True focus being removed was the right call

KindaGomans3KindaGomans3 Member Posts: 174 ★
in General Discussion
Just wanted a poll I always though that blanket fix was always a problem glade they made the right call

True focus being removed was the right call 45 votes

Yes
82%
BitterSteelHaji_SaabWorld EaterSonSonfmussapthanks4playingDarkrider05pseudosaneThefire13KindaGomans3Kacar99KerneasMathking13silentagRabangaKappa2gBugmat78EtjamaMobile_P0tat0Mother_Flerken 37 votes
No
17%
SpeedbumpTotal_Domin01cx23433CapdevilasebCritCapDigamberGodliekmarino123 8 votes

Comments

  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • KerneasKerneas Member Posts: 3,825 ★★★★★
    Yes
    It was stupidly limiting. I don't see a reason why Stryfe, Prof X, Ebony or Ham should be so limited.

    If I am right and the node was designed to counter Quake and Ghost, it'd be better if they introduced attacker bans in the first place.
  • FlyGalaxyBombFlyGalaxyBomb Member Posts: 778 ★★★
    I wouldn't say it was the right or wrong call. They didn't nerf kitty which is great but at the same time, now without true focus, war just got a whole lot easier. Especially with the global nodes we have right now, wars are gonna be close (score wise). The time tie breaker system is definitely gonna become more in-affect to many AW pushing allies.
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • pseudosanepseudosane Member, Guardian Posts: 3,991 Guardian
    Yes
    FlyGalaxyBomb said:

    I wouldn't say it was the right or wrong call. They didn't nerf kitty which is great but at the same time, now without true focus, war just got a whole lot easier. Especially with the global nodes we have right now, wars are gonna be close (score wise). The time tie breaker system is definitely gonna become more in-affect to many AW pushing allies.

    Things will shake up when high ground comes.
    High ground currently, really sucks.
Sign In or Register to comment.