Uhhh what is this war match

2»

Comments

  • OkizzeOkizze Member Posts: 45
    Both alliances using shells are the ones benefiting from this. It looks like they’re taking advantage of kabams poorly designed matchmaking system. It’s hard not to feel bad for these alliances with the misfortune of matching them.
  • SaltygoodnessSaltygoodness Member Posts: 355 ★★
    Shouldn't there be a way to prevent an alliance with 3100 rating from matching a 2700, as in matching should be done with alliances of a similar war rating (let's say +/- 100 points in war rating between opponents is still reasonable, but not 400?)

    The matching system needs improvement

    If anyone looks into it it also would be nice to forbid repeat matchups of the same two opponents during the same season, it's just boring
  • pseudosanepseudosane Member, Guardian Posts: 3,945 Guardian
    Almost feels like the age of activity of an alliance is being used as a parameter in matchmaking to get easier matchups.
    Does anyone know what Iso8A( D69 shell) and XK9 matched this season?
  • Mad_Titan_ThanosMad_Titan_Thanos Member Posts: 78

    Almost feels like the age of activity of an alliance is being used as a parameter in matchmaking to get easier matchups.
    Does anyone know what Iso8A( D69 shell) and XK9 matched this season?

    Yeah, a few friends of mine and I run a spreadsheet that helps us keep track of who has who throughout a season. XK9 has had F&G, SGA-1, SSx-1, and A-XMN. As for iso8a, they have had LOXC, Ny718, Another shell ally (Stella Deus), and then the alliance that they happened to get matched with last war
  • Run477Run477 Member Posts: 1,391 ★★★



    We are facing an alliance that is expert rank 2, we are platinum 3 ranked 60 and we have a 360 point difference in power, this should not have originated in any way. But as always the support team shines for giving an answer.

    Seems like an even matchup to me. We die a lot 🥴
  • Run477Run477 Member Posts: 1,391 ★★★

    Almost feels like the age of activity of an alliance is being used as a parameter in matchmaking to get easier matchups.
    Does anyone know what Iso8A( D69 shell) and XK9 matched this season?

    Keep my alliance name, out your ******* mouth.
    -Blaine probably
  • Run477Run477 Member Posts: 1,391 ★★★
    To be clear—war matchmaking is messed up right now. We should not be facing back-to-back plat 3 allies. Our whole ally has 4-6 r4 champs. We fought multiple r2 defenders last war. But I will say, the ally we faced put a lot of thought into defense and I will probably steal some of their placements.
  • Mad_Titan_ThanosMad_Titan_Thanos Member Posts: 78
    Run477 said:

    To be clear—war matchmaking is messed up right now. We should not be facing back-to-back plat 3 allies. Our whole ally has 4-6 r4 champs. We fought multiple r2 defenders last war. But I will say, the ally we faced put a lot of thought into defense and I will probably steal some of their placements.

    Are you XK9 or iso8a?
  • Run477Run477 Member Posts: 1,391 ★★★

    Run477 said:



    We are facing an alliance that is expert rank 2, we are platinum 3 ranked 60 and we have a 360 point difference in power, this should not have originated in any way. But as always the support team shines for giving an answer.

    Seems like an even matchup to me. We die a lot 🥴
    We just want every war to be fair for every alliance, we won't waste resources on bugs that aren't returned. And if any alliance is taking advantage of something to get this type of matchmaking, they should be sanctioned accordingly.
    You can’t “take advantage of matchmaking” anymore. Our war rating is 3100+. We shouldn’t match a 2700 ally.
  • OkizzeOkizze Member Posts: 45


    Fix this kabam
Sign In or Register to comment.