Will you be playing AQ, AW, Raids when radiance is added to rewards?

JESUSCHRISTJESUSCHRIST Member Posts: 1,916 ★★★★
edited May 28 in General Discussion
Kabam has said when radiance is introduced that it will be added to other modes like AQ, AW, Raids, we have seen radiance added to battlegrounds first and participation has increased, more players have reached GC

Will you be playing all the modes where there is radiance? Or some of them?

Will you be playing AQ, AW, Raids when radiance is added to rewards? 100 votes

I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
69%
GamerHeinz11JerryJiverUltimate_RDJJohnnooooooCondemnedToeyossShaggyMLord_Apex666BayouemGarloDoomanPsgamer497LPtheArtist_666Grootman1294Anshuman_09Justcause102ArnavC19h28o2Ayden_noah1 69 votes
I will play 3 out of the 4 modes with radiance involved
20%
MasterSmokeLuciusVorenusNabbydianSakkbanAndyBaron7Cat_MurdockBeeweeCheeseHead4EVERRenaxqqAzenstarCap_MuricaArges54DeadTedpoolManbatnKLZSuper_Cretu90johnfrederic1HibblyJogiDassummerdeer 20 votes
I will play 2 out of the 4 modes with radiance involved
6%
JackTheSnackBassanoClappertufo24Duffman98BadahVelos 6 votes
I will play 1 out of the 4 modes with radiance involved
2%
AleorHiddenfuture69 2 votes
I will not play any of the 4 modes with radiance involved
3%
RevHeresyHainam219Shenk 3 votes

Comments

  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,496 ★★★★★
    Will do all but ngl , The fomo will be strong given how drastically the radiance scales downward. If you're not in plat 1/masters or top aq alliance you dont really get that many
  • JESUSCHRISTJESUSCHRIST Member Posts: 1,916 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again
  • FurrymoosenFurrymoosen Member Posts: 6,431 ★★★★★

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    So they don't play AQ and AW because they don't think it's worth it, but they do play BGs. But they play BGs because it's mandatory. I wonder if you'd have an alliance of people that play AQ and AW if that was mandatory too...
  • JESUSCHRISTJESUSCHRIST Member Posts: 1,916 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    So they don't play AQ and AW because they don't think it's worth it, but they do play BGs. But they play BGs because it's mandatory. I wonder if you'd have an alliance of people that play AQ and AW if that was mandatory too...
    Battlegrounds is different bcos there is 28 days for players to contribute points according to their schedule, there is no excuse not to play over 28 days

    Players have their own life, work, family etc

    AQ is 24 hours, AW is 48 hours so it's harder for adults to join in sometimes bcos of work etc
  • JESUSCHRISTJESUSCHRIST Member Posts: 1,916 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    Players will play at the beginning and then calculate if the radiance rewards are worth the time and effort for each mode
  • Abspain101Abspain101 Member Posts: 842 ★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    So they don't play AQ and AW because they don't think it's worth it, but they do play BGs. But they play BGs because it's mandatory. I wonder if you'd have an alliance of people that play AQ and AW if that was mandatory too...
    Battlegrounds is different bcos there is 28 days for players to contribute points according to their schedule, there is no excuse not to play over 28 days

    Players have their own life, work, family etc

    AQ is 24 hours, AW is 48 hours so it's harder for adults to join in sometimes bcos of work etc
    Technically aw is 28 days as well you dont get the radiance until the season is over aq is a weekly thing raids 1 week every 4 weeks everything adds up in the end
  • JESUSCHRISTJESUSCHRIST Member Posts: 1,916 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    So they don't play AQ and AW because they don't think it's worth it, but they do play BGs. But they play BGs because it's mandatory. I wonder if you'd have an alliance of people that play AQ and AW if that was mandatory too...
    Battlegrounds is different bcos there is 28 days for players to contribute points according to their schedule, there is no excuse not to play over 28 days

    Players have their own life, work, family etc

    AQ is 24 hours, AW is 48 hours so it's harder for adults to join in sometimes bcos of work etc
    Technically aw is 28 days as well you dont get the radiance until the season is over aq is a weekly thing raids 1 week every 4 weeks everything adds up in the end
    AW is over a 48 hours window, sometimes ppl go on holidays, exams, busy with work etc

    In the new war, if you don't play within that 48 hours window, 1 path is not taken, you can't go back to that war even though the AW season is 28 days or whatever, that AW is over after 48 hours

    So AQ is within 24 hours, you don't play, it's over after 24 hours, you can't go back to that map

    Raids is over 7 days
  • TheUglyone123TheUglyone123 Member Posts: 661 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    I want to always be climbing and striving for the pinnacle rewards, so yes, always the mode with the best rewards
  • JESUSCHRISTJESUSCHRIST Member Posts: 1,916 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    Is the amount of radiance in AW rewards worth the effort?
  • TheUglyone123TheUglyone123 Member Posts: 661 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    I’ll be getting 75,000 at the end, so yes, it is
  • Ayden_noah1Ayden_noah1 Member Posts: 2,361 ★★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    I already play all 4 so that's adding radiance is just the cherry on top.
  • TheTrueBeast10TheTrueBeast10 Member Posts: 134 ★★★

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    You sound like a fun leader
  • FurrymoosenFurrymoosen Member Posts: 6,431 ★★★★★

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    So they don't play AQ and AW because they don't think it's worth it, but they do play BGs. But they play BGs because it's mandatory. I wonder if you'd have an alliance of people that play AQ and AW if that was mandatory too...
    Battlegrounds is different bcos there is 28 days for players to contribute points according to their schedule, there is no excuse not to play over 28 days

