For a lot of players. thats more than 4 of my posts being disagreed at once
For a lot of players.
This is giving me flashbacks to that thread "Either Nerf Doom or Give Everyone Doom."
For a lot of players. thats more than 4 of my posts being disagreed at once I haven't laughed so hard on the forums in awhile. Thanks @Real_Madrid_76_2
I guess my roster is just more robust than I thought it was. There's nothing wrong with saying *you* don't need more than 600 a week. That's not a statement for *a lot of players*. What’s “a lot”? Well based on the fact that not a single person has agreed with anything you've said, probably all of them.
I guess my roster is just more robust than I thought it was. There's nothing wrong with saying *you* don't need more than 600 a week. That's not a statement for *a lot of players*. What’s “a lot”?
I guess my roster is just more robust than I thought it was. There's nothing wrong with saying *you* don't need more than 600 a week. That's not a statement for *a lot of players*.
I guess my roster is just more robust than I thought it was.
I guess my roster is just more robust than I thought it was. There's nothing wrong with saying *you* don't need more than 600 a week. That's not a statement for *a lot of players*. What’s “a lot”? Well based on the fact that not a single person has agreed with anything you've said, probably all of them. Fortunately for me I don’t need anyone to agree with me to be confident in my assessment. I’ll simply take satisfaction in the fact that the store will be updated, probably very soon, and that will be all the proof I need that my appraisal was correct.
It’s all good we just disagree. My experience is I have 30 r3s and 4 r4s. My ally only does map 5x5….. I can continue to make r2s, and a few r3s I probably won’t use, just to do it…. But then id prob be out of gold…. Routinely have t5b expiring along with t2a…. There’s surely 10s of thousands of players farther along then me. I just assume they also find nothing much useful in the glory storeJust my take. I’d guess the majority of folks disagreeing with me are probably not paragon, maybe not even TB? dunno. Seems odd so many find glory store so relevant still but, ok.
I guess my roster is just more robust than I thought it was. There's nothing wrong with saying *you* don't need more than 600 a week. That's not a statement for *a lot of players*. What’s “a lot”? Well based on the fact that not a single person has agreed with anything you've said, probably all of them. Fortunately for me I don’t need anyone to agree with me to be confident in my assessment. I’ll simply take satisfaction in the fact that the store will be updated, probably very soon, and that will be all the proof I need that my appraisal was correct. That's like claiming the Sun loves you and asserting the proof is that it will rise over head tomorrow.Actually, maybe worse because I don't see how updating the glory store would prove most players don't need much glory: updating the glory store would tend to more obviously demonstrate that the majority of players could use more glory, or alternatively cheaper items to stretch their glory farther. For most players that don't need much glory, an update to the glory store wouldn't help them regardless.Technically no one "needs" glory for some definition of need. Once upon a time there was no glory and no glory store. But in terms of what would be nominally useful to most players, most players could make use of far more than 600 glory. In fact, I would be hard pressed to imagine a player that could *only* make good use of 600 glory. Its easier to spend zero than to spend 600.
I guess my roster is just more robust than I thought it was. There's nothing wrong with saying *you* don't need more than 600 a week. That's not a statement for *a lot of players*. What’s “a lot”? Well based on the fact that not a single person has agreed with anything you've said, probably all of them. Fortunately for me I don’t need anyone to agree with me to be confident in my assessment. I’ll simply take satisfaction in the fact that the store will be updated, probably very soon, and that will be all the proof I need that my appraisal was correct. That's like claiming the Sun loves you and asserting the proof is that it will rise over head tomorrow.Actually, maybe worse because I don't see how updating the glory store would prove most players don't need much glory: updating the glory store would tend to more obviously demonstrate that the majority of players could use more glory, or alternatively cheaper items to stretch their glory farther. For most players that don't need much glory, an update to the glory store wouldn't help them regardless.Technically no one "needs" glory for some definition of need. Once upon a time there was no glory and no glory store. But in terms of what would be nominally useful to most players, most players could make use of far more than 600 glory. In fact, I would be hard pressed to imagine a player that could *only* make good use of 600 glory. Its easier to spend zero than to spend 600. The majority, near all the items in the store, are available by other means and are frequently expiring in my experience. For that reason glory isn’t very valuable to me and I’d assume, maybe incorrectly to many others. The only explanation is people ranking simply to rank. Not bc they Willa fault use the champs they’re ranking. I never rank a champ I have no plan to use. I don’t understand that exercise. Updating the glory store. Adding t6b and t3a would absolutely make glory more valuable, EG loyalty. Not a very valued resource just a month ago. Not anymore.
Bait post