**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Comments
An r4 Rintrah has 64k base hp. Unless you're using Mr. Negative, it's almost always a timeout.
You're awfully confident in that assertion though. Do you have some inside knowledge into Kabam's matchmaking you'd like to share?
But this guy sandbagged anyway.
There was just no way to win against this unless he gets at least 4 2* pulls.
That’s why Battlegrounds should really be renamed to Battlerosters.
Facing stronger opponents is overall ok, but the current matchmaking, wich obviously takes your roster into consideration, is not.
Ya man i get stuff like this and i only have 3 r3s and i just get completely impossible people to win against to the point bg is not fun at all
I do face 3-4 mil accounts here and there and I have managed to snag a couple wins against them this season but some matches u know that u are gonna lose so just gotta look forward to the next one. But as I said most of my opponents have been in the range of 1.5-2.5 mil since season 1
But if we are all fighting for same rewards, it should be open game based on tier just like AW. If we all start in bronze 3 every season does this mean an ugly first week or two for lower players, it sure does. However it would even put fairly quickly as all the stronger players would move up way faster then they currently do under very flawed current system.
This flawed current system is what is causing stronger players to sandbag or roster manipulation as they don't want to take 2 weeks to just get out of silver which because they are stuck playing only the top players.
New week, new opportunities, +50 new 6* sig stones... soon 200 sig 🥰
If they just answer this question we can know if it's actually working as intended or not and put these arguments to bed.
If you check my post history, you will notice I've made no complaints about matchmaking until recently. I'm not sure why I would start making things up. The truth is I'm facing a ton of people with sometimes a dozen r4 (Not always obviously but the frequency has gone radically up)
AW has tiers and doesn't reset everyone to zero to avoid these complaints. How many AW matchmaking complaints have you seen recently compared to BG? If many people are complaining about something, I like to think that there's a problem somewhere
You singled on on one piece of the argument and completely ignored the rest which makes what I'm saying pretty much what you are saying.
Everyone in AW competes for same rewards. Everyone in one specific tier can face anyone in that tier. Alliances do NOT start all at see place at new season. We've seen all alliances start at same starting place and it was Exactly the same as what this happening now at the start of each BG season.
We've also seen in AW when they matched alliances based on prestige. It was a disaster and quickly abandoned. It causes week noob alliances to place extremely high in AW and get better rewards than alliances fae better than them.
If someone cannot be at a player, why should they get the same or better rewards than that player?
My entire post is that the current matchmaking system sucks. How you came to that conclusion from it is beyond me.
While everyone starts from the same point it should be a free for all, but hopefully they will see sense and stratify things, either through starting points, or just separate out leagues and rewards.