Wow man it definitely is the AI art and not the fact that the whole post is literally AI. The emojis, the em dashes, the breaks. Literally everything about this post is AI.
If 90% of the post is AI and you don't see an issue with that, you can definitely see past the ai art.
I'm going to be honest man, I didn't even read it because of the AI art at the bottom. But that makes it even worse. I absolutely despise OP dumping his AI slop here or anywhere else.
You are right I am not gonna lie.. most of it is from the help of ai some are edited.
Use your creativity and create something new. AI is like a recycler completely void of all thought and hardwork. If we wanted to hear ideas from AI, we wouldn't need you to be the middle man.
AI is better in creating this kind of stuff than us. Just needs some proof reading.
It's also terrible for the environment
Ok well that argument is only half true. It depends on for what kind of stuff you create using AI.
A simple google search definitely has more impact if you use AI tools. Image generation, the energy consumption is almost identical, because a similar image could take a hour or more to generate so you end up consuming more electricity. For video generation, Ai models are usually more sustainable than real ones especially if you use camera and need to travel to certain places to shoot them.
Also ai is quite sustainable if corporate that use AI models are not greedy. The two things it mainly need - electricity and water.
Good thing is, Ai models can use seawater for cooling purposes, just these corporates don't do it cuz establishment cost is high. Similarity electricity is also clean and renewable if not for the politics and greed.
I believe Ai is supposed to do the lazy less interesting work like copying Excel sheets and writing yap academic papers (not the actual ones with content, but the useless ones these schools and colleges give, which teach nothing and nobody reads).. They should not take part in creative stuff like editing and art.
Wow man it definitely is the AI art and not the fact that the whole post is literally AI. The emojis, the em dashes, the breaks. Literally everything about this post is AI.
If 90% of the post is AI and you don't see an issue with that, you can definitely see past the ai art.
I'm going to be honest man, I didn't even read it because of the AI art at the bottom. But that makes it even worse. I absolutely despise OP dumping his AI slop here or anywhere else.
You are right I am not gonna lie.. most of it is from the help of ai some are edited.
Use your creativity and create something new. AI is like a recycler completely void of all thought and hardwork. If we wanted to hear ideas from AI, we wouldn't need you to be the middle man.
AI is better in creating this kind of stuff than us. Just needs some proof reading.
It's also terrible for the environment
Ok well that argument is only half true. It depends on for what kind of stuff you create using AI.
A simple google search definitely has more impact if you use AI tools. Image generation, the energy consumption is almost identical, because a similar image could take a hour or more to generate so you end up consuming more electricity. For video generation, Ai models are usually more sustainable than real ones especially if you use camera and need to travel to certain places to shoot them.
Also ai is quite sustainable if corporate that use AI models are not greedy. The two things it mainly need - electricity and water.
Good thing is, Ai models can use seawater for cooling purposes, just these corporates don't do it cuz establishment cost is high. Similarity electricity is also clean and renewable if not for the politics and greed.
I believe Ai is supposed to do the lazy less interesting work like copying Excel sheets and writing yap academic papers (not the actual ones with content, but the useless ones these schools and colleges give, which teach nothing and nobody reads).. They should not take part in creative stuff like editing and art.
Ai centres as they currently exist and are predominantly used are bad for the environment, and this is from someone that actively defends specific uses of ai within art
Comments
A simple google search definitely has more impact if you use AI tools. Image generation, the energy consumption is almost identical, because a similar image could take a hour or more to generate so you end up consuming more electricity. For video generation, Ai models are usually more sustainable than real ones especially if you use camera and need to travel to certain places to shoot them.
Also ai is quite sustainable if corporate that use AI models are not greedy. The two things it mainly need - electricity and water.
Good thing is, Ai models can use seawater for cooling purposes, just these corporates don't do it cuz establishment cost is high. Similarity electricity is also clean and renewable if not for the politics and greed.
I believe Ai is supposed to do the lazy less interesting work like copying Excel sheets and writing yap academic papers (not the actual ones with content, but the useless ones these schools and colleges give, which teach nothing and nobody reads).. They should not take part in creative stuff like editing and art.