    Players have their own life, work, family etc

    AQ is 24 hours, AW is 48 hours so it's harder for adults to join in sometimes bcos of work etc
    Yes, BGs is far more flexible than alliance content. There is no denying that. But you said yourself that it seems players do it because it's mandatory. My point is, you'd probably have players that did all three of all three were mandatory. Your experience in players not doing AQ and AW isn't indicative of whether or not they want to play because you've filled your alliance with players that don't want to play it. They're lazy because you've created a lazy environment, which is fine because every once in awhile players need it, but that doesn't mean they're capable of not being lazy if more is required of them to be in the alliance.
  • ItsClobberinTimeItsClobberinTime Member Posts: 6,381 ★★★★★
    edited May 29
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    Polygon said:

    Will do all but ngl , The fomo will be strong given how drastically the radiance scales downward. If you're not in plat 1/masters or top aq alliance you dont really get that many

    That's not 100% true Plat 2-4 still gives you enough for a couple r3s.
  • RevHeresyRevHeresy Member Posts: 211
    I will not play any of the 4 modes with radiance involved
    I don’t have enough time for Alliance play, sadly.
  • PolygonPolygon Member Posts: 5,496 ★★★★★

    Polygon said:

    Will do all but ngl , The fomo will be strong given how drastically the radiance scales downward. If you're not in plat 1/masters or top aq alliance you dont really get that many

    That's not 100% true Plat 2-4 still gives you enough for a couple r3s.
    @ItsClobberinTime not too worried about t3s tbh, its the t7b im looking at and facepalming as its going to create a massive divide in roster *for even the players that are not big spenders* in Battlegrounds, making each season even more difficult to reach m3 in (they did a terrible job scaling the rewards so quantum and arcane give 60% (or even more) less radiance
  • JESUSCHRISTJESUSCHRIST Member Posts: 1,916 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    So they don't play AQ and AW because they don't think it's worth it, but they do play BGs. But they play BGs because it's mandatory. I wonder if you'd have an alliance of people that play AQ and AW if that was mandatory too...
    Battlegrounds is different bcos there is 28 days for players to contribute points according to their schedule, there is no excuse not to play over 28 days

    Players have their own life, work, family etc

    AQ is 24 hours, AW is 48 hours so it's harder for adults to join in sometimes bcos of work etc
    Yes, BGs is far more flexible than alliance content. There is no denying that. But you said yourself that it seems players do it because it's mandatory. My point is, you'd probably have players that did all three of all three were mandatory. Your experience in players not doing AQ and AW isn't indicative of whether or not they want to play because you've filled your alliance with players that don't want to play it. They're lazy because you've created a lazy environment, which is fine because every once in awhile players need it, but that doesn't mean they're capable of not being lazy if more is required of them to be in the alliance.
    I'm not sure if you are an alliance leader or officer

    As they say, talking is easier than getting things done, it's easy to say that players will behave in a certain way if you made it mandatory

    The thing is I spoken to every valiant in my alliance and every single one of them said the rewards aren't worth it and they refuse to play, making it mandatory doesn't change anything, kicking players out of your alliance doesn't change anything, they just move to a chill alliance

    Even making battlegrounds mandatory did not yield good results, the alliance failed to score 9 million points until radiance was added to the rewards

    It's the rewards that motivate players to play, not whether the alliance leader said it is mandatory or not

    You can't force someone to play just bcos you are a leader, they won't play if the reward ain't good and it's either you kick them out or you accept the fact that they aren't going to play
  • Lord_Apex666Lord_Apex666 Member Posts: 87
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    We do AQ, AW, BG and will soon see what the next piece of content is revealed that will include Radiance and go for. Radiance being the biggest currency there should be no reason players should not push to get as much of it as possible
  • SirGamesBondSirGamesBond Member Posts: 7,570 ★★★★★

    For far too long many players don't play AQ and AW bcos they feel the rewards are worth it

    Now players have no excuse not to play

    I have a bunch of lazy valiants in my alliance that doesn't play anything except battlegrounds bcos I made it mandatory

    Every amount of radiance counts in the beginning until it becomes outdated again

    So they don't play AQ and AW because they don't think it's worth it, but they do play BGs. But they play BGs because it's mandatory. I wonder if you'd have an alliance of people that play AQ and AW if that was mandatory too...
    Battlegrounds is different bcos there is 28 days for players to contribute points according to their schedule, there is no excuse not to play over 28 days

    Players have their own life, work, family etc

    AQ is 24 hours, AW is 48 hours so it's harder for adults to join in sometimes bcos of work etc
    Yes, BGs is far more flexible than alliance content. There is no denying that. But you said yourself that it seems players do it because it's mandatory. My point is, you'd probably have players that did all three of all three were mandatory. Your experience in players not doing AQ and AW isn't indicative of whether or not they want to play because you've filled your alliance with players that don't want to play it. They're lazy because you've created a lazy environment, which is fine because every once in awhile players need it, but that doesn't mean they're capable of not being lazy if more is required of them to be in the alliance.
    Even making battlegrounds mandatory did not yield good results, the alliance failed to score 9 million points until radiance was added to the rewards
    Its not because of radiance. Its becase everyone started in gc and got double points due to new point structure.
  • ArmageddønArmageddøn Member Posts: 1,051 ★★★★
    I will play all 4 modes with radiance involved
    Do we know the timeline for radiance to be added in Raids? I know it’s being added in AQ starting 16 june but what about raids? Are we getting radiance in next raid cycle?
Sign In or Register to comment.