they give you a free coffee when you get 10 stamps on it?
Yeah, I compared one mammal to another mammal. Both with the capability of learning and understanding. Both with a level of intelligence. But you know what, I guess whatever childhood trauma you're holding onto that prevents you from admitting when you're wrong and avoiding confrontation just isn't something you're willing to overcome.
Keep living that way, it won't make you any happier or a better person.
It's almost unplayable. Korg on mixmaster every war. I'll see the whole team sit on him for 12 hours without trying to fight him.
Korg on mix master is much easier nowadays without protect or stubborn. Havok, apoc, gambit, omega red, prof X, proxima, Quake, etc; and he's a goner.
Mole Man.
Yes mole man the amazing thorns counter
He can deal with Mixmaster. Excuse me for throwing out a suggestion.
A bad suggestion though. Should be called out.
There's a way to say it without being ignorant.
A bit snarky? Sure. Ignorant? Nah, that would be suggesting Moleman for a thorns fight
I see. So if someone offers a suggestion that you think might not work, then that's ignorant? A simple counterclaim would suffice. People are here to exchange ideas. Not to throw shade for someone participating. Call me old-fashioned, but I prefer to communicate with a modicum of respect towards the person, as opposed to labeling them as their ideas.
Or you can take an L with some dignity instead of becoming defensive. You made a mistake. A simple "Oh my bad, didn't think about thorns" and then moved on with the rest of your day instead of backing yourself into a corner to play a victim of a non-issue.
At what point did I argue that I was right? That wasn't the issue. The issue is the ignorant tone that people take correcting someone. If you think people are becoming defensive, perhaps the delivery is combative.
This thread has derailed into arguments and personal attacks. Please keep in mind that this is this is not allowed. Closing this thread to prevent further issues.
Comments
Even dogs know when they've made a mistake and they'll react in two ways, they'll be apologetic and own up to their mistake, or they'll growl and be defiant. You're being the latter in this scenario. Learn to accept being wrong and move on so you don't find yourself placed in a combative situation. It's really not that difficult to suck up a little pride and walk away after.
Yeah, I compared one mammal to another mammal. Both with the capability of learning and understanding. Both with a level of intelligence. But you know what, I guess whatever childhood trauma you're holding onto that prevents you from admitting when you're wrong and avoiding confrontation just isn't something you're willing to overcome.
Keep living that way, it won't make you any happier or a better person.