Question about relics

ManbatnManbatn Member Posts: 71 ★
in General Discussion
I could be wrong but I thought relics were supposed to be optional? There are more and more nodes coming out that you need to use them for. Side question why are they called relics and not just strikers?

Comments

  • winterthurwinterthur Member Posts: 8,071 ★★★★★
    There will be other forms of Relic. The current set is named Battlecasts.


  • ManbatnManbatn Member Posts: 71 ★
    winterthur said:

    There will be other forms of Relic. The current set is named Battlecasts.


    Ahh thank you! I’m excited to get some that aren’t strikers

  • Crimson8399Crimson8399 Member Posts: 762 ★★★
    Ugh, more collecting. Hopefully the next series of relics does something more useful than just stun.
  • Hort4Hort4 Member Posts: 507 ★★★
    Crimson8399 said:

    Ugh, more collecting. Hopefully the next series of relics does something more useful than just stun.

    Stun is great to get in additional 5 hit combo. Plus they do add additional features. Love Antman relic on both Cassie and Piggy.
  • iDestroyerZiDestroyerZ Member Posts: 729 ★★★★
    edited June 2023
    My main problem with these nodes rn is the fact that we don't have enough strikers, it's annoying that if you want to use that champion in that path, you need to go to relics, remove from some champion and equip on the champion that you want to use it just so you can some sort of power gain...seriously kabam this is just not fun '-' they need to release strikers more often if they continuing to force us to use them

    Another thing that doesn't help with getting more strikers is RNG...it's been quite a while that kabam released green goblin as a striker and to this point i don't have any rarity of him...neither black widow or valquiria, i continue to dup some other relics and not get a new one
Sign In or Register to comment.