Do you want to Kabam launch BG Seprate Engery Slot

Herry435Herry435 Member Posts: 26 ★
edited February 2023 in Suggestions and Requests

Do you want to Kabam launch BG Seprate Engery Slot 90 votes

Battleground Energy
61% 55 votes
Quest Energy
38% 35 votes
Post edited by Kabam Porthos on

Comments

  • Herry435Herry435 Member Posts: 26 ★
    Elder Mark is different thing ...i said because of energy shortage during event Quest
  • Ngoalong711Ngoalong711 Member Posts: 330 ★★
    how can you call elder's mark an energy while it can't recharge
  • CoppinCoppin Member Posts: 2,601 ★★★★★
    Furrymoosen said:

    Herry435 said:

    Elder Mark is different thing ...i said because of energy shortage during event Quest

    So a separate energy option already exists in Elder’s Marks, but that doesn’t count to you, so you want a different separate energy option? I get that Elder’s Marks don’t recharge like energy, but if there’s already two energy use options then there is no need for a third.
    He wants a separate FREE energy option..
    Buy an energy refill once in a while ...
  • AMS94AMS94 Member Posts: 1,776 ★★★★★
    That'll just give us one more thing to chase
    Instead of having a seperate energy, what we need is increased availability of energy refills

    Elder Marks is already there as an energy source for BGs......another one wouldn't make sense from any perspective
  • TheBeast996TheBeast996 Member Posts: 15 ★
    Never use energy anyway since it giveaway less points. Elder Marks make everything way faster and I get more points.
  • AleorAleor Member Posts: 3,165 ★★★★★
    I want a normal matchmaking, energy is fine
  • UnknownUnknown
    This content has been removed.
  • benshbbenshb Member Posts: 929 ★★★★★
    Yeah, the only way BG would be REALLY competitive if it'd had its own energy, without the ability to refill. You can disagree with me, but now it's not really competitive. Just spam refills or elder mark's bought with units and eventually you will end up places.
  • CoppinCoppin Member Posts: 2,601 ★★★★★
    benshb said:

    Yeah, the only way BG would be REALLY competitive if it'd had its own energy, without the ability to refill. You can disagree with me, but now it's not really competitive. Just spam refills or elder mark's bought with units and eventually you will end up places.

    So the only way the game would be competitive too is if they limited the ammount of revives and items used.. like in war in AQ but also into story mode...
  • JinxesaxeJinxesaxe Member Posts: 451 ★★★
    While I think it would be nice, it would be harder to manage. I only use quest energy when I've completed all monthly content 100% and have grinded up to max resources in 3.2. Which is to say pretty rarely. It's hard to use quest energy when you've finished all the content, and if there was another type of energy, it would make it even harder.

    Jinx
  • MrSakuragiMrSakuragi Member Posts: 6,428 ★★★★★
    Demonzfyre said:

    Ngoalong711 said:

    how can you call elder's mark an energy while it can't recharge

    Well it technically does because you get a ton of it from rewards and moving up ranks.
    You get enough to do 2 matches every time you move up. That is… not a lot. 🤷‍♂️
  • benshbbenshb Member Posts: 929 ★★★★★
    Coppin said:

    benshb said:

    Yeah, the only way BG would be REALLY competitive if it'd had its own energy, without the ability to refill. You can disagree with me, but now it's not really competitive. Just spam refills or elder mark's bought with units and eventually you will end up places.

    So the only way the game would be competitive too is if they limited the ammount of revives and items used.. like in war in AQ but also into story mode...
    I don't remember story mode ever being part of the competitive aspect of the game. And yeah, as you can see.... AQ and AW potion and energy usage is limited too. The competitive part of the game
  • K00shMaanK00shMaan Member Posts: 1,289 ★★★★
    No need to have a new currency or energy type but maybe a calendar like they have when BGs first formally launched would be nice.
  • AdevatiAdevati Member Posts: 440 ★★★
    Let’s just focus on removing prestige based matchmaking and better mod detection.

    Energy/marks as entry fees are fine as is.
  • CoppinCoppin Member Posts: 2,601 ★★★★★
    benshb said:

    Coppin said:

    benshb said:

    Yeah, the only way BG would be REALLY competitive if it'd had its own energy, without the ability to refill. You can disagree with me, but now it's not really competitive. Just spam refills or elder mark's bought with units and eventually you will end up places.

    So the only way the game would be competitive too is if they limited the ammount of revives and items used.. like in war in AQ but also into story mode...
    I don't remember story mode ever being part of the competitive aspect of the game. And yeah, as you can see.... AQ and AW potion and energy usage is limited too. The competitive part of the game
    Lol story mode means progression, at this time full r4 mats... Its the most competitive...
  • Ironman3000Ironman3000 Member Posts: 2,019 ★★★★★
    If they could do it correctly, yes. Too much still to do with quest energy now.
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Member, Guardian Posts: 20,778 Guardian
    People asking for separate BG energy think that if they get a separate energy resource, they'll end up with *more* energy for BG. The exact opposite is true. If we had a separate energy resource for BG, it would be vastly more constrained than normal quest energy, and it would cost a lot more to refill. So no, I don't think that's a good idea.
  • Ironman3000Ironman3000 Member Posts: 2,019 ★★★★★
    DNA3000 said:

    People asking for separate BG energy think that if they get a separate energy resource, they'll end up with *more* energy for BG. The exact opposite is true. If we had a separate energy resource for BG, it would be vastly more constrained than normal quest energy, and it would cost a lot more to refill. So no, I don't think that's a good idea.

    You're probably right considering how they would implement it.
Sign In or Register to comment.