**Mastery Loadouts**
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Due to issues related to the release of Mastery Loadouts, the "free swap" period will be extended.
The new end date will be May 1st.
Options
Matchmaking insanity
TriasEU
Posts: 110 ★
Dear Kabam,
A known problem for a while is the matchmaking system in battlegrounds and it still seems to be a problem. This problem is in this game-mode since the beginning. First it was sandbagging and now we just get deathmatches.
I will show you some accounts that you let me fight up against and tell me if its a fair match please.
P.S. Lets not even talk about the alliance bug that has been in the game for over 4years now.
Please do something about the matchmaking system to make it fair for all players and not only the people with big accounts.
A known problem for a while is the matchmaking system in battlegrounds and it still seems to be a problem. This problem is in this game-mode since the beginning. First it was sandbagging and now we just get deathmatches.
I will show you some accounts that you let me fight up against and tell me if its a fair match please.
P.S. Lets not even talk about the alliance bug that has been in the game for over 4years now.
Please do something about the matchmaking system to make it fair for all players and not only the people with big accounts.
2
Comments
If it's any consolation, I feel you. I'm stuck in D2. Just haven't had the string of luck yet. I'm TB.
Imo if you’re cav just get to p3-d1 whatever you like. And then work on story. Titles are what gets you better rewards. Bgs for now should be fun and a good source of rewards but not your focus.
If you look properly, I clearly stated that going up against paragons at my level is stupid and is completely unfair if I'm in bronze 3 and got a decent r3 roster why am I facing paragons with more than 3 r4's doesn't make any sense.
Replace Mutants with UCs.
In traditional playoff structure, the weakest team always plays the best team unless there's a bye. For example in a 8 team playoff, 8 plays 1. Those teams are competing for the same rewards like you are competing for the same rewards. If you're an 8, you aren't guaranteed or required to match another 8. You want to move up, you face harder opponents.
To this day, I can't understand why people still don't understand this.
VT is a competition ladder. To move up, you should be able to beat the players in your ladder rung. At the bottom, there's a whole mix of players, some with strong roster and some with weak roster. On average, you should be able to beat move of them than you would lose to, to prove you are better than the average player in that rung. When you move up, you should be able to beat the players in that rung, and so on.
Because each BG season resets everyone's VT ladder rung, initially the lower rungs are full of both strong and weak rosters. This means there's no way to face "the average player" in that rung, you just have to face a random match out of that rung. In the very lowest rungs, the game biases your matches towards players closer to your roster strength. But eventually, it requires you to face *all* the players in your ruing, because that's the fair thing to do. If some players only face so-called "equal" matches then they get to advance to higher rungs even though they aren't facing the actual strength of the players at that rung.
That would be like having an alliance of UC players getting to tier 1 in alliance war getting masters rewards because they only had to face other UC alliances, and did not have to face the actual strength of tier 3 alliances and then tier 2 alliances and then tier 1 alliances, and then just racked up 8x multiplier points without facing any of the top alliances at all, because it would be "unfair."