Options
What are your thoughts? Even legacy made a video


Quest 1 should have not been gaited at all. Also the rewards for quest 1 is literally like Nothing For the effort and fight. I think Kabam needs to buff rewards if they are going to let the difficult and gates same or remove gates.
19
Comments
The Contest, for better or worse, runs on FOMO, and removing some of that leads to less participation, a declining player base, and less profits for Netmarble. Even though we'd all enjoy a buff to WoF's rewards, Kabam has almost no reason to do so.
If they change wheel of Fate rewards, I imagine a fair portion of the community will just expect that they can complain about content to try and get the rewards buffed because that happened once so they will try to make it happen again.
No they did @Pikolu
Just still upset about it.
Move on, OP, there is no use complaining about it anymore.
Kabam isn't going to change it.
This content cost less revives and items than necro/epoch exploration costed at the time of their release. Maybe that's why we have less rewards.
I'd agree with the guys who have done it.(ignoring anyone who hasn't). They missed 3 importat Rewards. Refind xp, sigs and low tier Cats/gems.
...
Since we're talking about Lag's video, I'll copy and paste the comment I made under it.
If they really paused and considered the hype messaging… and HT being in there… that woulda made a big difference.
Ultimately it’s content that can be done at the cost of potions, which really aren’t used much these days, and you get an R4… it’s perfectly mid and will be skippable for its target audience in about 5 days
Complaints:
-After completing this my only thoughts were that the rewards did not feel like I had completed an Aspirational Everest piece of content. Guess how many rank ups I was able to afford after? 0. You'd think after completing something as difficult as WOF you could take one or two champs up in rank but no, you get most of the materials for a 3-4, but not all.
-I work in a job with quite a bit of customer service, so when I saw the selector fiasco after listening to the livestream it put a horrible taste in my mouth, then for Kabam to not rectify the situation made me feel worthless as a customer. In fact if I didn't have an overflowing amount of revives, I wouldn't have done this content simply because the selector felt like a slap in the face. Either put the two champs missing into the selector, or remove those two defenders.
-This is both a complaint and a critique; I didn't really care for the selection of attackers we were forced to choose from in the sense that tags were maybe a poor route to go. Why? Because out of a selection of maybe 10-15 attackers, only tops 4 were viable/usable... in some cases 1. A much more fun idea (I think) would have been a selection of maybe 5-7 attackers that the developers chose. The one rule I'd give them for choosing said attackers is, "each attacker in that selection must be capable of soloing the defender" (no Adam Warlock for Gorr or Symbiote Supreme for Leader). Why go this route instead of tags? Tags usually make it where only 1-3 are viable attackers so everyone uses those same attackers on any given fight (unless you don't have them, then I guess you don't get to play with the kool kids). I'd like to take someone unique, like for LDS I used IMIW. It feels nice to pull out a champ from the bench that usually you go "why does this champ exist" only to use them in a niche fight and say WOW that champ was amazing! Tags usually rip away that opportunity so you use Juggs for the 14th time that day to solo Gorr. Maybe a bad idea but I'm spitballin here, I'm sure it could be fleshed out more. Plus, now you only need ONE of those viable champs instead of a very specific champ.
What I'd Change:
-You already heard my selected attackers vs tags rant so good idea or bad idea I won't bore you anymore with that.
-Rewards, I'd do something about that selector, goodness gracious.
Quest 1: Change 7* shards to 15,000. Change Titan shards to 20,000 and give a generic 1-2 gem. You just completed a difficult quest but have 2 more to go! Pull those champs you need in the second quest and at least get them to rank 2!
Quest 2: Add a 2-3 class gem. Not much to say since rewards felt alright but didn't have any catalysts/ gems to take up a champ for the 3rd quest.
Quest 3: Do I need to talk about the selector again? Add a Nexus Titan, I shouldn't have to choose between that and the crappy selector. I didn't really care for the fact that I basically got the same rewards as quest 2 and still couldn't rank up anyone.
COMPLETION: Cool profile pic. But with the rewards that were given... that's it?
I know it's a lot but it just felt like this content had SO much potential and instead fell flat on release. I definitely think if rewards were revised it would change everyone's opinion.
But going forward, if Kabam releases another piece of content like this please learn from these mistakes.