**WINTER OF WOE - BONUS OBJECTIVE POINT**
As previously announced, the team will be distributing an additional point toward milestones to anyone who completed the Absorbing Man fight in the first step of the Winter of Woe.
This point will be distributed at a later time as it requires the team to pull and analyze data.
The timeline has not been set, but work has started.
There is currently an issue where some Alliances are are unable to find a match in Alliance Wars, or are receiving Byes without getting the benefits of the Win. We will be adjusting the Season Points of the Alliances that are affected within the coming weeks, and will be working to compensate them for their missed Per War rewards as well.

Additionally, we are working to address an issue where new Members of an Alliance are unable to place Defenders for the next War after joining. We are working to address this, but it will require a future update.

as a player i should be entitled to a rank down at will.

KALIZOKALIZO Posts: 484 ★★
with the game constantly changing, the player base is only allowed to get these "rank downs" only when kabam sees fit or when the community is :angry:
with time, ive come to the conclusion that i dont need certain champs for x y z reason.
i should be entitled to rank down that champ "at will" or at the cost ox x amount of gold or built a soft stop before using the rank down.
why i say i should be entitled to a rank down?
the effort that it took me to gain all resources should be enough for me to rank down a champ.
thank you.

Comments

  • DaleManguDaleMangu Posts: 48
    On a side note, from what i heard, there is another quest to farm revives in :)
  • BitterSteelBitterSteel Posts: 9,254 ★★★★★
    Once you put those resources into a champion they are gone. If you can get them back at will then I would literally only ever rank up maybe 17 champions. 3 for AQ, 8 for Aw, 5 for questing and one for fun. Ridiculous idea, takes all of the spirit of the game away. Why do AQ when you can just get those resources back by ranking someone down?
  • RaganatorRaganator Posts: 2,498 ★★★★★
    At least you used the right word there..."entitled".
  • JayBird_IsTheWordJayBird_IsTheWord Posts: 159 ★★
    @Kabam Miike you know....if they put rank down in as a cash offer deal, they can make some serious cash...just saying...it's just business!
  • RaganatorRaganator Posts: 2,498 ★★★★★
    Just imagine how rare they would make rank up materials would be if this were implemented. Progression would be even more frustrating.
  • DaleManguDaleMangu Posts: 48
    Im not talking about the one that has been fixed :)
  • DNA3000DNA3000 Posts: 18,552 Guardian
    @Kabam Miike you know....if they put rank down in as a cash offer deal, they can make some serious cash...just saying...it's just business!

    If they sold admin rights to the game servers, I'm sure they could make even more cash. For a very short period of time.

    Selling RDTs might seem to be a money maker, but that's only in the immediate short term. In the longer term, it basically undermines the value of rank up resources, which no one would need more than a small finite supply of, because they could keep recycling them for the cost of an RDT, which almost certainly cannot be priced the effective value of all the time and money spent to earn the resources being recycled.
  • SnizzbarSnizzbar Posts: 2,142 ★★★★★
    edited May 2018
    One 5* R3 to R2 and one 4* R5 to R4 rank down ticket every six months should be plenty. There have been a couple of times when I've made a 50/50 call and ranked up and the very next pull I've got someone I would have rather ranked.
Sign In or Register to comment.