**KNOWN AW ISSUE**
Please be aware, there is a known issue with Saga badging when observing the AW map.
The team have found the source of the issue and will be updating with our next build.
We apologize for the inconvenience.
**KNOWN BUG - SPRING OF SORROW ANNIHILUS**
Currently, Annihilus has their Signature ability erroneously set to 1 - it should be 0.

The team will be fixing this issue ASAP.

Thank you for your patience.
Options

Odds of pulling four of the same champ from fourteen featured crystals

Saw a recent video which asked this question, thought it would be worth going through the math because I suspect this lands into very unintuitive territory. Also, with the new featured crystal rolling over, I thought this might be topical.

Note: I'm not calling out anyone here, if anyone knows the video I'm referencing, this is strictly an exercise in probability I thought would be interesting. I don't actually believe the video author was making any accusations or anything, they were just saying something off the cuff.

How do you even calculate something like this? There is the direct way which is actually much more complicated than you might think, and then there's the cop out way using a computer. I'm going with the easy way. But first, for those reading this, wanna take a guess what the odds of pulling at least four of the same champ from a featured crystal with twenty four different random possibilities would be if you opened fourteen of them? My guess is the average guess would be one percent or lower. Having done a ton of these calculations, I know that's way too low.

You might think there's an easy closed form formula for this, but those formulas run into a problem: with fourteen pulls when you try counting what four of them do you end up miscounting what happens in the other ten in lots of very subtle ways. Fourteen pulls can lliterally pack three four of a kinds in there in theory. There are two ways to get around this: do an iterative calculation where you calculate the specific odds of exactly four of a kind, five of a kind, and so on, and sum, or do a inclusion/exclusion calculation that accounts for the set permutations directly. Both of these suck, so I'm instead going to just whip up a python script to do this Monte Carlo style.

Basically, we just want to roll 24 sided dice fourteen times, and determine which number came up the most often. We then record that, do that, say, a million times, and generate a frequency table: how often do we get four of a kind, five of a kind, and so on. We only care if the fourteen pulls generated *at least* one four of a kind or higher, so recording the highest frequency result is good enough. And we get:

[0, 8120, 595188, 345642, 46690, 4091, 254, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0]

So, out of a million tries, we get 8120 where the highest multiple was one, which is to say they were all different. That's 0.00812, or 0.812% or one in 123. Getting all different pulls is actually quite uncommon. The odds of four of a kind are 46690 out of a million or 4.7%. But that's exactly four in a row. The odds for four in a row or more are the sum of four in a row, five in a row, six in a row, and so on. Which for this estimate, is 46690 + 4091 + 254 + 15 = 51050.

So the odds of getting at least four of a kind in fourteen pulls is about 5%, or about one in twenty. This falls into the category of not common, but not exactly rare either.

I suspect most people would have guessed way lower than that. It *seems* like it should be much rarer. I do this a lot and my original guess was one in thirty which is still lower than the actual result.

Full disclosure: I did a back of envelope calculation for this first, got an answer I thought was sus, then did the monte carlo estimation script which showed I made an error in my first lazy calculation. Always be careful about statistics calculations: everyone makes mistakes with those.

Comments

  • Options
    BigBusterBigBuster Posts: 292 ★★★
    i had seen this and was thinking of doing it with PIE or a case by case approach but it seems like a pain. your method is much smarter
  • Options
    Graves_3Graves_3 Posts: 1,369 ★★★★★
    Thank you for using the term featured crystals rather than featureds which a lot of people use.
  • Options
    OpandemonioOpandemonio Posts: 1,288 ★★★★
    edited November 2023
    .
  • Options
    Dfour24Dfour24 Posts: 79
    I mean I pulled Electra 4xs today out of 17 pulls so that was just super...
  • Options
    GizGiz Posts: 146
    Dfour24 said:

    I mean I pulled Electra 4xs today out of 17 pulls so that was just super...

    I pulled her twice out of 8 lol
  • Options
    GladsGlads Posts: 408 ★★★
    @DNA3000 my first question is why use a Monte carlo simulation these aren't random events and certainly not Gaussian distributed. Of a generic 6 star crystal with let's say 300 champs, there is a probability of 0.3% (assuming the pool is evenly weighted) to land Groot. As it is statistically based the change of landing Groot again on the 2nd, 3rd and 4th time decreases. Which would take that chance 0.008 chances in 100 to have 4 successive hots of Groot.
    This in improbable so why does it happen and I am being bold by saying relatively frequently. How does this happen the RNG might be set to 0.3% pay out but again assuming there is only 1 crystal RNG in mcoc with let's say 100k of players if a group of these are opening crystals at the same time these rates are artificial inflated as there are only 300 champs.
    If you place this in context with powerball (lotto) where there is 1 chance in 134 million to win given 134 million combinations with sequence and number probability wins aren't normally distributed thus questioning your Monte Carlo simulation. Meaning sometimes no one wins for weeks other times 2 or 3 people win.
    What's the solution,
    Kabam could (if not done already) people in groups of x to ensure there median monthly crystal opening is similar, which would standardise the even weighting of pulling unique and multiple champs
    " on the back of an envelope"
  • Options
    KyrinMcHKyrinMcH Posts: 42
    this all brings me back to my first 6 5* class based awakening gem crystals in which i got 1 cosmic and 5 skill gems (1 for blade, 1 for gwenpool, 1 for aegon and 2 im pretty sure i still have). i did worked out the probability for that then and by hell statistic calculations are a demonic thing. over the course of my CS degree i had to do a few and tried to do them on paper and just gave up each time it was always simpler to write a script to do them for me.
  • Options
    Vegeta9001Vegeta9001 Posts: 1,494 ★★★★
    I only opened two so far, both were apocalypse
  • Options
    ReignkingTWReignkingTW Posts: 2,651 ★★★★★
    What a strange ratio...9 insightful 6 disagree...
  • Options
    AverageDesiAverageDesi Posts: 5,260 ★★★★★
    Does the youtuber's name rhyme with "10k units for Abyss "?
Sign In or Register to comment.