This month's side quest (June 2023) is just unbelievably not worth it.
Valroz
Member Posts: 218 ★★★
This month's side quest has been disappointing compared to previous ones in Marvel Contest of Champions. The rewards, especially the relic-focused ones, have been underwhelming. The grinding required has become more repetitive, lacking creativity and excitement. Even the 6-star awakening gem is probably the only one worth putting effort into -- when you look at what needs to be done to get it -- seems like not worth the effort to grind for it anymore.
It's important for us to address this issue, Kabam. We wonder what discussions have been taking place during your game planning sessions. It feels like someone may have overlooked certain aspects. This side quest doesn't meet the expectations of both new and seasoned players. In the previous month's side quest, players at the Uncollected and below levels could obtain over 8000 6-star shards if they performed well beating the Threat Levels way above their level. However, this month's rewards offer no more than 2500 shards. Additionally, players are required to engage in tedious duels or search for specific champions within story quests just to get started.
It's disheartening to express the level of frustration experienced when repeatedly defeating a particular Spider-Verse champion in order to acquire a mere 10,000 spider-bots, which can be traded for unappealing and underwhelming rewards. Offering only 1400 7-star shards is quite disappointing. If we were to grade each aspect of the side quest, it would fall short in every category.
Given the circumstances, it may be better to redirect our focus to the arena or the Battlegrounds, despite its known bugs. Alternatively, we can immerse ourselves in the story this month and explore 8.2.
We sincerely hope that this side quest marks the end of such disappointing experiences.
It's important for us to address this issue, Kabam. We wonder what discussions have been taking place during your game planning sessions. It feels like someone may have overlooked certain aspects. This side quest doesn't meet the expectations of both new and seasoned players. In the previous month's side quest, players at the Uncollected and below levels could obtain over 8000 6-star shards if they performed well beating the Threat Levels way above their level. However, this month's rewards offer no more than 2500 shards. Additionally, players are required to engage in tedious duels or search for specific champions within story quests just to get started.
It's disheartening to express the level of frustration experienced when repeatedly defeating a particular Spider-Verse champion in order to acquire a mere 10,000 spider-bots, which can be traded for unappealing and underwhelming rewards. Offering only 1400 7-star shards is quite disappointing. If we were to grade each aspect of the side quest, it would fall short in every category.
Given the circumstances, it may be better to redirect our focus to the arena or the Battlegrounds, despite its known bugs. Alternatively, we can immerse ourselves in the story this month and explore 8.2.
We sincerely hope that this side quest marks the end of such disappointing experiences.
27
Comments
If you're looking for instant paragon, you'll have to wait a month and save up those ducats...
Game developer needs to consider having start time rotated around the world so that some others can benefit a little.
Repent.
Good thing is I can happily take a break and invest that time to do something productive in real life 😁
Especially That node which made it mandatory to use a bleed DOT based attacker who can counter evade.
Since we have 7stars defenders that reduces reliablity of crit based attacker it prolongs the fight. And top it off with Doom boss on an unstoppable on knockdown node, really not fun without a proper counter .
All in all it is catered to paragons who are not restricted with the roster. And the SQ still fails to make any significant contribution to their rosters.
So Apart from instant access, SQ is a let down due to its restrictiveness.
Thanks to anyone who can confirm:)