Anyone else find EQ "Thronebreaker" disappointing

BabyMiikeBabyMiike Member Posts: 1,184 ★★★★
With thronebreaker, and paragon players waiting since the thronebreaker title came out for a EQ new difficulty. We have have maybe hyped up the new EQ to much.
I was super excited for the new difficulty once it was announced hoping for a challenging EQ for once. I remember when we only had UC and that was difficult and Seatin would make a vid on how to defeat the bosses. Regardless I found the new EQ to be honestly disappointing with it basically being as hard as cavalier, is just with more health and longer fights. Thronebreaker should've been has hard as cavalier was when it came out. I also found the rewards to be disappointing they give us like 1/4 r4 resources more then we got with cavalier, because of the solo event they had. The entire Thronebreaker EQ seemed rushed with the nodes just a copy and paste of cavalier, I was personally hoping they were gonna be a bit like act 8 nodes. But anyway what do you guys think?

Comments

  • SearmenisSearmenis Member Posts: 1,665 ★★★★★
    For these rewards, yeah, I don't really want something more difficult that will take double my time to finish a path. When the time will come, and ftp or casual spenders paragon players will be able to own a full set of attackers in each class, yes, then and only then (next year), bring the pain and boost the rewards.
  • Aomine_Daiki10Aomine_Daiki10 Member Posts: 1,653 ★★★★★
    It's fine the rewards fit the difficulty
  • SandPounderSandPounder Member Posts: 357 ★★★
    More annoyed that they chose the Tag-tical advantage globals to introduce the difficulty level.
  • PikoluPikolu Member, Guardian Posts: 7,981 Guardian
    My expectations were set very low, so I wasn't disappointed
  • DshuDshu Member Posts: 1,507 ★★★★
    The biggest disappointment was the way they increased the difficulty. Up the health and reducing the damage. The biggest challenge in thronebreaker eq was avoiding lag and not falling asleep doing the fights. Some original nodes would have been nice.
  • FrostGiantLordFrostGiantLord Member Posts: 2,097 ★★★★
    This months EQ wasn't worth it at all, rewards were the same, while the difficulty level was bumped up tremendously. I expected more from Kabam's decision making team
  • Markjv81Markjv81 Member Posts: 1,033 ★★★★
    Something more than just beefed up cav would have been nice.
  • Nameless_IWNameless_IW Member Posts: 1,069 ★★★★
    I found it extremely disappointing. Fight take forever and the rewards are not worth it.
  • benshbbenshb Member Posts: 837 ★★★★
    It's literally copy-paste of cav difficulty with 7* base heroes. No extra challenge whatsoever, just more boring and tedious fights. Idea:
    Drop half of the lanes, so it won't be as repetitive, maybe put in 1-2 more opponents per lane to compensate the lack of paths. Come up with new class-node combinations, maybe spice it up with book 2 'weapon nodes' as well. And bump up the rewards, because it will be outdated in 2 months (if not already).
  • messmess Member Posts: 38
    edited January 2023
    Fight takes forever and you still have limited choice of champs. Disgusting and another Brick to quit the game. Its just becoming too far away from toilet title and too much time consuming. First breaking incursion by making it so freaking long now this. Try to guess why BG do popular....
  • jaythekidjaythekid Member Posts: 53
    edited January 2023
    I have 100% it but I dont like it. Had to restart alot on 3.2
Sign In or Register to comment.